Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Mr & Mrs Robert N Chapman Son Robert B Chapman Charitable Trust

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$28k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$28k
Largest
01What you fund
0196% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Human Services$53kPhilanthropy$28kFood & Nutrition$23kReligion$14kEducation$3kHealth$2kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$28,356
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
STEPHEN W & MERLE DRESNER CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$28,356
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY21–23, $13k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%Tri-County Community Action Agency: $3k → 14%TRI-COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCE: $9k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

55%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$69k · 4 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +157% since the first grant, against +98% for the ones you funded once.

4 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
9

Total granted

$69k
$27k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+157%
+98%

Still filing today

75%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $28k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24
PhilanthropyHuman ServicesHealthOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TJ
    THE JONNYCAKE CENTER INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $23k · revenue +157%
  • NORTH KINGSTOWN FOOD PANTRY INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $23k · revenue +276%
  • TRI-COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY
    2× · 2021–2023 · $13k · revenue +20%

Funded once

  • SM
    ST MARY'S STAR OF THE SEA
    one grant, 2023 · $6k
  • SOJOURNER HOUSE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $5k · revenue +98%
  • SM
    Saint Mary's Star of the Sea
    one grant, 2020 · $4k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Jamestown Community Food Pantry

We seek to minimize hunger and provide nutritional sustenanc

Food & Nutrition
2
Ri Center Assisting Those in Need

To provide with dignity, emergency food and outreach to thousands of at-risk neighbors in southern rhode island and surrounding communities.

Human Services
3
The Jonnycake Center of Westerly Inc

The jonnycake center of westerly provides comprehensive assistance in westerly, charlestown, richmond and hopkinton, rhode island. the services provided include: food, clothing, household items, as well as educational and financial…

Unclassified
4
Westbay Community Action Inc

To organize, plan and provide social services to low income and elderly individuals.

5
St Vincent Depaul Middletown

St. vincent depaul middletown (svdm) was founded in 1980 by the sisters of mercy and the catholic diocese of norwich. svdm's mission is to provide food, shelter and basic human services to poor and homeless individuals regardless of race,…

6
Jersey Strong Foundation
Philanthropy
7
Emergency Food Aid in Southbury

Providing food assistance to Southbury residents demonstrating need.

8
St Francis House

St. Francis House provides food clothing and necessities at no cost to people with low income or experiencing homelessness in King County Washington. Single men women and families are welcome.

9
Merrimack Valley Food Bank Inc

The focus of the merrimack valley food bank is to help meet a person's most profound need - adequate nutrition and freedom from hunger. only through cooperative efforts can society initiate change, develop strategies to alleviate hunger,…

Food & Nutrition
10
Western Maine Community Action Inc

To advocate for, strengthen, and coordinate all resources private, local, state, and federal that will assist us in promoting the self-sufficiency of people. a belief in basic human dignity and the exercise of free choice motivates the…

Human Services
11
Better Lives Rhode Island

Better lives rhode island is a non-profit agency whose mission is to offer stability, justice, and hope to those in need through advocacy and direct service.

12
Community Resource Center Inc

The mission of the community resource center (crc) is to serve all individuals and families by connecting them to resources that improve their lives. the crc is a community based human services organization that was formed in 1987 when a…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Jonnycake Center Inc and the most unlike its peers is Stephen W & Merle Dresner Charitable Foundation C/O John Marginson. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 14 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
7/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

THE JONNYCAKE CENTER INC — $22,500 · OtherTHE JONNYCAKE CENTER INCNORTH KINGSTOWN FOOD PANTRY INC — $22,500 · OtherNORTH KINGSTOWN FOOD PANTRY INCSOUTH COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION INC — $11,000 · OtherSOUTH COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION INCST MARY'S STAR OF THE SEA — $6,000 · OtherST MARY'S STAR OF THE SEASOJOURNER HOUSE INC — $5,000 · OtherSOJOURNER HOUSE INCSaint Mary's Star of the Sea — $3,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $3,000 · Other+4 more — $7,500 · Other+4 moreSTEPHEN W & MERLE DRESNER CHARITABLE FOUNDATION C/O JOHN MARGINSON — $28,356 · PhilanthropySTEPHEN W & MERLE DRESNER…TRI-COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY — $12,500 · Human ServicesTRI-COUNTY …THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH — $2,000 · Health
Other$81,000Philanthropy$28,356Human Services$12,500Health$2,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSTEPHEN W & MERLE DRESNER CHARITABLE FOUNDATION C/O JOHN MARGINSON — $28,356 over 1y, 6.7% of budgetTHE JONNYCAKE CENTER INC — $22,500 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetNORTH KINGSTOWN FOOD PANTRY INC — $22,500 over 6y, 1.1% of budgetTRI-COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION AGENCY — $12,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTH COUNTY COMMUNITY ACTION INC — $11,000 over 3y, 0.9% of budgetSOJOURNER HOUSE INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMCAULEY CORPORATION — $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

United Way of Rhode Island IncRI17.7× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: United Way of Rhode Island Inc · Rhode Island Community Food Bank Association · Washington Trust Co Charitable Fdn · The Champlin Foundation · The Rhode Island Community Foundation · Stephen W & Merle Dresner Charitable Foundation C/O John Marginson · Centreville Savings Bank Charitable Foundation · Citizens Charitable Foundation · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Mr & Mrs Robert N Chapman Son Robert B Chapman Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 14 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph