Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Meryl & Christopher Lewis Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$17k
Granted FY2025still arriving
21
Grants FY2025still arriving
6
States reached
$4k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$51kInternational$36kAnimals$19kHuman Services$17kReligion$13kFood & Nutrition$8kCommunity Improvement$6kEnvironment$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 21 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$500
Median grant
6
States reached
$445k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ST JUDES CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$3,500
WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN$1,500
AMERICAN CIVIL LIBERTIES UNION$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,200
MPN RESEARCH FOUNDATION$1,000
MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION$1,000
FEEDING WESTCHESTER$500
DOROT$500
HASTINGS ON HUDSON FIRE DEPARTMENT$500
LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION$500
OCD FOUNDATION$500
SPCA WESTCHESTER INC$500
HASTINGS YOUTH COUNCIL$500
GILDA'S CLUB$500
YONKERS ANIMAL SHELTER$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY18–25, $6k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 64% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LUSTGARTEN FOUNDATION: $500 → 6%COLLABORATIVE FOR PALLIATIVE CARE: $1k → 9%COLLABORATIVE FOR PALLIATIVE CARE: $500 → 17%DOROT: $500 → 17%DOROT: $500 → 17%DOROT: $500 → 17%DOROT: $500 → 17%DOROT: $500 → 17%DOROT: $500 → 17%FURNITURE SHAREHOUSE: $500 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
IA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
VA
TN
DC
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 7% of The Meryl & Christopher Lewis Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 69% of the giving stays in NY; by stated purpose, 65%.

The Meryl & Christopher Lewis Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address · 3.3% directed abroad (not shown)
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

76%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$125k · 42 repeat orgs$40k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +55% since the first grant, against +37% for those funded once.

42 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 24 since wound down; 3 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

42
57

Total granted

$125k
$38k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+55%
+37%

Still filing today

55%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 85% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $3k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
AnimalsHealthHuman ServicesInternationalPhilanthropyCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TM
    THE MPN RESEARCH FOUNDATION
    8× · 2018–2025 · $8k · revenue +68%
  • THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH
    5× · 2021–2025 · $5k · revenue +100%
  • PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION
    5× · 2018–2023 · $5k · revenue +91%

Funded once

  • J
    JDC
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • HI
    HEIFER INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2022 · $1k
  • MH
    MASSACHUSETTS HOSPITAL CANCER CENTER
    one grant, 2019 · $1k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
World Animal Protection

World animal protection is a global organization working to end factory farming and wildlife exploitation. we expose cruel systems, promote animal-friendly alternatives, and influence policy change. for over 75 years, we've been rewriting…

Animals
2
Global Animal Partnership
Animals
3
Animal Wellness Action

To prevent cruelty to animals, we promote enacting and enforcing good public policies. enacting good laws depends upon electing good lawmakers, and we remind voters which candidates care about and support animal issues.

Human Services
4
Humane World for Animals International

HUMANE WORLD FOR ANIMALS INTERNATIONAL, FKA HUMANE SOCIETY INTERNATIONAL (HSI), works around the globe to promote the human-animal bond, rescue and protect dogs and cats, improve farm animal welfare, protect wildlife, promote animal-free…

Animals
5
World Wildlife Fund Inc

Wwf's mission is to conserve nature and reduce the most pressing threats to the diversity of life on earth. (continued on schedule o)

Environment
6
American Humane Association

Founded in 1877, american humane association, dba american humane society (american humane) is committed to ensuring the safety, welfare and well-being of animals. our leadership programs are first to serve in promoting and nurturing the…

Animals
7
Four Paws International Inc

Our vision is a world where humans treat animals with respect, empathy and understanding. four paws mission is to be the strong, global and independent voice for animals.

Animals
8
600 Million Stray Dogs Need You Corporation

To end the #1 cause of suffering and death for dogs and cats globally, by developing food that will spay and neuter them, without surgery and end the overpopulation problem without killing.

Animals
9
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
10
The Susan G Komen Breast Cancer Fdn Group

Susan g. komen 's mission is to save lives by meeting the most critical needs in our communities & investing in breakthrough research to prevent & cure breast cancer.

—
11
Humane World Action Fund

To pass animal protection laws, educate the public, and support humane candidates for office.

Animals
12
Pet Animal Welfare Society of Connecticut Inc

Pet animal welfare society of ct (paws), established in 1962, is a no-kill animal rescue shelter dedicated to the rescue and adoption of our community's homeless and abused dogs and cats. paws efforts are focused on three critical needs:…

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is God's Love We Deliver Inc; the most unlike its peers is Planned Parenthood. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

