Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Nathan & Lena Seiler Family Fdn

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$180k
Granted FY2024still arriving
34
Grants FY2024still arriving
11
States reached
$45k
Largest
01What it funds
0181% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2024.

Religion$445kYouth Development$125kCivil Rights$98kInternational$69kPublic Safety & Disaster$56kPhilanthropy$51kArts & Culture$46kFood & Nutrition$43kOther$0
02FY2024 · 34 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k30 grants · $98k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $83k
$4,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CONGREGATION LAASOK V'LAASOK$44,500
YESHIVA INSTITUTE DIVREI SHMUEL$18,000
TAMPA TORAH CENTER$10,000
FOOD FOR FREE COMMITTEE$10,000
CHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGE FOUNDATION$9,000
THE RED ROVER RELIEF$7,500
THE PETER WESTBROOK FOUNDATION$7,500
MISHMERES HASHALOM$6,800
THE CENTER FOR INQUIRY$6,000
YAFFED$6,000
CENTER FOR DISASTER PHILATHROPY$5,000
ALIGHT$5,000
TEXAS TORAH CENTER$5,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MOSDOS MONTREAL$5,000
THE BRATTLE FILM FOUNDATION$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–19, $15k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $15k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
MN
IL
WI
MI
NY
MA
NV
OH
NJ
CA
MO
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.2M · 40 repeat orgs$149k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +38% since the first grant, against +14% for those funded once.

40 repeat relationships: 22 still active in FY2024, 18 since wound down; 12 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

40
24

Total granted

$1.2M
$111k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+14%

Still filing today

35%
25%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 79% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
ReligionEducationInternationalArts & CulturePhilanthropyCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PW
    PETER WESTBROOK FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2019–2024 · $100k · revenue +43%
  • CC
    CHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGE FOUNDATION
    6× · 2018–2024 · $53k · revenue +13%
  • AC
    American Commitee for Ahavas Torah Inc
    3× · 2018–2020 · $48k · revenue +45%

Funded once

  • BF
    BOOKS FOR AFRICA INC
    one grant, 2019 · $20k · revenue -27%
  • TI
    THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $15k · revenue +35%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2018 · $12k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—
2
American Friends of Torah and Tefilah Ramat Eshkol Inc

To promote and support jewish religious charitable and educational activities in israel & usa.

Religion
3
Bais Medrash Mayan Hatorah

To provide religious education and services to our students in the tradition of the orthodox jewish faith

—
4
American Friends of Rabbinical College Netiv Hadaat Inc

To support, benefit, and assist yeshivat netiv hadaat- jerusalem

Education
5
Jewish Educational Media

Preserve and curate educational and historical video, audio and photography, sharing these archival treasures through educational programming. our most prominent subject is the rebbe, rabbi menachem m. schneerson, of righteous memory

Religion
6
Partners in Torah

Offering jewish adults a personal connection to judaism,fostering a sense of belonging to the greater jewishcommunity, and building bridges between jews of allbackgrounds. to date, over 74,000 men and women from 39countries have been…

Religion
7
American Friends of Oseh Chayil

To further jewish education in israel

Religion
8
Yeshiva Bais Mordechai of Teaneck

To provide religious Jewish education.

