Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Morris & Eva Guttman Family Charitable Tr

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$55k
Granted FY2025still arriving
13
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0188% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

International$146kReligion$43kScience & Tech$7kEducation$6kPhilanthropy$6kHealth$5kHuman Services$2kPublic Safety & Disaster$500Other$0
02FY2025 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $25k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $30k
$2,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$190k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS$20,000
NE'EMAN FOUNDATION$10,000
Individual grant recipient$8,000
YOUNG ISRAEL OF DEERFIELD BEACH$4,000
Individual grant recipient$3,000
AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MATAN$3,000
Individual grant recipient$2,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTHERN NJ$2,000
ACHIE - AMERICAN COMMUNITIES HELPING ISRAEL$1,800
THE WILLIE AND CELIA TRUMP SYNAGOGUE$500
Individual grant recipient$360
MISC GRANTS PAID 1000$260
AMIT$210
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 78% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%NE'EMAN FOUNDATION: $10k → 16%GREAT GRAND NACHES: $1k → 11%COMMUITY SYNAGOGUE OF MONSEY: $5k → 14%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $88k → 17%ACHIE - AMERICAN COMMUNITIES HELPING ISRAEL: $2k → 11%YOUNG ISRAEL OF DEERFIELD BEACH: $4k → 13%SKOKIE KOLLEL: $500 → 14%KAPLAN JCC: $2k → 7%GREAT GRAND NACHES: $1k → 11%AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MATAN: $3k → 14%AMIT: $210 → 17%ACHI - AMERICAN COMMUNITIES HELPING ISRAEL: $500 → 11%YOUNG ISRAEL OF DEERFIELD BEACH: $2k → 13%THE WILLIE AND CELIA TRUMP SYNAGOGUE: $500 → 15%KAPLAN JCC ON THE PALISADES: $1k → 7%GREAT GRAND NACHES: $360 → 11%COMMUITY SYNAGOGUE OF MONSEY: $3k → 14%AMIT: $200 → 17%YOUNG ISRAEL OF DEERFIELD BEACH: $750 → 13%CONG AHAVATH TORAH: $8k → 7%HATZOLAH EMS INC: $500 → 14%AMERICAN TECHNION SOCIETY: $4k → 17%YOUNG ISRAEL OF DEERFIELD BEACH: $500 → 13%CONG AHAVAT TORAH: $7k → 7%HATZOLAH EMS OF ROCKLAND: $500 → 14%AMERICAN TECHNION SOCIETY: $4k → 17%SISHOOD YOUNG ISRAEL DEERFIELD: $150 → 13%CONGREGATION AHAVAT TORAH: $5k → 7%UJA FEDERATION OF NY: $2k → 17%MORIAH YESHIVA: $4k → 7%CONGREGATION KEHILATH JESHURUN: $5k → 17%MORIAH SCHOOL: $3k → 7%CONGREGATION KEHILAT JESHRUM: $4k → 17%KESHER COMMUNITY SYNAGOGUE: $3k → 7%MORIAH YESHIVA: $3k → 7%CONGREGATION KEHILAT JESHRUM: $2k → 17%KESHET: $500 → 7%PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS: $26k → 17%CONG AHAVAT TORAH: $400 → 7%PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS: $20k → 17%MISC GRANTS PAID 1000: $260 → 7%PROJECT EZRAH: $160 → 7%JEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTHERN NJ: $2k → 7%JEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTHERN NJ: $2k → 7%YESHIVAT FRISCH: $1k → 7%YESHIVAT NOAM: $1k → 7%YAVNEH ACADEMY: $1k → 7%HACKENSACK UMC FOUNDATION: $1k → 7%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 53% of The Morris & Eva Guttman Family Charitable Tr’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Morris & Eva Guttman Family Charitable Trlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 26% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

21%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$37k · 7 repeat orgs$141k to everyone else

7 repeat relationships: 3 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 8 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

7
21

Total granted

$37k
$112k

Still filing today

0%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 14% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $29k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’23’24’25
InternationalPhilanthropyEducationPublic Safety & DisasterOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • CS
    COMMUNITY SYNAGOGUE OF MONSEY
    2× · 2017–2018 · $8k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2017–2018 · $7k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    2× · 2017–2018 · $7k

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM
    one grant, 2024 · $88k · revenue 0%
  • CA
    CONGREGATION AHAVAT TORAH
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • CK
    CONGREGATION KEHILATH JESHURUN
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sherit Isroel
—
2
American Friends of Oseh Chayil

To further jewish education in israel

Religion
3
Zichron Avrohom Yosef
Philanthropy
4
American Friends of Torah and Tefilah Ramat Eshkol Inc

To promote and support jewish religious charitable and educational activities in israel & usa.

