Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Morris Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$46k
Granted FY2024still arriving
19
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$83kEducation$74kHealth$9kInternational$5kReligion$4kHuman Services$4kEnvironment$3kRecreation & Sports$3kOther$0
02FY2024 · 19 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k17 grants · $26k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $20k
$1,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$682k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$10,000
MOUNTAINSIDE SCHOOL$10,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
WHRDA$5,000
LINCOLN CENTER FOR PERFORMING ARTS$3,000
THE MORGAN LIBRARY$2,000
MUSEUM OF ART AND DESIGN$1,500
THE MUSEUM OF MODERN ART$1,100
FAMILY FRIENDS OF PACK 468$1,000
CREATIVE GROWTH ART CENTER$1,000
FILM FORUM$550
RUTH ACTY SCHOOL$500
SOLOMON R GUGGENHEIM FOUNDATION$500
STEP ONE SCHOOL$500
THE RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$250
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY21–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 70% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%STEP ONE SCHOOL: $500 → 9%THE HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $1k → 17%HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $150 → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
MA
OR
NJ
CA
UT
CO
VA
MD
AR
TN
DC
AL
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

64%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$163k · 23 repeat orgs$91k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +48% since the first grant, against +9% for those funded once.

23 repeat relationships: 14 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

23
26

Total granted

$163k
$88k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+48%
+9%

Still filing today

52%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’21’22’23’24
Arts & CultureEducationHuman ServicesEnvironmentInternationalHealthOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MT
    MANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC
    2× · 2022–2023 · $6k · revenue +43%
  • TJ
    THE JEWISH MUSEUM
    2× · 2021–2023 · $3k · revenue +48%
  • SR
    SOLOMON R GUGGENHEIM FOUNDATION
    4× · 2021–2024 · $2k · revenue +21%

Funded once

  • AA
    ASPEN ART MUSEUM
    one grant, 2023 · $25k · revenue -68%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2021 · $20k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Museum of the City of New York

The museum of the city of new york fosters understanding of the distinctive nature of urban life in the world's most influential metropolis. it engages visitors by celebrating, documenting, and interpreting the city's past, present, and…

Arts & Culture
2
American Museum of Natural History

The museum's mission statement is: "to discover, interpret, and disseminate - through scientific research and education - knowledge about human cultures, the natural world, and the universe."

Arts & Culture
3
The Pierpont Morgan Library

The Morgan Library & Museum celebrates and shares the history and process of human creativity from antiquity to the present day through the preservation, study, and interpretation of a dynamic and growing collection.

Education
4
Philadelphia Museum of Art

The philadelphia museum of art - in partnership with the city, the region, and art museums around the globe - seeks to preserve, enhance, interpret, and extend the reach of its great collection in particular, and the visual arts in…

Arts & Culture
5
The Neue Galerie New York
Arts & Culture
6
San Diego Museum of Art

To inspire, educate and cultivate curiosity through great works of art.

Arts & Culture
7
The Brooklyn Institute of Arts and Sciences

The mission of the brooklyn institute of arts and sciences, d/b/a brooklyn museum (the "museum") is to bring people together through art and experiences that inspire celebration, compassion, courage, and the will to act. (see schedule o).

Arts & Culture
8
Clyfford Still Museum

Home to the art and legacy of the american painter clyfford still, we invite all to explore the potential of individual creative endeavor.

Arts & Culture
9
Kadist Collection Manager Inc
Arts & Culture
10
Isabella Stewart Gardner Museum Inc

Organization's mission statement true to the ambitious vision of its founder and her spirit of creative risk-taking, the mission of the isabella stewart gardner museum is: - to bring to life and preserve the rich historic collection; - to…

Arts & Culture
11
Denver Art Museum

The primary mission of the denver art museum is to enrich the lives of present and future generations through the acquisition, presentation, and preservation of works of art, supported by exemplary scholarship and public programs related…

Arts & Culture
12
The Phillips Collection

The phillips collection is the oldest museum of modern and contemporary art in the u.s. in addition to presentation of works from the permanent collection and special exhibitions, the museum maintains active educational, academic,…

