Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Morf Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$3.7M
Granted FY2024still arriving
13
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$1.0M
Largest
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$8.7MHealth$4.8MCivil Rights$2.5MHuman Services$2.4MCrime & Legal$2.0MHousing & Shelter$1.3MEducation$1.0MInternational$650kOther$0
02FY2024 · 13 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • $10k–50k1 grant · $40k
  • $50k–250k7 grants · $650k
  • $250k+5 grants · $3.0M
$150,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$7.0M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW YORK UNIVERSITY$1,000,000
MOTION PICTURE & TELEVISION FUND$1,000,000
THE FILM FOUNDATION$500,000
CHILDREN'S HOSPITAL OF LOS ANGELES$250,000
FRIENDS OF THE BRITISH FILM INSTITUTE$250,000
UCLFAA INC$150,000
LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION$150,000
AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE$100,000
DIRECTORS GUILD FOUNDATION$100,000
LA FAMILY HOUSING$50,000
MY FRIEND'S PLACE$50,000
THE AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ROYAL FOUNDATION$50,000
SCHOOL FOR ETHICS AND GLOBAL LEADERSHIP$40,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $1.0M) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MOTION PICTURE & TELEVISION FUND: $1.0M → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

87%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$28M · 14 repeat orgs$4.4M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +28% since the first grant, against +2% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 9 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
5

Total granted

$28M
$2.3M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+28%
+2%

Still filing today

64%
60%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 42% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2.1M went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Arts & CulturePhilanthropyHuman ServicesEducationHealthInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TF
    THE FILM FOUNDATION INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $3.8M · revenue +4% · 36% of their budget
  • CH
    Children's Hospital Los Angeles
    8× · 2017–2024 · $2.9M · revenue +78%
  • LF
    LA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION
    8× · 2017–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +293%

Funded once

  • EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC
    one grant, 2019 · $1.0M · revenue +10%
  • EF
    EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT
    one grant, 2017 · $1.0M
  • EA
    EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $100k · revenue -55%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The British Academy of Film and Television Arts North America Inc

The specific purposes for which bafta na is organized is to promote, maintain, improve and advance original and creative work among individuals employed professionally in film and television production and allied industries, to create and…

Arts & Culture
2
Academy of Television Arts and Sciences

The Television Academy is dedicated to celebrating excellence, innovation and the advancement of the telecommunications arts and sciences through recognition, education and leadership, while fostering a diverse, inclusive and accessible…

—
3
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
4
Siff

Siff is a seattle-based 501(c)(3) arts nonprofit dedicated to the creation of vibrant experiences and spaces that champion film discovery and arts education.

Youth Development
5
Screen Actors Guild-American Federation of Television and Radio Artists

Sag-aftra members work together to secure the strongest protections for media artists.

Employment
6
Academy of Television Arts and Sciences Foundation

The charitable arm of the tv academy, the academy of television arts & sciences foundation, is dedicated to preserving television while educating and inspiring future leaders.

Arts & Culture
7
Moving Picture Institute

The moving picture institute is a nonprofit production company and talent incubator that creates high-impact films designed to entertain, inspire, and educate audiences with captivating stories about human freedom.

Arts & Culture
8
Hollywood Foreign Press Association Charitable Trust
Philanthropy
9
American Foreign Service Association

American foreign service association (afsa) is both the principal advocate for the long-term institutional wellbeing of the professional career foreign service and responsible for safeguarding the interest of afsa members. (continued on…

—
10
California Film Institute

The california film institute celebrates film and videos as art and education. its goal is to present and support emerging and established independent filmakers whose works address issues relevant to contemporary society. this is…

Arts & Culture
11
The Actors' Fund of America

The entertainment community fund is a national human services organization that fosters stability and resiliency and provides a safety net for performing arts and entertainment professionals over their lifespan. (continued in schedule o).

Membership Benefit
12
Academy of Motion Picture Arts and Sciences

To recognize and uphold excellence in the motion picture arts and sciences, inspire imagination, and connect the world through the medium of motion pictures.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Motion Picture and Television Fund; the most unlike its peers is New York University. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 23 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

4
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
9/16
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MPTF: $9,020,000 · OtherMPTFACLU FOUNDATION: $2,500,000 · OtherACLU FOUNDATIONUCLFAA: $1,900,000 · OtherUCLFAAMY FRIEND'S PLACE: $1,300,000 · OtherMY FRIEND'S PLACELA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION: $1,300,000 · OtherLA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATIONBFI AMERICA: $1,250,000 · OtherBFI AMERICAEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT: $1,000,000 · OtherDIRECTORS GUILD FOUNDATION: $725,000 · Other+2 more: $275,000 · OtherTHE FILM FOUNDATION INC: $3,750,000 · Arts & CultureTHE FILM FOUNDAT…LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $898,719 · Arts & CultureLOS ANGELES PHIL…+2 more: $200,000 · Arts & CultureChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $2,900,000 · HealthChildren's…PABLOVE FOUNDATION INC: $1,950,000 · PhilanthropyAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ROYAL FOUNDATION OF THE PRINCE AND PRINCESS OF WALES: $100,000 · PhilanthropyMOTION PICTURE AND TELEVISION FUND: $1,000,000 · Human ServicesEMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 · Human ServicesNew York University: $1,000,000 · EducationThe School for Ethics and Global Leadership: $40,000 · EducationEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC: $1,000,000 · Crime & LegalHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $425,000 · International
Other$19,270,000Arts & Culture$4,848,719Health$2,900,000Philanthropy$2,050,000Human Services$1,100,000Education$1,040,000Crime & Legal$1,000,000International$425,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE FILM FOUNDATION INC: $3,750,000 over 8y, 36% of budgetChildren's Hospital Los Angeles: $2,900,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetPABLOVE FOUNDATION INC: $1,950,000 over 5y, 30% of budgetLA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION: $1,300,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetBFI AMERICA: $1,250,000 over 5y, 56% of budgetEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC: $1,000,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetMOTION PICTURE AND TELEVISION FUND: $1,000,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetNew York University: $1,000,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION: $898,719 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetDIRECTORS GUILD FOUNDATION: $725,000 over 8y, 30% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC: $425,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetTHE AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE: $100,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetEMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ROYAL FOUNDATION OF THE PRINCE AND PRINCESS OF WALES: $100,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetMICHIGAN THEATER FOUNDATION INC: $100,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetThe School for Ethics and Global Leadership: $40,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE FILM FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Children's Hospital Los Angeles ↗
  • Who funds PABLOVE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds LA FAMILY HOUSING CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds BFI AMERICA ↗
  • Who funds EVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds MOTION PICTURE AND TELEVISION FUND ↗
  • Who funds New York University ↗
  • Who funds LOS ANGELES PHILHARMONIC ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds DIRECTORS GUILD FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN FILM INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds EMERGENCY ASSISTANCE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF THE ROYAL FOUNDATION OF THE PRINCE AND PRINCESS OF WALES ↗
  • Who funds MICHIGAN THEATER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The School for Ethics and Global Leadership ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

National Philanthropic TrustPA10.1× affinity5 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Morf Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Morf Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 23 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Morf’s filings →

    More from the funding graph