Skip to content

Virginia · Public charity

The Methuselah Foundation

Methuselah foundation works to accelerate technological breakthroughs in healthy human life extension through regenerative medicine and nutrition, research initiatives, start-up incubation, and open innovation challenges.

$456k
Granted FY2024(still arriving)
7
Itemized grants FY2024
5
Organizations funded FY2023
20%
First-time grantees FY2023
Read the full brief
Itemized, FY2024
$379k
The rest is grants the schedule does not break out
Median grant, FY2024
$50,000
Largest grant, FY2024
$100,000
Organizations funded a year
1 to 9
FY2017 to FY2023
States reached, FY2024
6
Total assets, FY2024
$20M

How open it is to new grantees

In FY2023, 20% of the organizations The Methuselah Foundation funded were first-time grantees, receiving 1% of its grant dollars.

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2023, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $25k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’20’21’22’23
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’20’21’22’23
HealthScience & TechEducationSocial ScienceFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
The numbers by year
Fiscal yearOrganizations fundedTo those organizationsFirst-time grantees
FY2024still arriving7$379k100%
FY20235$4.4M20%
FY20229$4.2M67%
FY20218$2.4M88%
FY20201$15k100%
FY20185$152k100%
FY20173$179kn/a
100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Science & Tech$7.3MHealth$3.9MFood & Nutrition$400kAnimals$100kEmployment$100k

Where its grants go

Grant dollars by states, across the years we hold.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
MA
OH
PA
CT
CA
UT
VA
MD
DC
TX
FL

Top grantees

Largest recipients by total granted, FY2017 to FY2024, and the share of each one’s budget the grants supplied at peak.

GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Ichor Research Institute Inc$6,613,3363n/a
Albert Einstein College of Medicine$1,050,00010%
Buck Institute for Research on Aging$650,00012%
The Alliance for Longevity Initiatives$525,000268%
Lifespan Extension Advocacy Foundation$405,000233%
Actual Food$400,0001n/a
ADG Lilico LLC$375,0001n/a
21st Century Medicine Inc$250,0001n/a
Center For the Advancement of Science In Space Inc$250,00012%
Healthspan Action Coalition Inc$200,000281%
Show all 26 grantees
All grantees of The Methuselah Foundation by total granted
GranteeTotal grantedYearsShare of their budget
Ichor Research Institute Inc$6,613,3363n/a
Albert Einstein College of Medicine$1,050,00010%
Buck Institute for Research on Aging$650,00012%
The Alliance for Longevity Initiatives$525,000268%
Lifespan Extension Advocacy Foundation$405,000233%
Actual Food$400,0001n/a
ADG Lilico LLC$375,0001n/a
21st Century Medicine Inc$250,0001n/a
Center For the Advancement of Science In Space Inc$250,00012%
Healthspan Action Coalition Inc$200,000281%
Orgonovo Holdings$125,0001n/a
ADG LiliCo LLC$125,0001n/a
Everest Health Partners LLC$100,0001n/a
Less Death Inc$100,000134%
Axolotl LLC$100,0001n/a
Center for Contemporary Sciences Inc$85,000223%
Everest Health Partners LLC$60,0001n/a
Amaranth LLC$50,0001n/a
Oisin Biotechnologies Inc$40,0001n/a
Lifespan Research Institution$34,16720%
Ora Biomedical Inc$25,0001n/a
Long Life Labs LLC$17,6632n/a
Parvo Medics Inc$16,2371n/a
Kumu Thrive$15,0001n/a
Mass General Brigham Incorporated$13,0001n/a
Moral Injury of Health Care Inc$10,00018%

Plus 4 recipients with no EIN on record ($172k), not named here.

Where it is load-bearing

The Methuselah Foundation supplied at least a quarter of the budget for 4 of its grantees at some point. The chart plots its 10 largest grantees; load-bearing ones sit top left.

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAlbert Einstein College of Medicine: $1,050,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBuck Institute for Research on Aging: $650,000 over 1y, 1.6% of budgetThe Alliance for Longevity Initiatives: $525,000 over 2y, 68% of budgetLifespan Extension Advocacy Foundation: $405,000 over 2y, 33% of budgetCenter For the Advancement of Science In Space Inc: $250,000 over 1y, 2.1% of budgetHealthspan Action Coalition Inc: $200,000 over 2y, 81% of budgetLess Death Inc: $100,000 over 1y, 34% of budgetCenter for Contemporary Sciences Inc: $85,000 over 2y, 23% of budgetLifespan Research Institution: $34,167 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetMoral Injury of Health Care Inc: $10,000 over 1y, 7.6% of budget

Tap a dot to name the grantee.

How this is measured
Share of budget is the funder’s grant in a year over the grantee’s total revenue that year, at its highest across the years we hold; revenue is from all sources. Only grantees confirmed against their own filings, whose grants do not exceed their revenue, are plotted: the largest 10.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA4.8× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Network for Good · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Compare The Methuselah Foundation with peer funders

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Methuselah Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Methuselah Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

About The Methuselah Foundation

How much does The Methuselah Foundation give?
The Methuselah Foundation reported 7 itemized grants totaling $379,237, out of $456,237 in total grant expense reported on the return in its FY2024 IRS filing. It funded between 1 and 9 organizations a year over FY2017 to FY2023.
What does The Methuselah Foundation fund?
By grant dollars over FY2017 to FY2024, its largest causes are Science & Tech (62%), Health (33%), Food & Nutrition (3%).
Who are The Methuselah Foundation's largest grantees?
By total granted over FY2017 to FY2024: Ichor Research Institute Inc ($6.6M), Albert Einstein College of Medicine ($1.1M), Buck Institute for Research on Aging ($650k).
Does The Methuselah Foundation fund new organizations?
In FY2023, 20% of the organizations it funded were first-time grantees.
Which funders back the same organizations as The Methuselah Foundation?
Its strongest co-funders, measured against what their size predicts, include Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program, Network for Good, American Online Giving Foundation Inc.
Where is The Methuselah Foundation based?
The Methuselah Foundation is based in VA.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 30 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Methuselah’s filings →

More from the funding graph