Education
9
Jewish Voice Ministries Intl

To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…

—
10
American Friends of Menuchas Asher Csenger Inc

To promote, benefit, and support jewish educational activities in israel

Religion
11
Zohar Hatorah Inc

Religious School

Religion
12
Yeshiva Derech Torah of Monsey Inc

To provide children with an outstanding Jewish and Secular education.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Vocational Service Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Innocence Project Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 76 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
14/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $109,100 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPETER WESTBROOK FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · OtherPETER WESTBROOK FOUNDATION INCCONGREGATION LAASOK VLAASOK INC: $63,500 · OtherCONGREGATION LAASOK VLAASOK INCIndividual grant recipient: $59,700 · OtherIndividual grant recipientYESHIVA INSTITUTE DIVREI SHMUEL INC: $57,000 · OtherYESHIVA INSTITUTE DIVREI SHMUEL INCLAHAV: $51,300 · OtherTHE RED ROVER RELIEF: $51,083 · Other+56 more: $486,850 · Other+56 moreCENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS: $95,000 · Civil RightsMISHMERES HASHOLOM INC: $33,900 · InternationalBOOKS FOR AFRICA INC: $20,000 · InternationalALIGHT: $14,875 · InternationalCHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $52,620 · ReligionFREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 · ReligionAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MOSDOS MONTREAL INC: $5,000 · Religion+2 more: $2,000 · ReligionAmerican Commitee for Ahavas Torah Inc: $47,650 · PhilanthropyBRATTLE FILM FOUNDATION INC: $26,500 · Arts & CultureCENTER FOR INQUIRY INC: $19,500 · Arts & CultureFOOD FOR FREE COMMITTEE INC: $42,500 · Food & Nutrition
Other$978,533Civil Rights$95,000International$68,775Religion$65,620Philanthropy$47,650Arts & Culture$46,000Food & Nutrition$42,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPETER WESTBROOK FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 5y, 16% of budgetCENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS: $95,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $52,620 over 6y, 0.5% of budgetAmerican Commitee for Ahavas Torah Inc: $47,650 over 3y, 3.1% of budgetFOOD FOR FREE COMMITTEE INC: $42,500 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMISHMERES HASHOLOM INC: $33,900 over 5y, 9.7% of budgetJEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICE INC: $30,084 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBRATTLE FILM FOUNDATION INC: $26,500 over 6y, 1.0% of budgetMORE THAN WORDS INC: $25,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetYAFFED INC: $23,000 over 5y, 1.1% of budgetBOOKS FOR AFRICA INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCENTER FOR INQUIRY INC: $19,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetTHE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC: $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetALIGHT: $14,875 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMISSOURI TORAH INSTITUTE: $8,360 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetFREEDOM FROM RELIGION FOUNDATION INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MOSDOS MONTREAL INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetCOOPERATIVE DEVELOPMENT INSTITUTE INC: $4,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLAKEWOOD CHEDER SCHOOL INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN HUMANIST ASSOCIATION: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHeritage House Inc: $1,800 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetJEWISH EDUCATION CENTER OF SOUTH FLORIDA: $1,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetKEREN OR INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PETER WESTBROOK FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR CONSTITUTIONAL RIGHTS ↗
  • Who funds CHOFETZ CHAIM HERITAGE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American Commitee for Ahavas Torah Inc ↗
  • Who funds FOOD FOR FREE COMMITTEE INC ↗
  • Who funds MISHMERES HASHOLOM INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH VOCATIONAL SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds BRATTLE FILM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds MORE THAN WORDS INC ↗
  • Who funds YAFFED INC ↗
  • Who funds BOOKS FOR AFRICA INC ↗
  • Who funds CENTER FOR INQUIRY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE INNOCENCE PROJECT INC ↗
  • Who funds ALIGHT ↗
  • Who funds MISSOURI TORAH INSTITUTE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY16.7× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Jack Adjmi Family Foundation Inc · The Ojc Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Shell USA Company Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Nathan & Lena Seiler Family Fdn funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Nathan & Lena Seiler Family Fdn. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 24%
  • Cooperative Development Institute Inc: 58% of income from government
  • Jewish Vocational Service Inc: 39% of income from government
  • More Than Words Inc: 24% of income from government
  • Food for Free Committee Inc: 3% of income from government
  • Brattle Film Foundation Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
2get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
1rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Nathan & Lena Seiler Family Fdn?

Find your warmest path to The Nathan & Lena Seiler Family Fdn through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 76 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Nathan & Lena Seiler Family Fdn’s filings →

More from the funding graph