Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Michael-David Family Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$16k
Granted FY2024still arriving
1
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$16k
Largest
01What you fund
0143% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Philanthropy$269kArts & Culture$188kHealth$170kEducation$164kFood & Nutrition$135kHuman Services$117kYouth Development$38kRecreation & Sports$34kOther$0
02FY2024 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

$15,925
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE LOEL FOUNDATION$15,925
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 12%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%LODI ADOPT A CHILD: $10k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
ID
MT
IL
NY
NV
WY
IN
OH
CA
UT
NM
OK
TX
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

53%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$902k · 32 repeat orgs$802k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +89% since the first grant, against +28% for the ones you funded once.

32 repeat relationships — 0 still active in FY2024, 32 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

32
114

Total granted

$902k
$786k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+89%
+28%

Still filing today

16%
9%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 0% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $16k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthPhilanthropyArts & CultureYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EF
    EMERGENCY FOOD BANK
    6× · 2017–2022 · $63k · revenue +89%
  • LH
    LODI HOUSE
    2× · 2017–2022 · $17k · revenue +95%
  • LB
    LODI BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB INC
    2× · 2018–2022 · $15k · revenue +330%

Funded once

  • LC
    LODI COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC
    one grant, 2023 · $249k
  • US
    UC SANTA CRUZ-RESPIRATORY VIRUS FUND
    one grant, 2020 · $100k
  • US
    UC SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2021 · $43k · revenue -15%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Foundation of California State University Monterey Bay

To further the scientific, literary, educational and charitable purposes of california state university, monterey bay, including fundraising, development, endowment management, financial assistance, public relations and other support.

Education
2
Califonia State University East Bay Foundation Inc

Csu east bay foundation is an auxiliary organization of california state university east bay and the california state university system. the organization's mission is to provide services that aid, supplement, and advance the educational…

Education
3
California State University Foundation

Established in 1962, the foundation is the central foundation for the california state university (csu) system and serves the office of the chancellor. the foundation exists to support excellence in teaching and learning, and to serve the…

Philanthropy
4
California State University Alumni Association

Connect, engage and celebrate alumni, students and friends of sacramento state while building lifelong relationships that support the future of our university.

Education
5
California Lutheran University

The mission of the university is to educate leaders for a global society who are strong in character and judgment, confident in their identity and vocation, and committed to service and justice.

Education
6
Loma Linda University Children's Hospital Foundation

Our children's hospital foundation is dedicated to supporting loma linda university children's hospital's mission to bring whole-child healthcare to the region and beyond.

7
California State University Los Angeles Foundation

To advance the educational, cultural, scholarly, and creative activities and the role of community service of csula by increasing private funding, responsibly managing donated resources and supporting the university and its diverse and…

Education
8
Lodi District Chamber of Commerce

Promote the city of lodi including the businesses, industries and residents of northern san joaquin county.

9
Cal State East Bay Educational Foundation

To accept and manage restricted and unrestricted gifts benefiting california state university east bay. additionally, the trustees support the university through advocacy, development, personal contributions and counsel to the university's…

Education
10
Cal Poly Humboldt Foundation

See schedule othe cal poly humboldt foundation provides expertise, fiduciary oversight and advocacy to increase charitable giving and manage the endowment and other charitable funds. the foundation serves humboldt state university in…

Education
11
Long Beach State Foundation

The foundation seeks, secures and manages private support for california state university, long beach. (see schedule o)as the philanthropic foundation for the university, all donations in support of our students, faculty, programs and…

Education
12
Loma Linda University

Loma linda university, a seventh-day adventist christian health sciences institution, seeks to further the healing and teaching ministry of jesus christ "to make man whole" by: - educating ethical and proficient christian health…

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Lodi Boys and Girls Club Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Loel Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

16 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 16 of the 147 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
16/16
Grantees still filing
8/16
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Individual grant recipient — $120,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUC SANTA CRUZ-RESPIRATORY VIRUS FUND — $100,000 · OtherUC SANTA CRUZ-RESPIRATORY VIRUS FUNDIndividual grant recipient — $98,626 · OtherIndividual grant recipientLOEL SENIOR CENTER — $68,625 · OtherLOEL SENIOR CENTERIndividual grant recipient — $65,293 · OtherIndividual grant recipientEMERGENCY FOOD BANK — $63,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $62,825 · OtherUC FOUNDATION - FITZSIMMONS STUDENT AWARD — $54,600 · OtherHERITAGE DISTILLING- SANITIZER DONATION — $40,521 · Other+126 more — $512,803 · Other+126 moreLODI COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC — $249,000 · PhilanthropyLODI COMMUNITY FO…THE GRACE AND MERCY FOUNDATION INC — $20,000 · PhilanthropyTHE GRACE AND MER…WORLD OF WONDERS SCIENCE MUSEUM — $122,500 · Arts & CultureUC SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION — $42,935 · EducationCALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $25,000 · EducationCAL POLY CORPORATION — $8,000 · EducationLODI HOUSE — $17,000 · Housing & ShelterLODI BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB INC — $14,500 · Youth DevelopmentLODI ADOPT-A-CHILD — $10,000 · Human ServicesALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $5,000 · HealthDOLPHINS CYCLING CHALLENGE INC — $3,000 · HealthRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE NEW MEXICO — $500 · Health
Other$1,186,293Philanthropy$269,000Arts & Culture$122,500Education$75,935Housing & Shelter$17,000Youth Development$14,500Human Services$10,000Health$8,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetWORLD OF WONDERS SCIENCE MUSEUM — $122,500 over 2y, 9.4% of budgetEMERGENCY FOOD BANK — $63,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetUC SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION — $42,935 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetChildren's Home of Stockton Inc — $29,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetCALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $25,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLODI HOUSE — $17,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetTHE LOEL FOUNDATION — $15,925 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetLODI BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB INC — $14,500 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetLODI ADOPT-A-CHILD — $10,000 over 1y, 13% of budgetCAL POLY CORPORATION — $8,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSAN JOAQUIN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION — $6,050 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE & RELATED DISORDERS ASSOCIATION INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDOLPHINS CYCLING CHALLENGE INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE NEW MEXICO — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds LODI COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds WORLD OF WONDERS SCIENCE MUSEUM
  • Who funds EMERGENCY FOOD BANK
  • Who funds UC SANTA CRUZ FOUNDATION
  • Who funds Children's Home of Stockton Inc
  • Who funds CALIFORNIA POLYTECHNIC STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE GRACE AND MERCY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds LODI HOUSE
  • Who funds THE LOEL FOUNDATION
  • Who funds LODI BOYS AND GIRLS CLUB INC
  • Who funds LODI ADOPT-A-CHILD
  • Who funds CAL POLY CORPORATION
  • Who funds SAN JOAQUIN FARM BUREAU FEDERATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Crete Family FoundationWA15.7× affinity5 shared granteesties to 8 of 8Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Crete Family Foundation · The Cortopassi Family Foundation · Charles and Shirlene Clark Family Foundation · The Antone and Marie Raymus Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Michael-David Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 10%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    1get no government money at all
    4report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 147 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph