Skip to content
The Monford D and Lucy L Custer Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Monford D and Lucy L Custer Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$110k
Granted FY2025still arriving
9
Grants FY2025still arriving
5
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0196% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Health$187kHuman Services$133kArts & Culture$109kPhilanthropy$83kYouth Development$69kHousing & Shelter$65kEducation$48kFood & Nutrition$40kOther$0
02FY2025 · 9 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$10,000
Median grant
5
States reached
$1.8M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE GOOD SHEPHERD CENTER$25,000
PIN MINISTRY$12,500
SINCLAIR HEALTH CLINIC$12,500
MATTHEW REARDON CENTER FOR AUTISM$10,000
ARTS SOUTHEAST$10,000
LOOP IT UP SAVANNAH$10,000
ADULT CARE CENTER OF THE NSV$10,000
TAMRA LEARNING ACADEMY$10,000
SAFE SHELTER$10,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $38k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 67% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%AMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACTION PLANNING TEAM ADAPT: $4k → 22%PIN MINISTRY: $13k → 10%ROCKBRIDGE AREA HOSPICE: $21k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

63%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$488k · 12 repeat orgs$289k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +21% since the first grant, against -32% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
17

Total granted

$488k
$199k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+21%
-32%

Still filing today

83%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 18% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $90k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthEducationFood & NutritionYouth DevelopmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TL
    THE LAUREL CENTER INTERVENTION FOR DOMESTIC & SEXUAL VIOLENCE
    4× · 2017–2022 · $70k · revenue +47%
  • BO
    BARNS OF ROSE HILL
    5× · 2017–2021 · $50k · revenue +36%
  • TM
    THE MATTHEW REARDON CENTER FOR AUTISM INC
    3× · 2021–2025 · $35k · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • WE
    WINCHESTER EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue -47%
  • RA
    ROCKBRIDGE AREA HOSPICE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $21k · revenue +42%
  • AP
    A PLACE TO BE
    one grant, 2023 · $20k · revenue -32%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Hope House Day Care Center Inc

The purpose of the organization is to provide supportive social services to children and individuals affected by hiv and poverty in order to enhance the quality of their lives. the mission is to improve the quality of life for individuals…

Human Services
2
Hope Harbor Home Inc

Hope Harbor Home strives to break the cycle of domestic and sexual violence in Brunswick County, North Carolina.

—
3
Sheffield Care Center Inc

At the sheffield care center our mission, through dedicated teamwork, is to provide all who enter our doors with a clean, comfortable, home-like atmosphere where honesty, dignity, respect and genuine compassion for one another prevails.

Human Services
4
The Child Care and Learning Center

The establishment and operation of a child learning/daycare facility for the use, benefit, and general welfare of the children of rappahannock county, virginia.

Education
5
Virginia B Andes Volunteer Community Clinic Inc

Provide no-cost volunteer medical, pharmacy and wellness services to the under-served in charlotte county

Health
6
Peninsula Institute for Community Health

Providing medical and dental care to indigent patients.

Health
7
Sunset Community Health Center

To deliver comprehensive and preventive primary care in a culturally sensitive, compassionate and professional manner, ultimately improving the health of our patients and responding to the health and education needs of our communities.

Health
8
Bridgehampton Child Care and Recreational Center Inc

It is the purpose of the Center to deliver the highest quality childcare, youth and adult development services to lower income families and the growing immigrant population in Bridgehampton and surrounding communities through educational…

Human Services
9
Loudoun Community Health Center Healthworks for Northern Virginia

To provide excellent and affordable medical, dental, and behavioral healthcare to those who have limited or no health insurance by being compassionate, culturally competent and accessible to all.

Health
10
New Leaf Behavioral Health

New leaf behavioral health believes quality mental health care should be accessible to all in need in our community. we strive to make this vision a reality by providing innovative access to cutting edge outpatient clinical services.

Health
11
Margaret B Shipley Child Health Clinic Inc

The margaret b. shipley child health clinic is a nonprofit, safety-net community pediatric clinic offering best-in-class healthcare to children with the aim to improve health equity for all.

Health
12
Stevens Center

Providing personalized support for individuals with developmental disabalities to live fulfilling lives in a welcoming community.

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Rockbridge Area Hospice Inc; the most unlike its peers is Hope House Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

