Who are The Mitchell L and Miriam Lewis Barnett Charitable Trust's largest grantees?

By total granted over FY2018 to FY2025: Greenhill School ($150k), Jewish National Fund-Usa Inc ($41k), Parish Episcopal School ($29k).

Does The Mitchell L and Miriam Lewis Barnett Charitable Trust accept unsolicited applications?

Its most recent filing reports that it accepts unsolicited grant applications.

Which funders back the same organizations as The Mitchell L and Miriam Lewis Barnett Charitable Trust?

Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Mb and Edna Zale Foundation, Texas Instruments Foundation, Dallas Jewish Community Foundation.

The Mitchell L and Miriam Lewis Barnett Charitable Trust

The Mitchell L and Miriam Lewis Barnett Charitable Trust at a glance

· Private foundation

The Mitchell L and Miriam Lewis Barnett Charitable Trust

Q: How much does The Mitchell L and Miriam Lewis Barnett Charitable Trust give?

The Mitchell L and Miriam Lewis Barnett Charitable Trust reported 21 grants totaling $127,135 in its FY2025 IRS filing. It funded between 10 and 37 organizations a year over FY2018 to FY2024.

Q: What does The Mitchell L and Miriam Lewis Barnett Charitable Trust fund?

By grant dollars over FY2018 to FY2025, its largest causes are Education (58%), Philanthropy (21%), Health (7%).

Q: Does The Mitchell L and Miriam Lewis Barnett Charitable Trust fund new organizations?

In FY2024, 38% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.

Q: Where is The Mitchell L and Miriam Lewis Barnett Charitable Trust based?

The Mitchell L and Miriam Lewis Barnett Charitable Trust is based in TX.

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$127k

Granted FY2025still arriving

Grants FY2025still arriving

States reached

$41k

Largest

01What it funds

0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$631kPhilanthropy$229kHealth$71kInternational$54kReligion$37kHuman Services$25kArts & Culture$11kCivil Rights$10kOther$0

02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

Under $10k18 grants · $33k
$10k–50k3 grants · $95k

$1,036

Median grant

States reached

$612k

Total assets

Largest grants
Recipient	Amount
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND-USA	$41,000
GREENHILL SCHOOL	$40,000
JEWISH FEDERATION OF GREATER DALLAS	$13,500
AMERICAN JEWISH JOINT DIST COMMITTE	$5,175
CONGREGATION SHEARITH ISRAEL	$4,016
PARISH EPISCOPAL SCHOOL	$4,000
HADASSAH HOSPITAL	$3,854
NORTH TEXAS FOOD BANK	$3,099
NATIONAL COUNCIL OF JEWISH WOMEN	$2,240
AMERICAN JEWISH COMMITTEE	$1,047
HILLEL INTERNATIONAL	$1,036
BIRTHRIGHT ISRAEL FOUNDATION	$1,032
CONGREGATION OHEV SHALOM	$1,030
JEWISH FEDERATION OF LOS ANGELES	$1,026
FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCE	$1,000

02The need

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–24, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

How this is measured

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

How this is measured

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.

03Its grantees

repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

91%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.

$789k · 37 repeat orgs$78k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +39% since the first grant, against +34% for those funded once.

37 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

Total granted

$789k

$32k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+39%

+34%

Still filing today

65%

52%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 59% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $46k went to new ones.

RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

HealthEducationInternationalHuman ServicesArts & CultureCivil RightsOther

How this is measured

First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

GS
GREENHILL SCHOOL
7× · 2018–2025 · $150k · revenue +62%
PE
PARISH EPISCOPAL SCHOOL
6× · 2019–2025 · $29k · revenue +12%
BH
Baylor Health Care System Foundation
2× · 2018–2019 · $10k · revenue +57%

Funded once

JF
JEWISH FOUNDATION OF MANITOBA USA
one grant, 2019 · $9k
TJ
THE JEWISH FOUNDATION OF MANITOBA USA INCgraduated
one grant, 2021 · $8k · revenue +536% · 48% of their budget
TC
THE CENTER FOR MIND BODY INSTITUTE
one grant, 2024 · $3k

How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

The Jewish Museum

The mission of the jewish museum is to collect, preserve, exhibit and interpret art and jewish culture. see schedule o for more information.