50 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 50 of the 103 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
13
Early backer (in before they grew)
49/50
Grantees still filing
37/50
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ST JUDES CHILDRENS HOSPITAL: $13,500 · OtherST JUDES CHILDRENS HOSPITALIRC: $9,000 · OtherIRCIndividual grant recipient: $8,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGILDA'S CLUB: $7,000 · OtherGILDA'S CLUBIndividual grant recipient: $5,000 · Other+60 more: $63,750 · Other+60 moreAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $15,500 · InternationalAMERICAN JEWIS…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $4,000 · InternationalMEDECINS SANS …WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $2,000 · InternationalWORLD CENTRAL …AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $1,000 · International+2 more: $1,000 · InternationalTHE MPN RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $8,000 · HealthTHE MPN RESEAR…THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $5,000 · HealthTHE MICHAEL J …PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $5,000 · HealthPARTNERS IN HE…KIDS KICKING CANCER INC: $1,500 · HealthKIDS KICKING C…PLANNED PARENTHOOD: $1,000 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 · Health+4 more: $2,000 · Health+4 moreANIMALKIND INC: $3,000 · AnimalsBLUEPATH SERVICE DOGS INC: $2,500 · AnimalsPAWS CROSSED ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $2,000 · AnimalsPEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC: $1,500 · AnimalsSPCA OF WESTCHESTER INC: $1,000 · AnimalsANIMAL EDUCATION AND RESCUE NFP: $1,000 · AnimalsORPHANS OF THE STORM: $500 · AnimalsFARM SANCTUARY INC: $500 · AnimalsWildlife Conservation Society: $500 · AnimalsHumane World for Animals Inc: $500 · AnimalsTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $500 · AnimalsDOROT INC: $3,000 · Human ServicesCOLLABORATIVE FOR PALLIATIVE CARE: $1,500 · Human ServicesAARP FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Human ServicesFURNITURE SHAREHOUSE INC: $500 · Human ServicesThe MISS Foundation Mothers in Sympathy & Support: $500 · Human ServicesMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $500 · Human ServicesTHE HEART FOUNDATION: $2,000 · PhilanthropyJonah Maccabee Foundation Inc: $1,000 · Philanthropy(914) CARES INC: $500 · PhilanthropySANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $2,000 · Crime & LegalEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC: $500 · Crime & Legal
Other$106,750International$23,500Health$23,500Animals$13,500Human Services$7,000Philanthropy$3,500Crime & Legal$2,500

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetAMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC: $15,500 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE MPN RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $8,000 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $4,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetDOROT INC: $3,000 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetANIMALKIND INC: $3,000 over 5y, 0.2% of budgetBLUEPATH SERVICE DOGS INC: $2,500 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetFEEDING WESTCHESTER INC: $2,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHOPES DOOR INC: $2,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPAWS CROSSED ANIMAL RESCUE INC: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC: $2,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HEART FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetSANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION: $2,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC: $1,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFAMILY TO FAMILY INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetNUNATAKS LTD D/B/A GREENBURGH NATURE CENTER: $1,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetKIDS KICKING CANCER INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLABORATIVE FOR PALLIATIVE CARE: $1,500 over 2y, 3.5% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPCA OF WESTCHESTER INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBL GIRLS TOWN JERUSALEM INC: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetANIMAL EDUCATION AND RESCUE NFP: $1,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJonah Maccabee Foundation Inc: $1,000 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAARP FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFURNITURE SHAREHOUSE INC: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetORPHANS OF THE STORM: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOD'S LOVE WE DELIVER INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget(914) CARES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetInternational OCD Foundation Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNTERMYER GARDENS CONSERVANCY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFARM SANCTUARY INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUDSON VALLEY PET FOOD PANTRY INC: $500 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetWildlife Conservation Society: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEB RESEARCH PARTNERSHIP INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWNET: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICARES FOUNDATION INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe MISS Foundation Mothers in Sympathy & Support: $500 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetAMERICAN FOUNDATION FOR SUICIDE PREVENTION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSTEPPING STONES MUSEUM FOR CHILDREN INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEVERYTOWN FOR GUN SAFETY SUPPORT FUND INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBIRD ALLIANCE OF OREGON INC: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Foundation for Peripheral Neuropathy: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumane World for Animals Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMARC LUSTGARTEN PANCREATIC CANCER FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds AMERICAN JEWISH WORLD SERVICE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MPN RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds PARTNERS IN HEALTH A NONPROFIT CORPORATION ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds DOROT INC ↗
  • Who funds ANIMALKIND INC ↗
  • Who funds BLUEPATH SERVICE DOGS INC ↗
  • Who funds FEEDING WESTCHESTER INC ↗
  • Who funds HOPES DOOR INC ↗
  • Who funds PAWS CROSSED ANIMAL RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD CENTRAL KITCHEN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HEART FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds SANDY HOOK PROMISE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds PEOPLE FOR THE ETHICAL TREATMENT OF ANIMALS INC ↗
  • Who funds FAMILY TO FAMILY INC ↗
  • Who funds NUNATAKS LTD D/B/A GREENBURGH NATURE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds KIDS KICKING CANCER INC ↗
  • Who funds COLLABORATIVE FOR PALLIATIVE CARE ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Pfizer Foundation IncNY15.3× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Pfizer Foundation Inc · The Daly Family Foundation Inc · The Thomas and Agnes Carvel Foundation · Jewish Community Foundation of Los Angeles · Verizon Foundation · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Jewish Communal Fund · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Meryl & Christopher Lewis Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Meryl & Christopher Lewis Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Stepping Stones Museum for Children Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Sandy Hook Promise Foundation: 0% of income from government
  • Bird Alliance of Oregon Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Americares Foundation Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Partners in Health a Nonprofit Corporation: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Meryl & Christopher Lewis Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Meryl & Christopher Lewis Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 103 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Meryl & Christopher Lewis’ filings →

More from the funding graph