Religion
5
American Friends of Neveh Zion

To voluntarily assist the house of religious learning known as yeshiva neveh zion in israel

Religion
6
Friends of Yeshiva Beer Abraham

Furtherance of jewish education

Religion
7
American Friends of Yeshiva High School of Kiryat Arba Inc

Raise funds for religious and educational institutions in the state of israel, and to provide educational and social improvement for the children of kiryat arba, israel.

Philanthropy
8
American Friends of Menuchas Asher Csenger Inc

To promote, benefit, and support jewish educational activities in israel

Religion
9
American Friends of Mosdos Montreal Inc

To promote and enhance jewish religious observance in canada

Religion
10
Yeshivas Nachlas Sofrim Inc

To cultivate students' intellectual, moral and creative capacities to the fullest by transmitting the necessary skills and methods that enable students to master all areas of torah scholarship.

Religion
11
American Friends of Ish El Rayahu

To promote, benefit, and support Jewish religious, charitable & educational activities in Israel and the USA.

Religion
12
The Shalem Foundation

To promote and foster the creation of a zionist intellectual infrastructure for the state of israel, the development of a jewish national culture, and the establishment and promotion of intellectual and economic liberty.

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Northern New Jersey Inc; the most unlike its peers is Project Ezrah Needs Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 39 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $87,500 · InternationalAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOMNE EMAN FOUNDATION USA: $10,000 · InternationalNE EMAN FOUNDATION USAAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $7,200 · InternationalAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF …+1 more: $125 · InternationalIndividual grant recipient: $8,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCOMMUNITY SYNAGOGUE OF MONSEY: $7,500 · OtherCOMMUNITY SYNAGOGUE OF MONSEYIndividual grant recipient: $7,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient: $7,160 · OtherIndividual grant recipientNATIONAL COUNCIL OF YOUNG ISRAEL: $6,750 · OtherNATIONAL COUNCIL OF YOUNG ISRAELIndividual grant recipient: $5,400 · OtherIndividual grant recipientCONGREGATION AHAVAT TORAH: $5,050 · OtherCONGREGATION AHAVAT TORAHCONGREGATION KEHILATH JESHURUN: $4,600 · OtherCONGREGATION KEHILATH JESHURUNIndividual grant recipient: $3,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $2,560 · Other+17 more: $13,610 · Other+17 morePEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $46,000 · PhilanthropyPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS…JEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC: $4,200 · PhilanthropyJEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTH…AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MATAN INC: $3,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MATAN …+2 more: $1,960 · PhilanthropyMORIAH SCHOOL OF ENGLEWOOD: $3,000 · EducationYESHIVAT NOAM: $1,000 · EducationHATZOLOH EMS INC: $500 · Public Safety & Disaster
International$104,825Other$71,030Philanthropy$55,160Education$4,000Public Safety & Disaster$500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $87,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC: $46,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC: $7,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC: $4,200 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMORIAH SCHOOL OF ENGLEWOOD: $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC: $1,800 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetYESHIVAT NOAM: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHATZOLOH EMS INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetProject Ezrah Needs Inc: $160 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMIT CHILDREN INC: $125 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds PEF ISRAEL ENDOWMENT FUNDS INC ↗
  • Who funds NE EMAN FOUNDATION USA ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR TECHNION ISRAEL INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY INC ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH FEDERATION OF NORTHERN NEW JERSEY INC ↗
  • Who funds MORIAH SCHOOL OF ENGLEWOOD ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MATAN INC ↗
  • Who funds UNITED JEWISH APPEAL-FEDERATION OF JEWISH PHILANTHROPIES OF NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds YESHIVAT NOAM ↗
  • Who funds HATZOLOH EMS INC ↗
  • Who funds Project Ezrah Needs Inc ↗
  • Who funds AMIT CHILDREN INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundNY22.5× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · The Arthur & Joyce Fein Family Foundation · Cross River Community Foundation · Fjc · H&H Charitable Foundation · M D Katz Foundation Inc · The Blumenfeld Family Foundation · David & Esther Muschel Foundation · George and Ellen Friedman Family Foundation · Jewish Federation of Northern New Jersey Inc · The Ojc Fund · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Morris & Eva Guttman Family Charitable Tr funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Morris & Eva Guttman Family Charitable Tr. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Morris & Eva Guttman Family Charitable Tr?

    Find your warmest path to The Morris & Eva Guttman Family Charitable Tr through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 39 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Morris & Eva Guttman Family Charitable Tr’s filings →

    More from the funding graph