24 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 24 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
24/24
Grantees still filing
10/24
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNITED WAY OF ROANOKE: $70,000 · OtherUNITED WAY OF ROANOKEBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CAMARILLO: $59,000 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CAMARILLOIndividual grant recipient: $21,600 · OtherIndividual grant recipientA PLACE TO BE: $20,000 · OtherA PLACE TO BEMARBRIDGE HOME: $17,000 · OtherMARBRIDGE HOMEVIRGINIA BEACH SAMARITAN HOUSE: $15,000 · OtherVIRGINIA BEACH SAMARITAN HOUSECORY JOSEPH WILSON MEMORIAL FOUNDATION INC: $13,000 · OtherHOOFS 4 HEALING EQUESTRIAN SERVICES INC: $13,000 · OtherADULT CARE CENTER OF THE NSV: $10,000 · OtherTAMRA LEARNING ACADEMY: $10,000 · OtherSAFE SHELTER: $10,000 · Other+4 more: $20,265 · Other+4 moreTHE LAUREL CENTER INTERVENTION FOR DOMESTIC & SEXUAL VIOLENCE: $70,400 · Human ServicesTHE LAUREL CENTER…ROCKBRIDGE AREA HOSPICE INC: $21,000 · Human ServicesROCKBRIDGE AREA H…PIN MINISTRY: $12,500 · Human ServicesPIN MINISTRYSTEP UP VENTURA: $10,000 · Human ServicesSTEP UP VENTURAAMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACTION PLANNING TEAM: $4,000 · Human ServicesBARNS OF ROSE HILL: $50,000 · Arts & CultureBARNS OF ROSE H…ARTS SOUTHEAST INC: $20,575 · Arts & CultureARTS SOUTHEAST …TEMPLE CHILDRENS MUSEUM: $14,590 · Arts & CultureTEMPLE CHILDREN…CHANNEL ISLANDS MARITIME MUSEUM INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureCHANNEL ISLANDS…LOOP IT UP SAVANNAH INC: $10,000 · Arts & CultureLOOP IT UP SAVA…SHENANDOAH VALLEY DISCOVERY MUSEUM INC: $4,000 · Arts & CultureNEW HOPE CLINIC INC: $52,000 · HealthNEW HOPE CLINIC…LEARY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $32,000 · HealthLEARY EDUCATION…DR TERRY SINCLAIR HEALTH CLINIC INC: $12,500 · HealthDR TERRY SINCLA…HOPE HOUSE INC: $12,000 · HealthHOPE HOUSE INCTHE MATTHEW REARDON CENTER FOR AUTISM INC: $35,000 · EducationTHE MATTHEW …WINCHESTER EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 · EducationWINCHESTER E…FREMONT STREET NURSERY: $23,000 · EducationFREMONT STRE…AMERICA'S SECOND HARVEST OF COASTAL GEORGIA INC: $40,000 · Food & NutritionGood Shepherd Ministries of Wilmington Inc: $25,000 · Housing & ShelterBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SANTA CLARA VALLEY: $10,000 · Youth Development
Other$278,865Human Services$117,900Arts & Culture$109,165Health$108,500Education$88,000Food & Nutrition$40,000Housing & Shelter$25,000Youth Development$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE LAUREL CENTER INTERVENTION FOR DOMESTIC & SEXUAL VIOLENCE: $70,400 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF CAMARILLO: $59,000 over 3y, 1.6% of budgetNEW HOPE CLINIC INC: $52,000 over 2y, 5.4% of budgetBARNS OF ROSE HILL: $50,000 over 5y, 1.9% of budgetAMERICA'S SECOND HARVEST OF COASTAL GEORGIA INC: $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MATTHEW REARDON CENTER FOR AUTISM INC: $35,000 over 3y, 0.8% of budgetLEARY EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION INC: $32,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetWINCHESTER EDUCATION FOUNDATION INC: $30,000 over 1y, 4.7% of budgetGood Shepherd Ministries of Wilmington Inc: $25,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetFREMONT STREET NURSERY: $23,000 over 2y, 2.5% of budgetROCKBRIDGE AREA HOSPICE INC: $21,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetARTS SOUTHEAST INC: $20,575 over 2y, 3.3% of budgetA PLACE TO BE: $20,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetTEMPLE CHILDRENS MUSEUM: $14,590 over 2y, 2.2% of budgetDR TERRY SINCLAIR HEALTH CLINIC INC: $12,500 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetPIN MINISTRY: $12,500 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF SANTA CLARA VALLEY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetCHANNEL ISLANDS MARITIME MUSEUM INC: $10,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetLOOP IT UP SAVANNAH INC: $10,000 over 1y, 3.4% of budgetAMERICANS WITH DISABILITIES ACTION PLANNING TEAM: $4,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetSHENANDOAH VALLEY DISCOVERY MUSEUM INC: $4,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of Clarke Co…American Woodmark Fou…The Community Foundat…United Way of Norther…The Clara Weiss FundThe Community Foundat…Ridgeway Em-CharittuwJohn L Harrell & Marg…Andrew U Ferrari Foun…Borden FoundationThe Blackbaud Giving …Charities Aid Foundat…
The Bank of Clarke County FoundationVA21.9× affinity8 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of Clarke County Foundation · American Woodmark Foundation Inc · The Community Foundation of the Northern Shenandoah Valley · United Way of Northern Shenandoah Valley Inc · The Clara Weiss Fund · The Community Foundation of Harrisonburg & Rockingham County · Ridgeway Em-Charittuw · John L Harrell & Margaret T Harrell Charitable Trust C/O First Bank Trustee · Andrew U Ferrari Foundation · Borden Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Monford D and Lucy L Custer Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Monford D and Lucy L Custer Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%6%25%56%100%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    13report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Monford D and Lucy L Custer’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home