Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Mountz Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$362k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$280k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Science & Tech$672kHealth$664kCommunity Improvement$600kEducation$510kSocial Science$210kEnvironment$25kPublic Benefit$10kFood & Nutrition$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $10k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $72k
  • $250k+1 grant · $280k
$12,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$934k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MIT$280,000
DEERFIELD ACADEMY$25,000
BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL$22,200
THE FENN SCHOOL$12,500
CARROLL SCHOOL$12,500
NATIONAL INVENTORS HALL OF FAME$5,000
THE UMBRELLA ARTS CENTER$2,500
PAN MASS CHALLENGE$1,000
KHAN ACADEMY$1,000
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, your grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 99% of your dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%NASHOBA BROOKS SCHOOL: $27k → 8%NASHOBA REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT: $20k → 11%DEERFIELD ACADEMY: $25k → 14%Boston Children's Hospital: $100k → 16%COTTONWOOD LEADERSHIP FUND: $10k → 15%NATIONAL INVENTORS HALL OF FAME: $5k → 13%FAMILY REACH FOUNDATION: $14k → 4%NASHOBA BROOKS SCHOOL: $20k → 8%BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $100k → 16%NATIONAL INVENTORS HALL OF FAME: $5k → 13%NASHOBA BROOKS SCHOOL: $5k → 8%BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL: $3k → 16%CARROLL SCHOOL: $13k → 8%BRIGHAM AND WOMEN'S HOSPITAL: $3k → 16%CARROLL SCHOOL: $10k → 8%BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $3k → 16%CARROLL SCHOOL: $10k → 8%NASHOBA BROOKS SCHOOL: $30k → 8%NASHOBA BROOKS SCHOOL: $25k → 8%HBS FUND FOR LEADERSHIP & INNOVATION: $200k → 16%THE FENN SCHOOL: $13k → 8%HBS FUND FOR LEADERSHIP & INNOVATION: $200k → 16%THE FENN SCHOOL: $13k → 8%Harvard Business School: $200k → 16%THE FENN SCHOOL: $10k → 8%HBS FUND FOR LEADERSHIP & INNOVATION: $200k → 16%HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL: $10k → 16%MIT: $280k → 8%MIT: $280k → 8%Massachusetts Institute of Technology: $200k → 8%BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $164k → 16%Massachusetts Institute of Technology: $50k → 8%BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $161k → 16%SANDBOX INNOVATION FUND: $50k → 8%BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $23k → 16%MIT: $20k → 8%BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $22k → 16%MIT: $10k → 8%BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL TRUST: $15k → 16%MIT: $10k → 8%BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL: $15k → 16%MIT: $10k → 8%BOSTON CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL TRUST: $11k → 16%LMS Fund to Preserve the LMS Woods: $25k → 8%LEXINGTON MONTESSORI SCHOOL: $25k → 8%Lexington Montessori School: $4k → 8%LEXINGTON MONTESSORI SCHOOL: $3k → 8%LEXINGTON MONTESSORI SCHOOL: $3k → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

MN
MA
OH
NJ
CA
VA
AZ
KS

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

94%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.3M · 15 repeat orgs$148k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +46% since the first grant, against -7% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 8 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
10

Total granted

$2.3M
$123k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+46%
-7%

Still filing today

53%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthPhilanthropyArts & CultureOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CH
    Children's Hospital Corporation
    9× · 2017–2025 · $621k · revenue +69%
  • NB
    NASHOBA BROOKS SCHOOL OF CONCORD INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $107k · revenue +6%
  • LM
    LEXINGTON MONTESSORI SCHOOL INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $35k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • SI
    SANDBOX INNOVATION FUND
    one grant, 2018 · $50k
  • LF
    LMS Fund to Preserve the LMS Woods
    one grant, 2017 · $25k
  • NR
    NASHOBA REGIONAL SCHOOL DISTRICT
    one grant, 2020 · $20k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

2
Trustees of Dartmouth College

Dartmouth College educates the most promising students and prepares them for a lifetime of learning and of responsible leadership, through a faculty dedicated to teaching and the creation of knowledge.

Education
3
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
4
The Peak School

The peak school seeks to ignite a passion for learning, to develop students of diverse talents and backgrounds who think critically and act with integrity, and to graduate compassionate, confident, capable students who will embrace their…

Education
5
Breck School

We create confident learners who lead lives of intellectual curiosity, self-knowledge, and social responsibility.

Education
6
Northfield Mount Hermon School

Northfield mount hermon educates the head, heart and hands of our students. we engage their intellect, compassion, and talents, empowering them to act with humanity and purpose.

Education
7
Darrow School

Darrow school is dedicated to serving students with diverse backgrounds and abilities, building on each student's talents and interests to inspire enduring confidence for success in college and life. this mission is accomplished through…

Education
8
Pembroke Hill School

A preschool through 12th grade, private, college preparatory school. the school's mission statement is "together, cultivating the best in each for the benefit of all."

Education
9
Meadowbrook School of Weston Incorporated

Meadowbrook knows, loves, and challenges every child. together, as a diverse community with high academic, ethical and social standards, we nurture character, promote confidence, inspire creativity and foster critical thinking skills as we…

Education
10
Mark Day School

Innovative and full of heart, mark day school nurtures each child to pursue their curiosity, think critically, embrace challenge with courage and joy, and work in partnership with others to build more caring and inclusive communities.

11
Trustees of Boston University

Organization's mission: boston university is an international, comprehensive, private research university, committed to educating students to be reflective, resourceful individuals ready to live, adapt, and lead in an interconnected world.…

12
Children's Hospital Pathology Foundation Inc

The Foundation's mission is to provide pathology services primarily to patients at Boston Children's Hospital and at satellite locations. The Foundation carries on and promotes basic and applied medical research and education in the field…

Health

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Trustees of Deerfield Academy and the most unlike its peers is Cottonwood Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
10/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

MIT — $610,100 · OtherMITHBS FUND FOR LEADERSHIP & INNOVATION — $600,000 · OtherHBS FUND FOR LEADERSHIP & INNOVATIONHarvard Business School — $210,000 · OtherHarvard Business School+12 more — $179,478 · Other+12 moreChildren's Hospital Corporation — $620,775 · HealthChildren's Hospital Corpor…+2 more — $15,800 · HealthMassachusetts Institute of Technology — $250,000 · EducationMassachusetts Insti…NASHOBA BROOKS SCHOOL OF CONCORD INC — $106,800 · EducationNASHOBA BROOKS SCHO…LEXINGTON MONTESSORI SCHOOL INC — $35,200 · EducationLEXINGTON MONTESSOR…THE CARROLL SCHOOL — $32,500 · EducationTHE CARROLL SCHOOLTRUSTEES OF DEERFIELD ACADEMY — $25,000 · EducationTRUSTEES OF DEERFIE…+3 more — $4,100 · EducationNATIONAL INVENTORS HALL OF FAME INC — $12,000 · Arts & CultureCOTTONWOOD FOUNDATION — $1,680 · Philanthropy
Other$1,599,578Health$636,575Education$453,600Arts & Culture$12,000Philanthropy$1,680

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetChildren's Hospital Corporation — $620,775 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMassachusetts Institute of Technology — $250,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNASHOBA BROOKS SCHOOL OF CONCORD INC — $106,800 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetLEXINGTON MONTESSORI SCHOOL INC — $35,200 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetTHE FENN SCHOOL — $35,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetTHE CARROLL SCHOOL — $32,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTRUSTEES OF DEERFIELD ACADEMY — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY REACH FOUNDATION — $13,800 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL INVENTORS HALL OF FAME INC — $12,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC — $9,050 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetKHAN ACADEMY INC — $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOTTONWOOD FOUNDATION — $1,680 over 1y, 15% of budgetMATHCOUNTS Foundation — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE BOSTON ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION — $395 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Children's Hospital Corporation
  • Who funds Massachusetts Institute of Technology
  • Who funds NASHOBA BROOKS SCHOOL OF CONCORD INC
  • Who funds LEXINGTON MONTESSORI SCHOOL INC
  • Who funds THE FENN SCHOOL
  • Who funds THE CARROLL SCHOOL
  • Who funds TRUSTEES OF DEERFIELD ACADEMY
  • Who funds FAMILY REACH FOUNDATION
  • Who funds NATIONAL INVENTORS HALL OF FAME INC
  • Who funds PAN-MASSACHUSETTS CHALLENGE INC
  • Who funds KHAN ACADEMY INC
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC
  • Who funds COTTONWOOD FOUNDATION
  • Who funds MATHCOUNTS Foundation
  • Who funds THE BOSTON ATHLETIC ASSOCIATION
  • Who funds The Side-Out Foundation

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Fidelity FoundationMA13× affinity4 shared granteesties to 10 of 10Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Fidelity Foundation · Boston Foundation Inc · Verizon Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Mountz Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 70%1%4%8%15%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 10%
  • Massachusetts Institute of Technology35% of income from government
  • Children's Hospital Corporation10% of income from government
  • Pan-Massachusetts Challenge Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
1report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph