Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Mevatec Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$22k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Religion$383kEducation$280kEmployment$35kCrime & Legal$19kHuman Services$10kHealth$5kFood & Nutrition$2kRecreation & Sports$2kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k4 grants · $12k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,000
Median grant
3
States reached
$1.2M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE AWARENESS PROJECT$10,000
EF EDUCATIONAL FOUNDATION$5,824
ST JOHN PAUL II CATHOLIC$5,000
MADISON COUNTY HIGH SCHOOL$1,000
SMCC SISTER OF CHARITY$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–20, $4k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 63% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FORT WORTH HOPE CENTER: $2k → 11%BRIGHTER TOMORROW: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IN
PA
CO
NE
NM
TN
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

90%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$660k · 9 repeat orgs$74k to everyone else

9 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
17

Total granted

$660k
$68k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+49%
+52%

Still filing today

11%
47%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 71% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthPhilanthropyOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH CATHOLIC CHURCH
    3× · 2022–2024 · $360k
  • HF
    HOLY FAMILY SCHOOL
    2× · 2023–2024 · $226k
  • TA
    THE AWARENESS PROJECT
    4× · 2022–2025 · $35k · revenue +0%

Funded once

  • SF
    SCHOLARSHIPS FOR KIDS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $30k · revenue +78%
  • SI
    SW INDIAN FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • CS
    CRISIS SERVICES
    one grant, 2020 · $6k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Childrens Center

The mission of childrens center is to support and medically assess children who are suspected victims of abuse or neglect.

Crime & Legal
2
Memphis Child Advocacy Center

The mission is to serve children who are victims of sexual and severe physical abuse through prevention, education, and intervention.

Crime & Legal
3
Women Against Abuse Inc

The mission of women against abuse is to provide quality, compassionate, and nonjudgmental services in a manner that fosters self-respect and independence in persons experiencing intimate partner violence and to lead the struggle to end…

Human Services
4
Hubbard House Inc

Safety, empowerment, and social change for victims of domestic violence and their families. to that end we offer a full compendium of services for victims of domestic violence.

Human Services
5
The Wichita Children's Home

To assure the safety and well-being of children and to create heathly families by providing: assessment and intervention services; a temporary home for children at risk of abuse, neglect, or homelessness; education, prevention and advocacy…

Human Services
6
The Parent Child Ctr of Tulsa Inc

To prevent child abuse and neglect through education, treatment, and advocacy. the parent child center of tulsa (pcct) has been serving the tulsa community and surrounding areas since 1990. in 2024, pcct served more than 96,000 infants,…

—
7
East Tennessee Children's Hospital Association Inc

East tennessee children's hospital is a free-standing, independent, not-for-profit pediatric health care system which serves the east tennessee region. children's hospital is certified by the state of tennessee as a comprehensive regional…

Health
8
Mission Kids Child Advocacy Center

Achieving healing & justice for victims of child abuse by providing collaborative services, advocacy, leadership and education.

Crime & Legal
9
Hopeful Horizons

Hopeful horizons is the only children's advocacy, domestic violence and sexual assault victim service organization serving area of over 3,200 square miles. our mission is to protect, treat and prevent, which is inspired by the goals of…

Religion
10
Ability Kc

Our mission is to build brighter futures for children and adults with disabilities by providing comprehensive medical, therapeutic, educational, and vocational services.

—
11
Walker County Childrens Advocacy Center Inc

Walker County Childrens Advocacy Center, Inc. will provide services to child victims of physical and sexual abuse, severely neglected children and children who have witnessed a violent crime. The Center will work every day to try and stop…

Human Services
12
Women's Center and Shelter of Greater Pittsburgh

The mission of women's center & shelter of greater pittsburgh is to strengthen our ability to meet the individual and evolving needs of those affected by domestic violence by investing in the growth of our people, deepening community…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Scholarships for Kids Inc; the most unlike its peers is The Awareness Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 30 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/12
Grantees still filing
10/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST JOSEPH CATHOLIC CHURCH: $360,125 · OtherST JOSEPH CATHOLIC CHURCHHOLY FAMILY SCHOOL: $226,000 · OtherHOLY FAMILY SCHOOLTHE AWARENESS PROJECT: $35,000 · Other+20 more: $74,574 · Other+20 moreSCHOLARSHIPS FOR KIDS INC: $30,000 · EducationBRIGHTER TOMORROWS INC: $2,500 · Human ServicesWHEELCHAIRS FOR WARRIORS: $2,500 · Human ServicesFORT WORTH HOPE CENTER THE HOPE CENTER: $1,500 · Human ServicesTHE HUNTSVILLE HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONINC: $1,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 · HealthUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC: $1,000 · Philanthropy
Other$695,699Education$30,000Human Services$6,500Health$2,000Philanthropy$1,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSCHOLARSHIPS FOR KIDS INC: $30,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetTHE ARC OF MADISON COUNTY INC: $12,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC: $3,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBRIGHTER TOMORROWS INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetWHEELCHAIRS FOR WARRIORS: $2,500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetOMAHA PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFORT WORTH HOPE CENTER THE HOPE CENTER: $1,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HUNTSVILLE HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONINC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE AWARENESS PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds SCHOLARSHIPS FOR KIDS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE ARC OF MADISON COUNTY INC ↗
  • Who funds NATIONAL CHILDREN'S ADVOCACY CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds Wings of a Butterfly ↗
  • Who funds BRIGHTER TOMORROWS INC ↗
  • Who funds WHEELCHAIRS FOR WARRIORS ↗
  • Who funds OMAHA PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FORT WORTH HOPE CENTER THE HOPE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds UNITED WAY OF CENTRAL ALABAMA INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HUNTSVILLE HOSPITAL FOUNDATIONINC ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Moody FoundationTX13.4× affinity4 shared granteesties to 7 of 7Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Moody Foundation · Communities Foundation of Texas Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Mevatec Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Mevatec Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mevatec’s filings →

    More from the funding graph