· Public charity
The National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment Inc
The national center for the improvement of educational assessment, inc.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2024.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 7 grants below total $45,000 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $55,568 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $10,568 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k6 grants · $30k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $15k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| NCME | $15,000 |
| COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF STRAFFORD COUNTY | $5,000 |
| CHILDREN'S MUSEUM | $5,000 |
| UNH FOUNDATION | $5,000 |
| END 68 HOURS OF HUNGER | $5,000 |
| SOUTHEAST LAND TRUST OF NEW HAMPSHIRE | $5,000 |
| SEACOAST EDUCATIONAL ENDOWMENT | $5,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–24, $32k) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
13 repeat relationships — 7 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- E6END 68 HOURS OF HUNGER8× · 2017–2025 · $32k · revenue +111%
- CACOMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF STRAFFORD COUNTY5× · 2020–2025 · $32k · revenue +35%
- CMCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF NEW HAMPSHIRE6× · 2017–2025 · $24k · revenue +59%
Funded once
- SLSoutheast Land Trust of New Hampshiregraduatedone grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +37%
- UTUNH TECHNICAL CAMPone grant, 2017 · $9k
- UOUNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATIONgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue +58%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
New hampshire fiscal policy institute promotes opportunity and economic well-being for all new hampshire residents by producing and disseminating independent research and analysis to inform public policy.
New hampshire women's foundation invests in opportunity and equality for women and girls in new hampshire through research, advocacy, education and grant making.
See schedule othe mission of new england college of optometry is to change the way people see the world.we do so by:- integrating innovative education with early and diverse clinical experiences to prepare today's optometrists for…
Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.
To build a movement of people and organizations in New Hampshire to protect democracy and voting rights.
The organization's mission is to conserve and promote new england's native plants to ensure healthy, biologically diverse landscapes.
To improve the visual health of populations through excellence in collaborative and community-oriented patient care, education and research.
Natural History Institute is organized to provide leadership and resources for a revitalized practice of natural history that integrates art, science, and humanities to promote the health and well-being of humans and the rest of the…
New england law/boston dedicates itself to preparing students to be successful lawyers and leaders in the public and private sectors through integrated practical, theoretical and ethical education of the highest caliber and to contributing…
The mission of entrepreneur fund is to advance community economic development in rural and underserved communities. we work to achieve this by actively partnering with entrepreneurs to stimulate the growth of successful businesses. our…
Wentworth institute of technology is a nationally recognized private coeducational and residential university of higher education with a mission to empower, inspire and innovate through experiential learning with a core purpose of career…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Children's Museum of New Hampshire and the most unlike its peers is Annie E Woodman Institute. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 26 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds SEACOAST EDUCATIONAL ENDOWMENT FOR DOVER ↗
- Who funds END 68 HOURS OF HUNGER ↗
- Who funds COMMUNITY ACTION PARTNERSHIP OF STRAFFORD COUNTY ↗
- Who funds Southeast Land Trust of New Hampshire ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF NEW HAMPSHIRE ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL COUNCIL ON MEASUREMENT IN EDUCATION INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEW HAMPSHIRE FOUNDATION INCORPORATED ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF COLORADO FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PUBLIC SCHOOLS OF HAWAII FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds ARTS IN REACH - ENCOURAGING GROWTH THROUGH THE ARTS ↗
- Who funds LITTLE HARBOUR CHARITABLE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds MOTHERHOOD BEYOND BARS INC ↗
- Who funds DANA-FARBER INC ↗
- Who funds ANNIE E WOODMAN INSTITUTE ↗
- Who funds NEW HAMPSHIRE CONGRESS PARENTS AND TEACHERS - D/B/A DOVER MIDDLE SCHOOL PTA ↗
- Who funds ANNIE E WOODMAN INSTITUTE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Federal Savings Bank Charitable Foundation Inc · Lincoln Financial Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The National Center for the Improvement of Educational Assessment Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.