Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Meinders Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$69k
Granted FY2024still arriving
10
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$25k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

56% of The Meinders Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 21 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2024, the last year The Meinders Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 6 organizations, $69k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

26
’20
22
’21
18
’22
10
’23
6
’24
21
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0199% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2025.

Philanthropy$39MHealth$18MEducation$8.3MReligion$5.6MYouth Development$1.6MCivil Rights$750kPublic Safety & Disaster$503kArts & Culture$455kOther$0
02FY2024 · 10 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $34k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $35k
$5,920
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$25,000
ON WITH LIFE$10,000
CASHION PUBLIC SCHOOLS$7,500
OKLAHOMA SCHOOL OF SCIENCE AND MATH$7,181
OKLAHOMA CITY UNIVERSITY$5,920
NATURE CONSERVANCY$5,000
MYRIAD GARDENS FOUNDATION$3,000
OKLAHOMA CARING FOUNDATION$2,500
PRISON DISCIPLESHIP$2,000
ST ANTHONY FOUNDATION$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $527k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%HOUSE OF HEALING: $2k → 9%OKLAHOMA CARING FOUNDATION: $5k → 15%OKLAHOMA CARING FOUNDATION: $5k → 15%OKLAHOMA CARING FOUNDATION: $3k → 15%OKLAHOMA CARING FOUNDATION: $3k → 15%HEARTS FOR HEARING: $250k → 16%CALM WATERS: $5k → 16%CALM WATERS: $5k → 16%SISU YOUTH SERVICES: $400 → 16%CONCORDIA COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $250k → 16%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
NY
WY
IA
IN
UT
NE
MO
VA
OK
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 15% of The Meinders Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The Meinders Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

56%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$19M · 31 repeat orgs$15M to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +40% since the first grant, against +33% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 7 still active in FY2024, 24 since wound down; 30 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call). Read against FY2024, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
17

Total granted

$19M
$77k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+40%
+33%

Still filing today

77%
53%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 55% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15M went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureHealthHuman ServicesEnvironmentEmploymentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation
    2× · 2020–2025 · $6.3M · revenue +44%
  • OC
    OKLAHOMA CITY UNIVERSITY
    6× · 2020–2025 · $4.1M · revenue +16%
  • OW
    ON WITH LIFE INC
    6× · 2020–2025 · $1.1M · revenue +64%

Funded once

  • CC
    CHEYENNE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM FKA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF CHEYENNEgraduated
    one grant, 2022 · $25k · revenue +858% · 28% of their budget
  • CK
    CAVETT KIDS FOUNDATION INCgraduated
    one grant, 2021 · $10k · revenue +56%
  • OS
    OKLAHOMA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIO
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Oklahoma Newspaper Foundation
Arts & Culture
2
Oklahoma State Chamber of Commerce and Industry Inc

The State Chamber is a statewide membership organization. Our purpose is to be the unified voice of business and the most effective advocacy organization at the State Capitol.

—
3
Oklahoma Council of Public Affairs Inc

To promote the flourishing of the people of oklahoma by advancing principles and policies that support free enterprise, limited government, personal responsibility, and individual initiative.

Public Safety & Disaster
4
Oklahoma Health Sciences Facility

To enhance and promote the educational mission and delivery of healthcare of the University of Oklahoma Health Sciences Center through the acquisition improvement and development of various and sundry facilities and performing of any an…

Education
5
Foundation for a Healthy Oklahoma

The mission of the Foundation for a Healthy Oklahoma is exclusively for charitable, educational, and scientific purposes. The activities of the Corporation may include: (A) Promoting the good health and welfare (continued on Schedule O)

Health
6
Osteopathic Founders Foundation

The mission of the osteopathic founders foundation is to support osteopathic medical education, to enhance the public's understanding of osteopathic medicine, and to improve the health of the community through projects consistent with the…

Health
7
The State Chamber Research Foundation

The State Chamber Research Foundation strives to support Oklahoma's growth and increase prosperity for all Oklahomans. We create solution orientated programming, advance research and policy, and provide sound data geared to advancing…

Unclassified
8
Oklahoma City Beautiful Inc

OKC Beautiful's mission is to lead beautification and environmental stewardship through collaboration, education and advocacy. We have been doing this for over 50 years through volunteers and contributing donors. This directly impacts the…

Environment
9
Downtown Oklahoma City Inc

The organization's mission is to create and champion a vibrant and diverse downtown through placemaking, advocacy, and promotion.

Community Improvement
10
Oklahoma Educational Memorial Trust Fdn

Providing, maintaining and issuing scholarships to eligible nominees or applicants for admission to college or for contributions to regularly maintained scholarship funds of other federal tax exempt colleges and universities with an…

Education
11
Oklahoma Heart Research and Education Foundation Inc
Health
12
Northwest Oklahoma Blood Institute
—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Prison Discipleship Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

46 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 46 of the 82 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
12
Early backer (in before they grew)
46/46
Grantees still filing
33/46
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

