Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Muriel E and Edward C Wachter Charitable Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$101k
Granted FY2025still arriving
40
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it funds
0191% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$202kEducation$157kReligion$124kArts & Culture$118kAnimals$48kRecreation & Sports$48kFood & Nutrition$43kEnvironment$38kOther$0
02FY2025 · 40 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$2,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$2.9M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
VALLEY POINTS FAMILY YMCA$9,000
PEOPLE'S LIBRARY OF NEW KENSINGTON & LOWER BURRELL$9,000
OAKMONT CARNEGIE LIBRARY$6,000
PLUM COMMUNITY LIBRARY$6,000
BRAEBURN COMMUNITY CHURCH$6,000
BURTNER HOUSE$5,000
SALVATION ARMY NEW KENSINGTON CHAPTER$5,000
ANIMAL PROTECTORS ANIMAL SHELTER$5,000
RACHEL CARSON HOMESTEAD ASSOCIATION$5,000
HARMARVILLE CEMETERY ASSOC - HENDERSON CEMETERY$4,000
ALLEGHENY KISKI VALLEY HERITAGE MUSEUM$4,000
COMMUNITY LIBRARY OF ALLEGHENY VALLEY$4,000
ALLEGHENY KISKI VALLEY SENIOR CENTER$4,000
FUN & FREEDOM YOUTH SPORTS$4,000
PLUM CREEK PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $56k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 8% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%VALLEY POINTS FAMILY YMCA: $9k → 10%SPARK COMMUNITY CENTER: $500 → 10%SPARK COMMUNITY CENTER: $500 → 10%SPARK COMMUNITY CENTER: $500 → 10%SPARK COMMUNITY CENTER: $500 → 10%SPARK COMMUNITY CENTER: $500 → 10%VALLEY POINTS FAMILY YMCA: $9k → 10%SPARK COMMUNITY CENTER: $500 → 10%SPARK COMMUNITY CENTER: $500 → 10%VALLEY POINTS FAMILY YMCA: $9k → 10%SPARK COMMUNITY CENTER: $500 → 10%SPARK COMMUNITY CENTER: $500 → 10%ALLE-KISKI VALLEY SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER: $4k → 10%ALLE-KISKI VALLEY SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER: $4k → 10%ALLE-KISKI VALLEY SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER: $4k → 10%ALLE-KISKI VALLEY SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER: $4k → 10%ALLE-KISKI VALLEY SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER: $4k → 10%ALLE-KISKI VALLEY SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER: $4k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$889k · 55 repeat orgs$28k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +20% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

55 repeat relationships: 34 still active in FY2025, 21 since wound down; 6 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

55
12

Total granted

$889k
$21k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+7%

Still filing today

25%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHuman ServicesHealthFood & NutritionPhilanthropyRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PB
    PLUM BOROUGH COMMUNITY LIBRARY
    9× · 2017–2025 · $49k · revenue +19%
  • CL
    Community Library of Allegheny Valley
    9× · 2017–2025 · $31k · revenue +27%
  • AV
    ALLE-KISKI VALLEY SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $24k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • DU
    DILLARD UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2018 · $10k · revenue -75%
  • AV
    AILE-KISKI VALLEY CENTER FOR ACTIVE ADULTS
    one grant, 2024 · $4k
  • PS
    Presbyterian Seniorcare Foundationgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $3k · revenue +29%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Penn Hills Library

A welcoming community center that provides information and equitable access to space, collections, materials, programs and services that enrich the quality of life and facilitate lifelong learning.

Education
2
Western Pocono Community Library

Public Library open free of charge to all members of the community

—
3
Valley Community Library

Public lending library

—
4
Bridgeville Public Library

Bridgeville Public Library operates as a public library that provides books, videos, periodicals and other educational materials for area residents to use and borrow.

—
5
North Pocono Public Library

Public lending library

—
6
Pike County Public Library Inc

Provides free library services to residents of pike county, pennsylvania

—
7
Clairton Public Library

Operation of a public library which provides books, videos, periodicals and other eductional materials for area residents to use an borrow.

Education
8
Upper Valley Comm Health Services Inc

UVCHS in a not for profit organization that provides medical dental behavioral heath and pharmacy services. Our goal is to make quality care available to everyone regardless of demographic or economic status. We accept all major insurances…

Health
9
Public Library Association of Bethel Park

Bethel Park Public Library provides services to inform, enrich, and inspire the community through the lending of materials, programs, classes, and services such as free computer access, homebound delivery of materials, and outreach…

Education
10
Millvale Community Library

To ensure the preservation and transmission of society's knowledge, history and culture, and to provide the people of Millvale with free and open access to information for education, recreation and reference.

Education
11
Sewickley Public Library

The mission of the Sewickley Public Library is to provide lifelong learning oppurtunities to the children and adults of the greater Quaker Valley Community.

