Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Nancy H and William J Gordon Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$61k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Religion$71kEducation$51kRecreation & Sports$50kEnvironment$44kHealth$40kInternational$9kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k10 grants · $41k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$4,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$486k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BOTANICAL GARDEN OF THE PIEDMONT$10,000
WOODBERRY FOREST SCHOOL$10,000
COVENANT SCHOOL$5,000
Individual grant recipient$4,000
ALSAC-ST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$4,000
CROSSNORE SCHOOL & CHILDREN'S HOME$4,000
THE JEFFERSON COUNCIL$4,000
GEORGIA'S FRIENDS INC$4,000
FOCUS$4,000
MOCKINGBIRD MINISTRIES INC$4,000
SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN$4,000
SAMARITAN'S PURSE$4,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 8%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%GEORGIA'S FRIENDS INC: $4k → 8%GEORGIA'S FRIENDS INC: $3k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

65%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$221k · 11 repeat orgs$122k to everyone else

11 repeat relationships: 11 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
3

Total granted

$221k
$118k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+33%
+44%

Still filing today

73%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $4k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationReligionEnvironmentHuman ServicesCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BG
    BOTANICAL GARDEN OF THE PIEDMONT
    5× · 2020–2025 · $54k · revenue +822%
  • TC
    THE COVENANT SCHOOL INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $44k · revenue +32%
  • WF
    WOODBERRY FOREST SCHOOL
    4× · 2022–2025 · $19k · revenue +47%

Funded once

  • CE
    CHRIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH
    one grant, 2020 · $65k
  • VA
    VIRGINIA ATHLETIC FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $50k
  • LF
    LINVILLE FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $3k · revenue +44%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Walnut Grove Christian School

We are a k-12 christian school founded under the following (4) pillars: academics: we provide an amazing accredited academic program utilizing 100% certified teachers. schedule: we provide our students and their families an opportunity on…

Education
2
Portersville Christian School

The mission of portersville christian school is to glorify god by preparing students to serve christ and instilling high standards spiritually, academically, socially, and physically. the school provides a high-quality academic program, a…

Education
3
Regents School of Charlottesville Inc

Regents' mission is to provide a classical and christian education, founded upon and informed by a biblical worldview, that equips our students to know, love, and practice that which is true, good, and the beautiful and challenges them to…

Education
4
Hunter Classical Christian School

Provide an education to children in lower and middle school using classical christian methodology.

Education
5
Wofford College

The purpose of wofford college is to function as a liberal arts institution of superior quality. its chief concern is the development of an intellectual, spiritual, and aesthetic atmosphere in which serious and inquiring minds of students…

—
6
The Seed Public Charter School of Washington Dc

The seed public charter school of washington, dc is a public college-preparatory boarding school whose primary mission is to provide an outstanding intensive educational program that prepares children, both academically and socially, for…

Education
7
Washington University of Virginia

Provides seminary, under-graduate, graduate, doctoral, and other continuing education programs

—
8
Evangel University

Evangel is a comprehensive christian university that is committed to excellence in educating and equipping students to become spirit empowered servants of god who will impact the church and society globally.

Education
9
Valor Christian Schools

See schedule o.in partnership with committed parents, our mission is to provide a purpose-driven college preparatory program, within a vibrant christ-centered environment that empowers students to discover their passions and to develop…

Education
10
Washington and Lee University

Mission statement of washington and lee university: washington and lee university provides a liberal arts education that develops students' capacity to think freely, critically, and humanely and to conduct themselves with honor, integrity,…

Education
11
Hampden-Sydney College

Since 1775, the mission of Hampden-Sydney College has been to form good men and good citizens in an atmosphere of sound learning.

Education
12
Good Shepherd Episcopal School

The mission of Good Shepherd Episcopal School is to inspire each child to achieve academic excellence within a diverse, nurturing community that builds character and fosters respect for one another and our shared environment, locally and…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Mockingbird Ministries Inc; the most unlike its peers is Samaritan's Purse. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 15 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
8/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

CHRIST EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $65,000 · OtherCHRIST EPISCOPAL CHURCHVIRGINIA ATHLETIC FOUNDATION: $50,000 · OtherVIRGINIA ATHLETIC FOUNDATIONTHE COVENANT SCHOOL INC: $44,300 · OtherTHE COVENANT SCHOOL INCALSAC-ST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $12,800 · OtherALSAC-ST JUDE'S CHILDREN'S HOSPITALIndividual grant recipient: $12,800 · OtherIndividual grant recipientF O C U S INC: $12,800 · OtherF O C U S INCBOTANICAL GARDEN OF THE PIEDMONT: $54,000 · EnvironmentBOTANICAL GARDEN …CROSSNORE COMMUNITIES FOR CHILDREN: $22,800 · HealthCROSSNORE C…THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $12,800 · HealthTHE SHRINER…SAMARITAN'S PURSE: $12,800 · ReligionMOCKINGBIRD MINISTRIES INC: $10,050 · ReligionWOODBERRY FOREST SCHOOL: $18,800 · EducationLINVILLE FOUNDATION INC: $2,750 · EducationGEORGIA'S FRIENDS INC: $7,300 · Human ServicesTHE JEFFERSON COUNCIL: $4,000 · Civil Rights
Other$197,700Environment$54,000Health$35,600Religion$22,850Education$21,550Human Services$7,300Civil Rights$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetBOTANICAL GARDEN OF THE PIEDMONT: $54,000 over 5y, 1.2% of budgetTHE COVENANT SCHOOL INC: $44,300 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetCROSSNORE COMMUNITIES FOR CHILDREN: $22,800 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetWOODBERRY FOREST SCHOOL: $18,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $12,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $12,800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMOCKINGBIRD MINISTRIES INC: $10,050 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetGEORGIA'S FRIENDS INC: $7,300 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetLINVILLE FOUNDATION INC: $2,750 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds BOTANICAL GARDEN OF THE PIEDMONT ↗
  • Who funds THE COVENANT SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds CROSSNORE COMMUNITIES FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds WOODBERRY FOREST SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds MOCKINGBIRD MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds GEORGIA'S FRIENDS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JEFFERSON COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds LINVILLE FOUNDATION INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO6.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Nancy H and William J Gordon Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Nancy H and William J Gordon Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Nancy H and William J Gordon Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Nancy H and William J Gordon Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 15 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Nancy H and William J Gordon’s filings →

More from the funding graph