Skip to content
Plinth
Foundation Dossiers
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Mj & Caral G Lebworth Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$31k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What you fundRead
02The needRead
03Your edgeRead
04Your fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What you fund
0198% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2019–2025.

Education$1.7MHealth$895kArts & Culture$553kHuman Services$551kInternational$375kCrime & Legal$244kFood & Nutrition$173kYouth Development$118kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$20,237
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
JACKIE ROBINSON FOUNDATION$20,237
HUDSON RIVER MUSEUM$10,888
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–21, $151k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 83% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%VALLEY OF THE SUN YMCA: $25k → 11%NONPROFIT CENTER OF THE BERKSHIRES: $20k → 12%CITY OF ASYLUM: $5k → 11%SKY'S THE LIMIT FUND: $25k → 8%SQUASH HAVEN INC: $50k → 12%WESTCHESTER CHILDREN'S ASSOCIATION: $1k → 9%CHARITY WATER: $25k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
IL
NY
MA
OH
PA
CT
CA
CO
VA
MD
AZ
DC
AL
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

44%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.0M · 15 repeat orgs$2.6M to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +20% since the first grant, against +18% for the ones you funded once.

15 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
49

Total granted

$2.0M
$2.6M

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+20%
+18%

Still filing today

73%
76%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 65% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $11k went to new ones.

50%100%’19’20’21’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’19’20’21’24’25
Arts & CultureHuman ServicesHealthEducationInternationalYouth DevelopmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SA
    STUDENT ADVOCACY INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $75k · revenue +33%
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF PUERTO RICO INC
    3× · 2019–2021 · $63k · revenue +318%
  • CITY HARVEST INC
    2× · 2020–2021 · $55k · revenue +3%

Funded once

  • CF
    CHILD & FAMILY AGENCY OF SOUTHEASTERN CT
    one grant, 2019 · $500k
  • LF
    LAWYERS FOR CHILDREN INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $200k · revenue +35%
  • TC
    The Ciesla Foundation
    one grant, 2024 · $180k · revenue 0%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
2
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
3
University of New Haven

The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…

Education
4
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
5
Open Markets Institute

The open markets institute works to help people relearn how to use competition policy to build stronger democracies, more just and equitable societies, more innovative and sustainable economies, and a more secure and peaceful world.

Education
6
University Associates in Obstetrics and Gynecology University Faculty Pract ice Corporation

Provide clinical instruction to and supervision of medical school students, interns and residents and, incident thereto, rendering professional services.

Health
7
The Common Application Inc

The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…

Education
8
The Paris Review Foundation Inc

The mission of the organization is to foster the development of creative individuals as writers and artists and to promote public appreciation of excellence in the literary and graphic arts by publishing a magazine containing fiction,…

Education
9
Waterorg

Water.org's goal is to bring safe water and sanitation to the world through access to small, affordable loans.

International
10
Sarah Lawrence College

At sarah lawrence college, our mission is to graduate citizens of the world who are diverse in every definition of the word, who take intellectual and creative risks, and who are able to focus exceptional intellectual discipline (continued…

Education
11
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
12
Actionaid Usa

Actionaid is an international network building a just, equitable, and sustainable world in solidarity with communities on the frontlines of poverty and injustice. actionaid usa is the u.s. branch of actionaid international, which works in…

Social Science

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Center for Transformative Action and the most unlike its peers is American Museum of Natural History. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyYouth Sports ProgramsFood Banks and PantriesLocal Food System Organizat…Community FoundationsEnvironmental Conservation …Pregnancy Support ServicesPolicy Research and AdvocacyCommunity Arts CentersYouth Development CentersWomen & Girls Leadership De…Independent K-12 SchoolsChild Abuse Advocacy Servic…
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 39 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number22%0%<5yr14%2%5–10yr19%14%10–20yr16%31%20–35yr13%29%35–55yr16%25%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value22%0%<5yr14%1%5–10yr19%8%10–20yr16%30%20–35yr13%47%35–55yr16%14%55yr+

The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/57
the rest of the field
13%
240,396/1,819,508

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

52 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 52 of the 68 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
11
Early backer (in before they grew)
52/52
Grantees still filing
36/52
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