Education
12
Dorset Village Public Library Association Inc

General reading and lending library offering 24,000 titles, videos, audio books, newspapers, magazines, as well as, various programs to 3,000 residents of Dorset and smaller towns.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Valley Points Family Young Men's Christian Association; the most unlike its peers is Alle-Kiski Valley Senior Citizens Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 73 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/21
Grantees still filing
16/21
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

PEOPLE'S LIBRARY OF NEW KENSINGTON & LOWER BURRELL: $76,000 · OtherPEOPLE'S LIBRARY OF NEW KENSINGTON & LOWER BURRELLSALVATION ARMY NEW KENSINGTON CHAPTER: $62,000 · OtherSALVATION ARMY NEW KENSINGTON CHAPTERIndividual grant recipient: $53,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientOAKMONT CARNEGIE LIBRARY: $49,000 · OtherOAKMONT CARNEGIE LIBRARYYMCA - NEW KENSINGTON: $45,000 · OtherYMCA - NEW KENSINGTONRACHEL CARSON HOMESTEAD ASSOCATION INC: $37,000 · OtherBURTNER HOUSE: $36,500 · OtherALLEGHENY KISKI VALLEY HERITAGE MUSEUM: $36,000 · OtherBRAEBURN UNITED METHODIST CHURCH: $36,000 · OtherCommunity Library of Allegheny Valley: $31,000 · OtherFUN & FREEDOM YOUTH SPORTS: $30,000 · Other+49 more: $279,010 · Other+49 morePLUM BOROUGH COMMUNITY LIBRARY: $49,000 · EducationDILLARD UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · EducationGENEVA COLLEGE: $8,000 · EducationLower Burrell Meals on Wheels: $3,000 · EducationVALLEY POINTS FAMILY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $27,000 · Human ServicesALLE-KISKI VALLEY SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER INC: $24,000 · Human ServicesSPARK COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $4,500 · Human ServicesWESTMORELAND COUNTY FOOD BANK INC: $12,000 · Food & NutritionHeadrest Inc: $4,000 · HealthGood Neighbor Health Clinic Inc: $1,500 · HealthPresbyterian Seniorcare Foundation: $2,500 · Housing & ShelterBURRELL BASEBALL ASSOCIATION: $1,050 · Recreation & SportsMONTSHIRE MUSEUM OF SCIENCE INC: $500 · Philanthropy
Other$770,510Education$70,000Human Services$55,500Food & Nutrition$12,000Health$5,500Housing & Shelter$2,500Recreation & Sports$1,050Philanthropy$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPLUM BOROUGH COMMUNITY LIBRARY: $49,000 over 9y, 2.0% of budgetCommunity Library of Allegheny Valley: $31,000 over 9y, 0.9% of budgetVALLEY POINTS FAMILY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION: $27,000 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetALLE-KISKI VALLEY SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER INC: $24,000 over 6y, 0.8% of budgetUNITY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT: $13,000 over 9y, 1.4% of budgetWESTMORELAND COUNTY FOOD BANK INC: $12,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetDILLARD UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGENEVA COLLEGE: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSPARK COMMUNITY CENTER INC: $4,500 over 9y, 0.6% of budgetHeadrest Inc: $4,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetVETERANS HOME ASSN VFW POST 92: $3,500 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetLower Burrell Meals on Wheels: $3,000 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetPresbyterian Seniorcare Foundation: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUPPER VALLEY HAVEN: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetGood Neighbor Health Clinic Inc: $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetBURRELL BASEBALL ASSOCIATION: $1,050 over 3y, 0.6% of budgetNORTH HILLS COMMUNITY OUTREACH INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTRI-CITY LIFE CENTER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMONTSHIRE MUSEUM OF SCIENCE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FAMILY PLACE INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHOWE LIBRARY CORPORATION: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PLUM BOROUGH COMMUNITY LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds Community Library of Allegheny Valley ↗
  • Who funds VALLEY POINTS FAMILY YOUNG MEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds ALLE-KISKI VALLEY SENIOR CITIZENS CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITY VOLUNTEER FIRE DEPARTMENT ↗
  • Who funds WESTMORELAND COUNTY FOOD BANK INC ↗
  • Who funds DILLARD UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds GENEVA COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SPARK COMMUNITY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Headrest Inc ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

New Hampshire Charitable FoundationNH16.6× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: New Hampshire Charitable Foundation · Emily Landecker Foundation Inc · The Couch Family Foundation · Mascoma Bank Foundation · The Pittsburgh Foundation · John M Shapiro Charitable Trust · The Help for People Foundation · Schon Family Foundation · Frank and Brinna Sands Foundation · The Vermont Community Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Muriel E and Edward C Wachter Charitable Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Muriel E and Edward C Wachter Charitable Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 38%
  • The Family Place Inc: 38% of income from government
  • Upper Valley Haven: 38% of income from government
  • Montshire Museum of Science Inc: 4% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Muriel E and Edward C Wachter Charitable Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Muriel E and Edward C Wachter Charitable Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 73 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Muriel E and Edward C Wachter’s filings →

More from the funding graph