· Private foundation
The Montei Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2020–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k8 grants · $36k
- $10k–50k40 grants · $931k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $270k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| VISTA VILLAGE INC | $100,000 |
| KAKENYA CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE | $60,000 |
| FORTY CARROTS FAMILY CENTER | $60,000 |
| HABITAT FOR HUMANITY MID OHIO | $50,000 |
| LOWER LIGHTS MINISTRIES | $45,000 |
| HOME FOR FAMILIES | $41,000 |
| FEED THE KIDS COLUMBUS | $40,000 |
| FLYING HORSE FARMS | $40,000 |
| MARY'S MEALS USA | $40,000 |
| WE CARE SOLAR | $35,000 |
| FAMILIES FLOURISH | $35,000 |
| GIFT OF ADOPTION FUND | $35,000 |
| MAKE A WISH FOUNDATION OF OHIO | $30,000 |
| MCCURDY MINISTRIES | $30,000 |
| EMBRACE GLOBAL | $30,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY20–25, $719k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 90% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +44% since the first grant, against -42% for the ones you funded once.
56 repeat relationships — 41 still active in FY2025, 15 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $125k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- HFHABITAT FOR HUMANITY - MIDOHIO4× · 2020–2025 · $300k · revenue +97%
- KCKAKENYA CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE4× · 2020–2025 · $235k · revenue +300%
- FCForty Carrots of Sarasota Inc4× · 2020–2025 · $210k · revenue +127%
Funded once
- VPVarious Public Charitiesone grant, 2022 · $1.1M
- VPVarious Public Charities - See Scheone grant, 2023 · $1.1M
- CCCATHOLIC CHARITIES OF THE DIOCSES OF ALLENTOWNone grant, 2021 · $40k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
A family for every child in our lifetime.
Caring for kids, inc. (cfk) is a private, non-profit, full-service adoption and foster care agency operating since 1995. cfk specializes in diverse and inclusive birth parent, foster care, adoption and behavioral health services. our…
Together, we create life-changing wishes for children with critical illnesses.
Wishing star foundation's mission is to provide hope and lasting memories for children who are terminal or battling a life-threatening illness.
Miracle flights is a national charity that provides free commercial airline tickets for u.s. residents in need of distant medical care not available in their own communities.
Children's flight of hope (cfoh) provides flights to essential, life-changing, and life-saving medical care for children in need. together with our donors, partners, and champions, we help ease the emotional and financial burden on…
To help kids and families heal the emotional scars of childhood cancer and learn to thrive.
Accelerating the most effective gene therapy treatments for children with ultra-rare diseases.
None
Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…
Together, we create life-changing wishes for children with critical illnesses.
Zoe Empowers is a global network of local organizations throughout Africa and India providing a replicable and scalable framework whereby youth led or resourced families are provided the training, resources, and community support to become…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Make-a-Wish Foundation of Oh Ky & in and the most unlike its peers is Tom Fennessymike Harden Back to School Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 23 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 6% of your grantees by number, and just 6% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
52 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 52 of the 80 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds HABITAT FOR HUMANITY - MIDOHIO ↗
- Who funds KAKENYA CENTER FOR EXCELLENCE ↗
- Who funds Forty Carrots of Sarasota Inc ↗
- Who funds VISTA VILLAGE INC ↗
- Who funds FLYING HORSE FARMS ↗
- Who funds Mary's Meals USA Inc ↗
- Who funds WE CARE SOLAR ↗
- Who funds LOWER LIGHT MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds GIFT OF ADOPTION FUND INC ↗
- Who funds ONE SIMPLE WISH INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG WOMEN'S CHRISTIAN ASSOCIATION ↗
- Who funds A SENSE OF HOME ↗
- Who funds DIRECTIONS FOR YOUTH AND FAMILIES INC ↗
- Who funds THE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK ↗
- Who funds LIFECARE ALLIANCE ↗
- Who funds THE HOMELESS FAMILIES FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds FEED THE KIDS COLUMBUS INC ↗
- Who funds PILOT DOGS ALLOWAY ↗
- Who funds NELLIES CHAMPIONS FOR KIDS INC ↗
- Who funds THE BUCKEYE RANCH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds FAMILIES FLOURISH INC ↗
- Who funds MOTE MARINE LABORATORY INC ↗
- Who funds CLEAN THE WORLD FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PATCHES OF LIGHT ↗
- Who funds MISTY MEADOWS MITEY RIDERS INC ↗
- Who funds MAKE-A-WISH FOUNDATION OF OH KY & IN ↗
- Who funds OHIO WILDLIFE CENTER ↗
- Who funds OHIO STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SECORE INTERNATIONAL INC ↗
- Who funds FREE TO SMILE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds JORDAN RIESER LEGACY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OPERATIONS WARRIOR FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Mercy Medical Angels ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Columbus Foundation · Harry C Moores Foundation · Columbus Jewish Foundation · The William H Davis Dorothy M Davis and William C Davis Foundation · L Brands Foundation · United Way of Central Ohio Inc · Ingram-White Castle Foundation · American Electric Power Foundation · Nisource Charitable Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Siemer Family Foundation · Safelite Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Montei Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Mote Marine Laboratory Inc — 4% of income from government
- Clean the World Foundation Inc — 0% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Montei Foundation?
Find your warmest path to The Montei Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.