JACKIE ROBINSON FOUNDATION INC — $515,237 · OtherJACKIE ROBINSON FOUNDATION INCCHILD & FAMILY AGENCY OF SOUTHEASTERN CT — $500,000 · OtherCHILD & FAMILY AGENCY OF SOUTHEASTERN CTYALE UNIVERSITY — $410,000 · OtherYALE UNIVERSITYThe Ciesla Foundation — $180,000 · OtherThe Ciesla FoundationWEILL CORNELL MEDICINE — $100,000 · OtherJED FOUNDATION INC — $100,000 · OtherYALE UNIVERSITY — $100,000 · Other+32 more — $753,000 · Other+32 morePEER HEALTH EXCHANGE INC — $600,000 · Youth DevelopmentPEER HEALTH EX…+1 more — $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $150,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEE…COMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS — $100,000 · EducationCOMMUNITIES…STUDENT ADVOCACY INC — $75,000 · EducationSTUDENT ADV…UCLA FOUNDATION — $75,000 · EducationUCLA FOUNDA…BROOME STREET ACADEMY CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL — $50,000 · EducationBROOME STRE…The Madeira School — $50,000 · EducationThe Madeira…+1 more — $10,000 · EducationINSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION INC — $100,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $100,000 · InternationalInternational Rescue Committee INC — $75,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $70,000 · International+1 more — $10,000 · InternationalEUGENE O'NEILL MEMORIAL THEATER CENTER INC — $100,000 · Arts & CultureGarde Arts Center Inc — $90,000 · Arts & CultureTHE KENYON REVIEW — $60,000 · Arts & CulturePEN AMERICAN CENTER INC — $50,000 · Arts & Culture+4 more — $32,888 · Arts & CultureActive Minds Inc — $100,000 · HealthPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $100,000 · HealthWORLDWIDE FISTULA FUND — $25,000 · HealthANGELICA PATIENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM — $15,000 · HealthPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND INC — $15,000 · HealthLAWYERS FOR CHILDREN INC — $200,000 · Crime & LegalTRUTH BE TOLD — $14,000 · Crime & Legal
Other$2,658,237Youth Development$610,000Education$510,000International$355,000Arts & Culture$332,888Health$255,000Crime & Legal$214,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetPEER HEALTH EXCHANGE INC — $600,000 over 2y, 5.5% of budgetJACKIE ROBINSON FOUNDATION INC — $515,237 over 4y, 1.4% of budgetLAWYERS FOR CHILDREN INC — $200,000 over 1y, 2.3% of budgetThe Ciesla Foundation — $180,000 over 1y, 20% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $150,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetINSTITUTE OF INTERNATIONAL EDUCATION INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEUGENE O'NEILL MEMORIAL THEATER CENTER INC — $100,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetActive Minds Inc — $100,000 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetCOMMUNITIES IN SCHOOLS — $100,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION — $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGarde Arts Center Inc — $90,000 over 1y, 4.1% of budgetInternational Rescue Committee INC — $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTUDENT ADVOCACY INC — $75,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetUCLA FOUNDATION — $75,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC — $70,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF PUERTO RICO INC — $62,500 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetTHE KENYON REVIEW — $60,000 over 1y, 3.2% of budgetCITY HARVEST INC — $55,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOOD BANK FOR NEW YORK CITY — $55,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBROOME STREET ACADEMY CHARTER HIGH SCHOOL — $50,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetThe Madeira School — $50,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetSQUASH HAVEN INC — $50,000 over 1y, 4.2% of budgetPEN AMERICAN CENTER INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCITYMEALS-ON-WHEELS — $30,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetValley of the Sun Young Men's Christian Association — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetEARTHJUSTICE — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLDWIDE FISTULA FUND — $25,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetCHARITY GLOBAL INC — $25,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSUSTAINABLE FOOD CENTER — $25,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetSKY'S THE LIMIT FUND — $25,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetARTTABLE INC — $20,000 over 1y, 2.8% of budgetNONPROFIT CENTER OF THE BERKSHIRES INC — $20,000 over 1y, 11% of budgetCENTER FOR TRANSFORMATIVE ACTION — $17,000 over 2y, 0.5% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANGELICA PATIENT ASSISTANCE PROGRAM — $15,000 over 1y, 6.4% of budgetPLANNED PARENTHOOD OF SOUTHERN NEW ENGLAND INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBROADWAY CARESEQUITY FIGHTS AIDS INC — $15,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTRUTH BE TOLD — $14,000 over 3y, 2.4% of budgetHUDSON RIVER MUSEUM OF WESTCHESTER — $10,888 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetPOETRY SOCIETY OF AMERICA — $10,000 over 1y, 1.5% of budgetEquality Now Inc — $10,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetONEGOAL — $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREAD TO GROW INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetAmerican Museum of Natural History — $9,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMOBILE LOAVES & FISHES INC — $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCITY OF ASYLUM — $5,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetCHESS-IN-THE-SCHOOLS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Jewish Communal FundGlenn Greenberg and L…The Ford FoundationThe Community Foundat…Jpmorgan Chase Founda…Austin Community Foun…The Pfizer Foundation…The Goldman Sachs Cha…National Philanthropi…The Chicago Community…The Bank of America C…Vanguard Charitable E…
Jewish Communal FundNY28.1× affinity17 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Jewish Communal Fund · Glenn Greenberg and Linda Vester Foundation Inc · The Ford Foundation · The Community Foundation of Eastern Connecticut Inc · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Austin Community Foundation Inc · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · The Chicago Community Trust · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Mj & Caral G Lebworth Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%1%5%11%20%your share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 10%
  • Nonprofit Center of the Berkshires Inc — 18% of income from government
  • Garde Arts Center Inc — 10% of income from government
  • Planned Parenthood of Southern New England Inc — 10% of income from government
  • Squash Haven Inc — 4% of income from government
  • Eugene O'neill Memorial Theater Center Inc — 1% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation — 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
18report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Mj & Caral G Lebworth Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Mj & Caral G Lebworth Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 68 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home
State money flows
the interactive map of money crossing state lines