Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Mufson Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$52k
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$9k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

International$80kPhilanthropy$55kCrime & Legal$54kPublic Benefit$33kHealth$32kYouth Development$24kPublic Safety & Disaster$23kArts & Culture$20kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$4,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$468k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTRAL JERSEY LEGAL SERVICES INC$8,500
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$8,000
BRC (FORMERLY BOWERY RESIDENTS COMMITTEE)$6,000
AMERICARES$5,000
SPUR LOCAL$5,000
DOCTORS WITHOUT BORDERS$4,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA$4,000
THE NEW YORK TIMES COMMUNITIES FUND (FORMERLY THE NEEDIEST CASES FUND)$3,000
COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY (DOUBLE DISCOVERY)$2,500
GIRLS INC$2,000
LEVINE MUSIC$1,500
EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE$1,500
THE STUDIO THEATRE$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–22, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 23%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%SPRINGBOARD TO OPPORTUNITIES: $2k → 23%SPRINGBOARD TO OPPORTUNITIES: $2k → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
OR
NJ
CT
CA
DC
MS
AL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

100%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$353k · 22 repeat orgs$0 to everyone else

22 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

22
0

Total granted

$353k
$0

Still filing today

73%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
InternationalPhilanthropyHealthArts & CultureCivil RightsCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CJ
    CENTRAL JERSEY LEGAL SERVICES INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $45k · revenue +137%
  • MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $37k · revenue +98%
  • SL
    SPUR LOCAL INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $36k · revenue +15%

Funded once

    How this is measured

    Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

    04Its field

    Closest unfunded matches

    The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

    1
    Actionaid Usa

    Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

    Social Science
    2
    Waterorg

    Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

    International
    3
    Partnersglobal

    Partnersglobal (partners) works through a global network to support local leaders and create partnerships that transform conflict, strengthen democratic institutions, and achieve sustainable development.

    International
    4
    Middle East Investment Initiative Inc

    Middle east investment initiative, inc. (meii) stimulates sustainable economic activity and long-lasting job creation in the middle east and north africa (mena) by designing and deploying finance and technical assistance programs to…

    Community Improvement
    5
    Npr International Operations Inc

    Npr international operations, inc. ("nprio") supports the international newsgathering activities of national public radio, inc. through bureaus and offices established locally in foreign countries.

    —
    6
    Metropolitan Jewish Health System Inc

    Mjhs health system is a charitable not-for-profit established to support the activities of affiliated organizations. mjhs is built on the core values of compassion, dignity and respect, first established by the four brooklyn ladies in…

    Health
    7
    Fajr Scientific

    To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.

    Science & Tech
    8
    Guernica Centre for InternationalJustice

    The Guernica Centre for International Justice represents the interests of victims in national and international legal proceedings, putting in place transnational accountability strategies that seek to maximize the protection of victims'…

    International
    9
    Pact Inc

    Pact is a nonprofit organization that builds evidence-based, data-driven, and community-led solutions for human development (continued in schedule o)

    International
    10
    Devworks International

    Devworks international is dedicated to a society where all people enjoy the freedom to pursue their own sustainable development. we contribute to this by strengthening the capacity of local organizations.

    Human Services
    11
    Pro Publica Inc

    Pro publica is an independent, non-profit, pulitzer prize-winning newsroom that produces investigative journalism in the public interest. our work focuses exclusively on truly important stories. [see continuation on schedule o] we produce…

    Arts & Culture
    12
    Accion International

    Our mission is to create a fair and inclusive economy where underserved people have quality financial choices and opportunities to improve their economic well-being. we find and help build innovative companies with the potential to reach…

    International
    How this is measured
    The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Medecins Sans Frontieres Usa Inc; the most unlike its peers is International Rescue Committee Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
    04the grantee network

    16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

    Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

    How this is measured

    Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

    Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

    0
    Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
    1
    Early backer (in before they grew)
    16/16
    Grantees still filing
    12/16
    Grew since first funded

    Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

    MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $36,500 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INCAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $31,000 · InternationalAMERICARES FOUNDATION INCWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $23,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INCInternational Rescue Committee INC: $10,000 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee I…+1 more: $2,250 · InternationalBRC (FORMERLY BOWERY RESIDENTS COMMITTEE): $32,500 · OtherBRC (FORMERLY BOWERY RESIDENT…COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY DOUBLE DISCOVERY CENTER: $15,000 · OtherCOLUMBIA UNIVERSITY DOUBLE DI…LEVINE SCHOOL OF MUSIC-ANNUAL FUND: $9,000 · OtherLEVINE SCHOOL OF MUSIC-ANNUAL…A BETTER CHANCE FOUNDATION: $8,000 · OtherA BETTER CHANCE FOUNDATIONTHE NEW YORK TIMES COMMUNITIES FUND (FORMERLY THE NEEDIEST CASES FUND): $6,000 · OtherTHE NEW YORK TIMES COMMUNITIE…COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY (DOUBLE DISCOVERY): $5,000 · OtherCOLUMBIA UNIVERSITY (DOUBLE D…The Studio Theatre Inc: $8,000 · OtherThe Studio Theatre IncSPRINGBOARD TO OPPORTUNITIES: $4,000 · Other+1 more: $3,000 · OtherSPUR LOCAL INC: $36,100 · PhilanthropySPUR LOCAL INCTHE NEW YORK TIMES COMMUNITIES FUND: $22,500 · PhilanthropyTHE NEW YORK TIMES…CENTRAL JERSEY LEGAL SERVICES INC: $45,000 · Crime & LegalCENTRAL JERSEY…PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $24,000 · HealthBLACK WOMEN FOR WELLNESS: $4,000 · HealthGIRLS INC: $16,000 · Youth DevelopmentEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $8,500 · Civil RightsTREVOR PROJECT INC: $4,000 · Civil Rights
    International$102,750Other$90,500Philanthropy$58,600Crime & Legal$45,000Health$28,000Youth Development$16,000Civil Rights$12,500

    Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

    25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCENTRAL JERSEY LEGAL SERVICES INC: $45,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $36,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSPUR LOCAL INC: $36,100 over 8y, 0.6% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $31,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $24,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $23,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetTHE NEW YORK TIMES COMMUNITIES FUND: $22,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGIRLS INC: $16,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC: $10,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $8,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetThe Studio Theatre Inc: $8,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSPRINGBOARD TO OPPORTUNITIES: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTREVOR PROJECT INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBLACK WOMEN FOR WELLNESS: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetLEVINE MUSIC INC: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMercy Corps: $2,250 over 3y, 0.0% of budget
    Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

    A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

    • Who funds CENTRAL JERSEY LEGAL SERVICES INC ↗
    • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
    • Who funds SPUR LOCAL INC ↗
    • Who funds AMERICARES FOUNDATION INC ↗
    • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
    • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
    • Who funds THE NEW YORK TIMES COMMUNITIES FUND ↗
    • Who funds GIRLS INC ↗
    • Who funds International Rescue Committee INC ↗
    • Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
    • Who funds The Studio Theatre Inc ↗
    • Who funds SPRINGBOARD TO OPPORTUNITIES ↗
    • Who funds TREVOR PROJECT INC ↗
    • Who funds BLACK WOMEN FOR WELLNESS ↗
    • Who funds LEVINE MUSIC INC ↗
    • Who funds Mercy Corps ↗

    Co-funders

    Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

    National Philanthropic TrustPA9.7× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

    Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

    How this is measured
    Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

    How much its grantees rely on government

    Each dot is one organization The Mufson Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Mufson Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

    2024
    ’20’21’22’23’24’25
    no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →median 3%
    • Mercy Corps: 47% of income from government
    • Central Jersey Legal Services Inc: 3% of income from government
    • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mufson Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph