Skip to content
The Moskowitz Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Moskowitz Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$324k
Granted FY2025still arriving
6
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$271k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead

Read this first · the figures below need context

87% of The Moskowitz Family Foundation Inc’s FY2025 grant dollars went to National Philanthropic Trust, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 2 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

4
’17
4
’18
1
’19
2
’20
1
’21
1
’22
3
’23
1
’24
2
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$1.0MPhilanthropy$364kRecreation & Sports$87kSocial Science$60kHealth$22kReligion$7kArts & Culture$3k
02FY2025 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $3k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $50k
  • $250k+1 grant · $271k
$15,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST$271,396
TURTLE ATHLETIC FOUNDATION$25,000
SAFELY BACK HOME$15,000
HARVARD UNIVERSITY$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION$2,500
TEMPLE BETH ISRAEL$180
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 9%, against an area that typically sits at 8%. 60% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 8%HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL: $10k → 16%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $271k → 7%TEMPLE BETH ISRAEL: $2k → 9%TURTLE ATHLETIC FOUNDATION: $25k → 10%VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY: $5k → 14%NEW JERSEY YOUTH CHORUS: $3k → 4%SAFELY BACK HOME: $15k → 6%KENT PLACE SCHOOL: $5k → 10%MCINTIRE SCHOOL OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION: $1k → 8%BPS FOUNDATION: $65k → 13%UMCP FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL: $10k → 16%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $119k → 7%TEMPLE BETH ISRAEL: $180 → 9%TURTLE ATHLETIC FOUNDATION: $20k → 10%VANDERBILT UNIVERSITY: $5k → 14%CHRIS CHURCH SUMMIT: $3k → 10%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION: $20k → 11%HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL: $10k → 16%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $100k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND ALUMNI ASSOCIATION: $5k → 11%HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL: $10k → 16%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $69k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL: $5k → 16%NATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $45k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION: $181k → 11%HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL: $5k → 16%NATIONAL PHILANTROPIC TRUST: $30k → 7%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION: $166k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION: $108k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION: $81k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION: $80k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION: $62k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION: $45k → 11%TURTLE ATHETIC FOUNDATION: $20k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION: $12k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION: $12k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION: $10k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION: $5k → 11%UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION: $3k → 11%TURTLE ATHLETIC FOUNDATION: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NY
MA
NV
PA
NJ
VA
MD
TN
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.1M · 6 repeat orgs$118k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +72% since the first grant, against -35% for those funded once.

6 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

6
9

Total granted

$1.1M
$103k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+72%
-35%

Still filing today

50%
44%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthYouth DevelopmentPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $788k · revenue +72%
  • KP
    KENT PLACE SCHOOL
    3× · 2017–2020 · $216k · revenue +59%
  • Vanderbilt University
    2× · 2017–2018 · $10k · revenue +74%

Funded once

  • BF
    BPS FOUNDATIONgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $65k · revenue +194%
  • TA
    TURTLE ATHETIC FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND ALUMNI ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2018 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Trustees of Princeton University

Research, education and general - princeton university is a private not-for-profit, non-sectarian institution of higher learning with approximately 5,700 undergraduate and 3,300 graduate students. 2,500 students graduated in the 2024-2025…

Education
2
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
3
Jefferson Scholars Foundation

The jefferson scholars foundation (foundation) provides academic merit-based scholarship, fellowship and professorship support to students and faculty at the university of virginia (uva).

Philanthropy
4
Stony Brook Internists University Faculty Practice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
5
Massachusetts Institute of Technology

The mission of mit is to advance knowledge and educate students in science, technology, and other areas of scholarship that will best serve the nation and the world in the 21st century.

Education
6
Mcphs University

Mcphs university prepares students for careers in health care through teaching, scholarship, research, professional service and community engagement.

Education
7
Saint Peter's University

See schedule o.saint peter's university, inspired by its jesuit, catholic identity, commitment to individual attention, and grounding in the liberal arts, educates a diverse community of learners in undergraduate, graduate and professional…

Education
8
University of Maryland Physicians Pa

Under the medical service plan of the university of maryland school of medicine, medical services are rendered by the members of the faculty on behalf of the school of medicine in connection with their duties to provide clinical…

—
9
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
10
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
11
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
12
Northeast College of Health Sciences

Northeast college of health sciences (the college) is committed to academic excellence, leadership, and professional best practices in the health sciences.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is University of Maryland College Park Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Safely Back Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

11 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 11 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/11
Grantees still filing
7/11
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC: $787,813 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INCKENT PLACE SCHOOL: $216,385 · EducationKENT PLACE SCHOOL+3 more: $21,000 · EducationNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $634,105 · PhilanthropyNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST+1 more: $1,100 · PhilanthropyBPS FOUNDATION: $65,000 · OtherBPS FOUNDATI…HARVARD BUSINESS SCHOOL: $60,000 · OtherHARVARD BUSI…TURTLE ATHLETIC FOUNDATION: $45,000 · OtherTURTLE ATHLE…TURTLE ATHETIC FOUNDATION: $20,000 · OtherTURTLE ATHET…+5 more: $14,180 · Other+5 moreSAFELY BACK HOME: $15,000 · Public Safety & DisasterTURTLE ATHLETIC FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · Youth DevelopmentCHILDREN'S CANCER AND BLOOD FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 · Health
Education$1,025,198Philanthropy$635,205Other$204,180Public Safety & Disaster$15,000Youth Development$2,000Health$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF MARYLAND COLLEGE PARK FOUNDATION INC: $787,813 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetNATIONAL PHILANTHROPIC TRUST: $634,105 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetKENT PLACE SCHOOL: $216,385 over 3y, 0.5% of budgetBPS FOUNDATION: $65,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetPresident and Fellows of Harvard College: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVanderbilt University: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW JERSEY YOUTH CHORUS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetTURTLE ATHLETIC FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCHILDREN'S CANCER AND BLOOD FOUNDATION INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOMMUNITY FOUNDATION OF NEW JERSEY: $1,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF VIRGINIA MCINTIRE SCHOOL OF COMMERCE FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropi…American Endowment Fo…Fidelity Investments …Donor Advised Charita…Amazonsmile Foundation
National Philanthropic TrustPA10.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · American Endowment Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Moskowitz Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Moskowitz Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Moskowitz Family Foundation Inc?

    Find your warmest path to The Moskowitz Family Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Moskowitz Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home