OKLAHOMA CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $38,750,000 · PhilanthropyOKLAHOMA CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INCMERCY HEALTH FOUNDATION: $6,270,230 · OtherMERCY HEALTH FOUNDATIONCROSSINGS COMMUNITY CHURCH: $2,005,000 · OtherCROSSINGS COMMUNITY CHURC…CONCORDIA SEMINARY: $1,500,000 · OtherCONCORDIA SEMINARYCONCORDIA THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY: $1,500,000 · OtherCONCORDIA THEOLOGICAL SEM…ON WITH LIFE INC: $1,050,000 · OtherON WITH LIFE INCJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT: $1,000,000 · OtherJUNIOR ACHIEVEMENTLAMBDA CHI ALPHA FOUNDATION: $750,000 · Other+41 more: $3,007,649 · Other+41 moreOklahoma Medical Research Foundation: $6,253,500 · HealthOklahoma Medica…MAYO CLINIC: $3,000,000 · HealthMAYO CLINICTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $1,000,000 · HealthTHE MICHAEL J F…+4 more: $117,500 · HealthOKLAHOMA CITY UNIVERSITY: $4,148,360 · EducationOKLAHOMA CIT…Oklahoma Christian University: $2,000,000 · EducationOklahoma Chr…CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY: $1,500,000 · EducationCONCORDIA UN…UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $300,000 · Education+7 more: $449,600 · Education+7 moreConcordia Community Foundation: $250,000 · Human ServicesHearts for Hearing Foundation: $250,000 · Human ServicesOutrageous Love Inc: $24,500 · Human Services+4 more: $26,900 · Human ServicesOKLAHOMA HALL OF FAME: $260,000 · Arts & CultureCHEYENNE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM FKA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF CHEYENNE: $25,000 · Arts & Culture+5 more: $17,750 · Arts & CultureMYRIAD GARDENS FOUNDATION: $18,000 · Environment
Philanthropy$38,750,000Other$17,082,879Health$10,371,000Education$8,397,960Human Services$551,400Arts & Culture$302,750Environment$18,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetOKLAHOMA CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC: $38,750,000 over 1y, 10% of budgetOklahoma Medical Research Foundation: $6,253,500 over 2y, 4.6% of budgetOKLAHOMA CITY UNIVERSITY: $4,148,360 over 6y, 3.0% of budgetOklahoma Christian University: $2,000,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetCONCORDIA UNIVERSITY: $1,500,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetON WITH LIFE INC: $1,050,000 over 6y, 4.1% of budgetTHE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH: $1,000,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC: $300,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetOKLAHOMA HALL OF FAME: $260,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetHearts for Hearing Foundation: $250,000 over 1y, 1.1% of budgetAmerican Floral Endowment: $200,000 over 1y, 4.4% of budgetOklahoma State University Foundation: $100,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFRANCIS TUTTLE FOUNDATION INC: $26,000 over 4y, 2.9% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetCHEYENNE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM FKA CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF CHEYENNE: $25,000 over 1y, 28% of budgetOutrageous Love Inc: $24,500 over 2y, 8.8% of budgetMYRIAD GARDENS FOUNDATION: $18,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetOklahoma Caring Foundation Inc: $15,000 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetPHILLIPS THEOLOGICAL SEMINARY CORPORATION: $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetPRISON DISCIPLESHIP INC: $12,000 over 4y, 5.0% of budgetREGIONAL FOOD BANK OF OKLAHOMA INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDEAN MCGEE EYE INSTITUTE: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetCAVETT KIDS FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetCALM WATERS CENTER FOR CHILDREN & FAMILIES INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.7% of budgetThe Meadows Center for Opportunity Inc: $8,500 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetCOMMUNITY LITERACY CENTERS INC: $7,500 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetBRIGHTMUSIC SOCIETY OF OKLAHOMA: $7,000 over 3y, 5.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA FOUNDATION FOR EXCELLENCE: $6,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetOKLAHOMA SENIOR FOLLIES INC: $6,000 over 2y, 6.1% of budgetSMART START CENTRAL OKLAHOMA INC: $5,000 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetPUTNAM CITY PUBLIC SCHOOLS FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 2y, 0.8% of budgetTHE ST ANTHONY HOSPITAL FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetOklahoma Israel Exchange Inc: $3,600 over 1y, 1.0% of budgetOLDE CAPITOL HILL COUNCIL INC: $3,250 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetOKLAHOMA CENTER FOR NONPROFITS INC: $3,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOKLAHOMA PROJECT WOMAN INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetGROUND ZERO EMERGENCY TRAINING CENTER FOUNDATION: $2,500 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetHouse of Healing Inc: $1,500 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetOKLAHOMA PHILHARMONIC SOCIETY INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPIPESTONE COUNTY HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSISU YOUTH INC: $400 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds OKLAHOMA CITY COMMUNITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA CITY UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds Oklahoma Christian University ↗
  • Who funds CONCORDIA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds ON WITH LIFE INC ↗
  • Who funds THE MICHAEL J FOX FOUNDATION FOR PARKINSON'S RESEARCH ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF OKLAHOMA FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds OKLAHOMA HALL OF FAME ↗
  • Who funds Concordia Community Foundation ↗
  • Who funds Hearts for Hearing Foundation ↗
  • Who funds American Floral Endowment ↗
  • Who funds Ronald McDonald House Charities of Tulsa ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds HOPE IS ALIVE MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds Oklahoma State University Foundation ↗
  • Who funds FRANCIS TUTTLE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

El and Thelma Gaylord FoundationOK48.7× affinity21 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: El and Thelma Gaylord Foundation · Oklahoma City Community Foundation Inc · American Fidelity Foundation · Inasmuch Foundation · Communities Foundation of Oklahoma · Sarkeys Foundation · Rainbolt Family Foundation · Kirkpatrick Foundation Inc · The Ann Lacy Foundation · Fred Jones Family Foundation · Oge Energy Corp Foundation Inc · Kirkpatrick Family Affiliated Fund of Occf Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Meinders Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Meinders Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 210%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →median 1%
  • Oklahoma Medical Research Foundation: 31% of income from government
  • Dean Mcgee Eye Institute: 1% of income from government
  • Oklahoma Christian University: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
21get no government money at all
14report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Meinders Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Meinders Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 82 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Meinders’ filings →

More from the funding graph