Arts & Culture
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Museum of Modern Art; the most unlike its peers is Rotary Club of Hurricane Valley. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

27 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 27 of the 54 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
27/27
Grantees still filing
21/27
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MORGAN LIBRARY: $38,300 · OtherMORGAN LIBRARYMOUNTAINSIDE SCHOOL: $32,000 · OtherMOUNTAINSIDE SCHOOLIndividual grant recipient: $25,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWHRDA: $15,000 · OtherWHRDALINCOLN CENTER FOR PERFORMING ARTS: $10,500 · OtherLINCOLN CENTER FOR PERFORMING ARTSIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · Other+21 more: $29,700 · Other+21 moreASPEN ART MUSEUM: $25,000 · Arts & CultureASPEN ART MUSEUMMANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC: $6,000 · Arts & CultureMANHATTAN THEATRE CLU…MUSEUM OF ARTS AND DESIGN: $3,250 · Arts & CultureMUSEUM OF ARTS AND DE…WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART: $3,000 · Arts & CultureWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AME…THE JEWISH MUSEUM: $2,800 · Arts & CultureTHE JEWISH MUSEUMSOLOMON R GUGGENHEIM FOUNDATION: $2,450 · Arts & CultureMuseum of Modern Art: $2,200 · Arts & CultureMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $1,800 · Arts & Culture+6 more: $2,520 · Arts & CultureMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $3,000 · InternationalUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $1,100 · InternationalPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $2,500 · HealthCreative Growth Art Center: $1,000 · HealthFRIENDS OF BELLPORT BAY INC: $1,500 · EnvironmentMADISON SQUARE PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $1,125 · EnvironmentBARD COLLEGE: $2,000 · EducationThe New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations: $490 · EducationHENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $1,150 · Human ServicesStep One School: $500 · Human ServicesWOODLAND PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $300 · Animals
Other$190,500Arts & Culture$49,020International$4,100Health$3,500Environment$2,625Education$2,490Human Services$1,650Animals$300

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetASPEN ART MUSEUM: $25,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC: $6,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMUSEUM OF ARTS AND DESIGN: $3,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE JEWISH MUSEUM: $2,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOLOMON R GUGGENHEIM FOUNDATION: $2,450 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMuseum of Modern Art: $2,200 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetBARD COLLEGE: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMETROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART: $1,800 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF BELLPORT BAY INC: $1,500 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetFILM FORUM INC: $1,450 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetThe Frick Collection: $1,300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHENRY STREET SETTLEMENT: $1,150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMADISON SQUARE PARK CONSERVANCY INC: $1,125 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF: $1,100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCreative Growth Art Center: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetStep One School: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe New York Public Library Astor Lenox and Tilden Foundations: $490 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSTERLING AND FRANCINE CLARK ART INSTITUTE: $400 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWOODLAND PARK ZOOLOGICAL SOCIETY: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE DRAWING CENTER INC: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKIDSQUEST CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO MUSEUM OF MODERN ART: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNEW YORK PUBLIC RADIO: $120 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ASPEN ART MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds MANHATTAN THEATRE CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds MUSEUM OF ARTS AND DESIGN ↗
  • Who funds WHITNEY MUSEUM OF AMERICAN ART ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE JEWISH MUSEUM ↗
  • Who funds PLANNED PARENTHOOD FEDERATION OF AMERICA INC ↗
  • Who funds SOLOMON R GUGGENHEIM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Museum of Modern Art ↗
  • Who funds BARD COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds METROPOLITAN MUSEUM OF ART ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF BELLPORT BAY INC ↗
  • Who funds FILM FORUM INC ↗
  • Who funds The Frick Collection ↗
  • Who funds HENRY STREET SETTLEMENT ↗
  • Who funds MADISON SQUARE PARK CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED STATES FUND FOR UNICEF ↗
  • Who funds Creative Growth Art Center ↗
  • Who funds ROTARY CLUB OF HURRICANE VALLEY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN9.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Morris Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Morris Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 54 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Morris’ filings →

    More from the funding graph