Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Moring Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$21k
Granted FY2025still arriving
12
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$5k
Largest
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Human Services$61kRecreation & Sports$15kReligion$13kInternational$11kEducation$9kEnvironment$6kArts & Culture$4kHealth$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$1,200
Median grant
5
States reached
$404k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SALVATION ARMY$5,200
YOUNG LIFE NEW ORLEANS WESTBANK$3,200
ST CATHERINE OF SIENA$2,500
NEW ORLEANS HISPANIC HERITAGE FOUNDATION$2,500
IRIS GLOBAL$2,000
MUNHOLLAND METHODIST CHURCH$1,200
OCALA CIVIC THEATRE$1,000
CROSSROADS NOLA$1,000
FRIO HOSPITAL FOUNDATION$1,000
CEDAR PARK MIDDLE SCHOOL$500
HOGS FOR THE CAUSE$500
FRIENDS OF PANTHERTOWN$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–22, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 23%, against an area that typically sits at 15%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 15%KINGSLEY HOUSE: $500 → 23%KINGSLEY HOUSE: $500 → 23%COVENANT HOUSE: $500 → 23%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$120k · 19 repeat orgs$16k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +49% since the first grant, against -11% for those funded once.

19 repeat relationships: 10 still active in FY2025, 9 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

19
9

Total granted

$120k
$15k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
-11%

Still filing today

47%
56%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 93% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesArts & CultureInternationalHousing & ShelterPublic BenefitCommunity ImprovementOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    IRIS GLOBAL
    5× · 2020–2025 · $11k · revenue +49%
  • C
    CROSSROADS
    5× · 2020–2025 · $6k · revenue +244%
  • OC
    OCALA CIVIC THEATRE INC
    2× · 2023–2025 · $2k · revenue +44%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2022 · $10k
  • BG
    Boys & Girls Club of The Plateau Inc
    one grant, 2021 · $1k · revenue +20%
  • US
    USA SPORTING CLAYS TEAM
    one grant, 2021 · $750
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Heart of Louisiana Humane Society
Animals
2
Louisiana Organization for Refugees and Immigrants
International
3
Laura Center for Creole Heritage
Arts & Culture
4
Eden Garden Orphanage

Eden Garden Orphanage cares for orphans in and from the country of Haiti, preventing the otherwise likely outcome of an early death due to malnutrition or disease and /or a life of prostitution or crime.

—
5
Covenant House Georgia Inc

Covenant house georgia provides shelters, protects and advocates on behalf of homeless, trafficked, runaway and sexually exploited youth.

—
6
House of Tulip

Building an inheritance by creating housing solutions for the trans and gender nonconforming TGNC community in Louisiana. The organization endeavors to acquire a separate space to serve as a community ce

Housing & Shelter
7
Orleans County Child Advocacy Center Inc
Health
8
Louisiana Alpha House Scholarship Foundation
Philanthropy
9
Heroes of New Orleans

Heroes of New Orleans is a grassroot 501(c)(3) nonprofit organization committed to inspiring and empowering youth and families. Our mission is to elevate underprivileged youth and families who face poverty or its risks, through a…

Youth Development
10
Turning Tables

Turning tables was built by industry mentors and introduced to new orleans with its first graduating class of externs in 2019. what we found that year was a thirst for community within the hospitality industry among black and brown…

Employment
11
Daughters Beyond Incarceration

DBI vision is for every daughter with an incarcerated parent to live a healthy stable life and have a strong, positive, relationship with her parent during and after incarceration.

Youth Development
12
New Orleans Family Justice Alliance

The organization is a partnership of agencies dedicated to ending family violence, child abuse, sexual assault, and stalking through prevention and coordinated response by providing comprehensive client-centered, empowerment services in a…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Hogs for the Cause Inc; the most unlike its peers is Krewe de Pink Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

15 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 15 of the 31 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
15/15
Grantees still filing
11/15
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SALVATION ARMY: $39,450 · OtherSALVATION ARMYYOUNG LIFE NEW ORLEANS WESTBANK: $14,700 · OtherYOUNG LIFE NEW ORLEANS WESTBANKOPERATION BLESSING INC: $11,500 · OtherOPERATION BLESSING INCIndividual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTRINITY EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $6,000 · OtherTRINITY EPISCOPAL CHURCHST CATHERINE OF SIENA: $4,000 · OtherVILLAGE GREEN: $4,000 · Other+15 more: $14,650 · Other+15 moreIRIS GLOBAL: $10,500 · InternationalNEW ORLEANS HISPANIC HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 · Arts & CultureOCALA CIVIC THEATRE INC: $2,000 · Arts & CultureCROSSROADS: $6,000 · Housing & ShelterSOUND OFF: $2,000 · Public BenefitFRIENDS OF PANTHERTOWN INC: $2,000 · Community ImprovementCLOVER NOLA INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesEDEN CENTERS: $500 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE NEW ORLEANS: $500 · Human Services
Other$104,300International$10,500Arts & Culture$9,500Housing & Shelter$6,000Public Benefit$2,000Community Improvement$2,000Human Services$2,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetIRIS GLOBAL: $10,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ORLEANS HISPANIC HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC: $7,500 over 3y, 1.2% of budgetCROSSROADS: $6,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetOCALA CIVIC THEATRE INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSOUND OFF: $2,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF PANTHERTOWN INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetHOGS FOR THE CAUSE INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBoys & Girls Club of The Plateau Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCLOVER NOLA INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNEW ORLEANS MISSION INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetEDEN CENTERS: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE NEW ORLEANS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN ANIMAL FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetKrewe de Pink Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS GULF SOUTH INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds IRIS GLOBAL ↗
  • Who funds NEW ORLEANS HISPANIC HERITAGE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds CROSSROADS ↗
  • Who funds OCALA CIVIC THEATRE INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUND OFF ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF PANTHERTOWN INC ↗
  • Who funds HOGS FOR THE CAUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds Boys & Girls Club of The Plateau Inc ↗
  • Who funds CLOVER NOLA INC ↗
  • Who funds NEW ORLEANS MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds EDEN CENTERS ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT HOUSE NEW ORLEANS ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHERN ANIMAL FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Krewe de Pink Inc ↗
  • Who funds COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS GULF SOUTH INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Greater New Orleans FoundationLA23.4× affinity9 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Greater New Orleans Foundation · Baptist Community Ministries · Shell USA Company Foundation · Methodist Health System Foundation Inc · The Aaron or Peggy Selber Foundation In · Gustaf Westfeldt McIlhenny Family Founda · The Usdin-Weil Foundation · United Way of Southeast Louisiana · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · National Philanthropic Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Moring Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Moring Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Moring Charitable Trust?

    Find your warmest path to The Moring Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 31 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Moring’s filings →

    More from the funding graph