· Private foundation
The Mpd Higgins Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k16 grants · $21k
- $10k–50k3 grants · $60k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BAKER SENIOR CENTER NAPLES | $35,000 |
| MARIMED FOUNDATION | $15,000 |
| PARKER SCHOOL | $10,000 |
| GRASS VALLEY CHARTER SCHOOL | $5,000 |
| UC DAVIS HEALTH | $2,500 |
| SEA EDUCATION ASSOCIATION | $2,500 |
| MAYO CLINIC | $2,500 |
| BANCROFT SCHOOL | $1,500 |
| MILTON ACADEMY | $1,000 |
| THOROUGHBRED PLACEMENT RESOURCES | $1,000 |
| TUCK SCHOOL OF BUSINESS | $1,000 |
| DANA FARBER CANCER CENTER | $500 |
| HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK | $500 |
| GULFSHORE PLAYHOUSE | $500 |
| PATHWAYS INC | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY23–25, $65k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
30 repeat relationships — 14 still active in FY2025, 16 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 98% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PSPARKER SCHOOL6× · 2020–2025 · $110k · revenue +36%
- BSBAKER SENIOR CENTER NAPLES INC3× · 2023–2025 · $65k · revenue +17%
- NBNAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC4× · 2020–2024 · $6k · revenue +167%
Funded once
- HHHUDSON HOAGLAND SOCIETY &one grant, 2023 · $5k
- UOUNIVERISTY OF CAL SAN DIEGOone grant, 2024 · $3k
- NCNAPLES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL INCone grant, 2022 · $2k · revenue +15%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.
See Form 990, Part I, Line 1, Description of Organization Mission.
Dickinson college provides a useful, innovative and interdisciplinary education in the liberal arts and sciences to prepare students to lead rich and fulfilling lives of engaged global citizenship
To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.
The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Mitchell college educates students through a highly individualized educational approach that brings forward each student's potential, reveals their strengths, and fosters personal growth.
Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.
Bates is a college of the liberal arts and sciences, and is a coeducational, nonsectarian, residential college with special commitments to academic rigor, and to assuring in all of its efforts the dignity of each individual, and access to…
As a diverse community of learners, we cultivate integrity, curiosity, connection and resilience.
Mcphs university prepares students for careers in health care through teaching, scholarship, research, professional service and community engagement.
Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Naples Botanical Garden Inc and the most unlike its peers is Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 46 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
30 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 30 of the 47 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PARKER SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds BAKER SENIOR CENTER NAPLES INC ↗
- Who funds MARIMED FOUNDATION FOR ISLAND HEALTH CARE TRAINING ↗
- Who funds THOROUGHBRED PLACEMENT RESOURCES INC ↗
- Who funds SEA EDUCATION ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
- Who funds President and Fellows of Harvard College ↗
- Who funds NAPLES BOTANICAL GARDEN INC ↗
- Who funds BANCROFT SCHOOL ↗
- Who funds MILTON ACADEMY ↗
- Who funds AUSTEN RIGGS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds ARTIS-NAPLES INC ↗
- Who funds NAPLES COMMUNITY HOSPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds Civitas Citizens Inc ↗
- Who funds THE COLORADO COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds THE CORPORATION OF YADDO ↗
- Who funds HARRY CHAPIN FOOD BANK OF SOUTHWEST FLORIDA INC ↗
- Who funds Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc ↗
- Who funds MARYLAND HORSE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF THE SMITH COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds ROTCH-JONES-DUFF HOUSE AND GARDEN MUSEUM INC ↗
- Who funds UNIVERSITY OF NEBRASKA FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds PARK SCHOOL CORPORATION ↗
- Who funds MATTAPOISETT COMMUNITY SAILING ASSOCINC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Boston Foundation Inc · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Ge Aerospace Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Mpd Higgins Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Sea Education Association Inc — 12% of income from government
- President and Fellows of Harvard College — 7% of income from government
- Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc — 7% of income from government
- Naples Botanical Garden Inc — 3% of income from government
- Rotch-Jones-Duff House and Garden Museum Inc — 1% of income from government
- The Trustees of the Smith College — 1% of income from government
- Gulfshore Playhouse Inc — 0% of income from government
- Naples Community Hospital Inc — 0% of income from government
- Milton Academy — 0% of income from government
- Austen Riggs Center Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.