· Private foundation
The Moe-Life Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2018–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k3 grants · $14k
- $10k–50k4 grants · $50k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| TO WRITE LOVE ON HER ARMS | $15,000 |
| END VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN INT'L | $15,000 |
| COLEL CHABAD | $10,000 |
| FOR THE CHILD | $10,000 |
| HEROIC HEARTS PROJECT | $6,000 |
| HUMANSAVE | $5,000 |
| SHADOW HILLS RIDING CLUB | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY21–25, $52k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 81% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
7 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 4 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $24k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FTFOR THE CHILD INC5× · 2021–2025 · $48k · revenue +14%
- AWA WALK ON WATER INC2× · 2018–2019 · $42k · revenue +4%
- MLMY LIFE FOUNDATION INC2× · 2022–2023 · $25k · revenue +73%
Funded once
- TBThe Blind Childrens Center Incgraduatedone grant, 2019 · $16k · revenue +105%
- ISINTERNATIONAL SANCTUARYone grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue -31%
- FLFOSTER LOVE FKA TOGETHER WE RISEone grant, 2022 · $10k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
We create online tools to help survivors of sexual harm, domestic violence, and child abuse find healing. it is our aim to help survivors safely and anonymously disclose and understand their experiences, connect with community, and find…
W.O.M.A.N., Inc. supports survivors of domestic violence and their loved ones along their healing journeys, bridging value rich networks designed to address intersections of violence. In all our work, we strive to continually increase our…
She Is Safe prevents, rescues and restores women and girls from abuse and exploitation in high risk communities across the globe, equipping them to build lives of freedom and faith for a strong future. We accomplish our work in partnership…
Shalva offers deep jewish cultural competency and expertise in domestic abuse to support our diverse community.-shalva empowers those experiencing and healing from domestic abuse by offering confidential counseling or referral and needed…
The organization empowers feminist jewish women leaders and philanthropists to advance equity andsocial justice. the organization focuses on the following: supporting jewish women nonprofit leaders and their organizations by providing…
To proclaim the gospel, grow the messianic jewish community and engage the church concerning israel and the jewish people. this is done through education, evangelism and being a movement leader, all with excellence in order to transform…
Avodah develops lifelong social justice leaders whose work is informed by jewish values and who inspire the jewish community to work toward a more just and equitable world.
The jewish women's archive documents jewish women's stories, elevates their voices, and inspires them to be agents of change.jwa is dedicated to expanding and transforming the historical narrative by restoring jewish women and gender…
Womankind uses the multidimensionality of its asian heritage to work alongside survivors of gender-based violence as they build a path to healing.
Simon wiesenthal center, inc. (the center) is a global jewish human rights activist organization that confronts anti-semitism, hate, stands with israel, defends the safety of jews worldwide, and teaches the lessons of the holocaust for…
To empower survivors to heal and engage all individuals and communities to address and prevent sexual assault and intimate partner violence
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is For the Child Inc and the most unlike its peers is Shadow Hills Riding Club Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
21 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 21 of the 27 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FOR THE CHILD INC ↗
- Who funds A WALK ON WATER INC ↗
- Who funds TWLOHA INC ↗
- Who funds END VIOLENCE AGAINST WOMEN INTERNATIONAL (EVAWI) ↗
- Who funds MY LIFE FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds CREATE NOW INC ↗
- Who funds SAVE A WARRIOR INC ↗
- Who funds The Blind Childrens Center Inc ↗
- Who funds INTERNATIONAL SANCTUARY ↗
- Who funds WOMENSHELTER OF LONG BEACH ↗
- Who funds THE JEWISH COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds JEWISH CHILDRENS MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds STRONGMINDS INC ↗
- Who funds HEROIC HEARTS PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds HUMANSAVE ↗
- Who funds GEMS UNCOVERED INC ↗
- Who funds 4GIRLS ORGANIZATION INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL ALLIANCE ON MENTAL ILLNESS GREATER LOS ANGELES CTY(NAMI GLAC) ↗
- Who funds INSTITUTE FOR JEWISH SPIRITUALITY INC ↗
- Who funds SHADOW HILLS RIDING CLUB INC ↗
- Who funds HILLEL THE FOUNDATION FOR JEWISH CAMPUS LIFE ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Weingart Foundation · California Community Foundation · Bess J Hodges Foundation · The Ralph M Parsons Foundation · Jewish Communal Fund · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Endowment Foundation · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Moe-Life Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.