Arts & Culture

Torah Day School of Dallas

Torah Day School of Dallas is a day school for jewish children grades kindergarden through eigth grade along with pre-school for one through four year old jewish children. The school provides a general studies and secular education meeting…

Education

The Jewish Agency for Israel

The jewish agency binds jews across ideologies and civilizations together in a worldwide jewish family with israel at its center. it provides the global framework for aliyah, ensures global jewish safety, strengthens jewish identity and…

—

Dallas Jewish Community Foundation

To be your partner and trusted expert in charitable giving and effective philanthropy by empowering our community's charitable vision, safeguarding our community's resources and building enduring legacies.

Philanthropy

Abraham Joshua Heschel Day School

Abraham joshua heschel day school cultivates students' natural sense of wonder into an exceptionally rich education that encourages critical thinking, creativity, and compassion. in partnership with our families, we inspire our students to…

—

Hebrew Academy of Cleveland

The mission of the hebrew academy is to imbue all students with a love of god, torah and eretz yisroel and to prepare them to achieve excellence in torah and general knowledge based on successful cooperation among family, judaic and…

—

Jewish Federation Council of Greater La

Based on jewish values, the jewish federation of greater los angeles convenes and leads the community and leverages its resources to assure the continuity of the jewish people, support a secure state of israel, care for jews in need here…

Philanthropy

San Diego Jewish Academy

San Diego Jewish Academy empowers each student to learn for life, guided by Jewish values and rooted in strength of community.

Education

The Jewish Fund

The jewish fund is organized and operates exclusively for charitable, educational, and religious purposes. the fund's primary activities are: supporting a jewish health care mission in the greater detroit area and michigan; promotion of…

Philanthropy

Jewish Day School of Metropolitan Seattle

Jds is committed to providing an innovative academic program through a rigorous integrated, inquiry-based curriculum with general & judaic studies, empowering children to grow into capable, wise, and compassionate upstanders.

Education

Minneapolis Jewish Federation

Minneapolis jewish federation is a nonprofit organization that promotes a culture of philanthropy, leverages resources to meet local and global jewish needs, and facilitates community planning to ensure a thriving and secure future.

Philanthropy

Texas Jewish Security Initiative

Crime & Legal

How this is measured

The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Jewish Federation of Greater Dallas; the most unlike its peers is Dme Exchange of Dallas Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 79 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)

Early backer (in before they grew)

47/48

Grantees still filing

34/48

Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Other$613,083Philanthropy$219,060Education$154,575International$53,848Health$16,913Human Services$14,545Arts & Culture$7,730

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Mb and Edna Zale FoundationTX26.1× affinity10 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Mb and Edna Zale Foundation · Texas Instruments Foundation · Dallas Jewish Community Foundation · Morton H Meyerson Family Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Ike & Fannie Sablosky Foundation W00768400 · Sylvan T Baer Foundation · The Jeff & Bonnie Whitman Charitable Foundation · Margot Rosenberg Pulitzer Foundation · Edward & Wilhelmina Ackerman Foundation · The Mankoff Family Foundation · Laurie and Todd Platt Family Charitable Foundation

How this is measured

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Mitchell L and Miriam Lewis Barnett Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Mitchell L and Miriam Lewis Barnett Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024

’20’21’22’23’24’25

no gov moneyreceives it· size = income

1get no government money at all

12report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)

0rely on government for over half their income

⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%

typical government reliance, FY20–25

How this is measured

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

Play a game based on Mitchell L and Miriam Lewis Barnett’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions

grants reported with no recipient in the public record

The regranting layer

51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer

The DAF merry-go-round

$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds

The endowment market

who holds foundation money, and what just moved

The camps

funders cluster by geography, not ideology

By state

where grant money is based, and what stays home