Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Medway Charitable Trust

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$265k
Granted FY2025still arriving
47
Grants FY2025still arriving
12
States reached
$20k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Environment$357kHealth$322kAnimals$280kEducation$221kRecreation & Sports$185kPhilanthropy$138kFood & Nutrition$119kArts & Culture$102kOther$0
02FY2025 · 47 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k37 grants · $112k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $153k
$5,000
Median grant
12
States reached
$4.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MOUNT DESERT NURSING ASSOCIATION$20,000
WYOMING COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$20,000
FOXCROFT SCHOOL$20,000
UNIVERSITY OF MAINE$20,000
BLUE RIDGE SCHOOL$17,000
HIMALAYA CURRENTS INC$16,000
PLANNED PARENTHOOD$10,000
OAK SPRING GARDEN FOUNDATION$10,000
PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL$10,000
Southern Environmental Law Center$10,000
THREE SISTERS GARDEN PROJECT$5,000
OCEAN CONSERVANCY$5,000
NATIONAL TRUST FOR HISTORIC PRESERVATIO$5,000
BLUE RIDGE WILDLIFE CENTER$5,000
SEVEN LOAVES SERVICES INC$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–25, $49k) land where the poverty rate runs at 7%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 15% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BLUE RIDGE HOSPICE: $3k → 16%PERC INC: $10k → 9%BLUE RIDGE HOSPICE: $3k → 16%BLUE RIDGE HOSPICE: $963 → 16%SEVEN LOAVES SERVICES INC: $5k → 4%SEVEN LOAVES SERVICES INC: $1k → 4%PIEDMONT CHILD CARE CTR: $5k → 4%PIEDMONT CHILD CARE CTR: $5k → 4%PIEDMONT CHILD CARE CTR: $5k → 4%PIEDMONT CHILD CARE CTR: $5k → 4%PIEDMONT CHILD CARE CTR: $5k → 4%NEXT STEP DOMESTIC VIOLENCE PROJECT: $2k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

ME
VT
NH
WA
MN
NY
MA
WY
PA
NJ
CT
RI
CA
VA
MD
AZ
TN
NC
SC
DC
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.6M · 70 repeat orgs$266k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +43% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

70 repeat relationships: 35 still active in FY2025, 35 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

70
51

Total granted

$1.6M
$212k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+43%
+13%

Still filing today

66%
43%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 78% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $54k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EnvironmentAnimalsHuman ServicesHealthEducationInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MD
    MOUNT DESERT NURSING ASSOC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $94k · revenue +200%
  • TP
    THE PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL
    9× · 2017–2025 · $75k · revenue +161%
  • OS
    OAK SPRING GARDEN FOUNDATION
    7× · 2018–2025 · $70k · revenue +254%

Funded once

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2017 · $30k
  • WC
    WYOMING COMUNITY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $22k
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Wildcoast

The mission of wildcoast is to conserve coastal and marine ecosystems and address climate change through natural solutions. our staff is dedicated to conserving threatened and endangered coastlines and wildlife in california and mexico.…

Environment
2
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
3
Atlantic Coast Conservancy Inc

The mission of the atlantic coast conservancy is to provide 21st century solutions and sound scientific applications for conservation of critical natural resources in the face of a changing climate, focusing on the southeasthern united…

Environment
4
Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc

The nantucket conservation foundation owns, protects, and stewards over 9,000 acres of land and coastal shoreline, conserves nantucket's rare and significant natural resources, and engages in impactful ecological research to inform…

Environment
5
Fauna & Flora International Usa Inc

Our mission is to act to conserve threatened species and ecosystems worldwide, choosing solutions that are sustainable, based on sound science and take into account human needs.

Philanthropy
6
Amazon Conservation Association

Amazon conservation unites science, people, and innovation to protect the amazon - the greatest wild forest on earth. as guardians of the most iconic forest on the planet, we bring together the power of the latest science and technology…

Environment
7
Conservation Farms & Ranches

Preserving and enhancing the habitat of wildlife, such as sandhill cranes, waterfowl, raptors, which habitat expenses are supported by agricultural activities.

Housing & Shelter
8
Wildlife Conservation Global Inc

Wildlife conservation global, inc. operates the okapi conservation project (ocp) which works in the democratic republic of the congo with the institute in congo for the conservation of nature (iccn) and local communities throughout the…

Animals
9
Aquarium of the Pacific Corporation

The aquarium of the pacific's mission is to instill a sense of wonder, respect, and stewardship for the pacific ocean, its inhabitants, and ecosystems.

Animals
10
Environmental Investigation Agency

To establish and promote programs to protect the global climate, forests, wildlife and the natural environment, through research, advocacy, and investigation.

International
11
Land Conservancy of Ridgefield Inc

The Land Conservancy of Ridgefield, Inc. ("the Land Conservancy"), founded in 1967, preserves and protects, for the general benefit of the public, Ridgefield, Connecticut's natural resources including land and water resources, the plant…

Environment
12
Alaska Whale Foundation

Alaska Whale Foundation is dedicated to marine mammal conservation through research monitoring and education.

Environment
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Seeing Eye Inc; the most unlike its peers is Himalaya Currents Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

82 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 82 of the 135 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

2
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
22
Early backer (in before they grew)
80/82
Grantees still filing
55/82
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ACADIA FIRE FC INC: $178,500 · OtherACADIA FIRE FC INCFRIENDS OF SANFORD STUD FARM: $75,000 · OtherFRIENDS OF SANFORD STUD FARMGRANITE ART GARDEN: $37,500 · OtherOAK SPRING GARDEN FOUNDATION: $70,000 · OtherOAK SPRING GARDEN FOUNDATIONMOC BEAGLES INC: $45,000 · Other+85 more: $596,220 · Other+85 moreTHE PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL: $75,000 · EnvironmentTHE PIEDMONT…GOOSE CREEK ASSOCIATION: $40,000 · EnvironmentGOOSE CREEK …SHENANDOAH NATIONAL PARK TRUST: $35,000 · EnvironmentSHENANDOAH N…Friends of Acadia: $31,535 · EnvironmentFriends of A…NORTHEASTERN MINNESOTANS FOR WILDERNESS: $10,000 · EnvironmentOCEANA INC: $10,000 · Environment+7 more: $32,099 · Environment+7 moreMOUNT DESERT NURSING ASSOC: $93,750 · HealthMOUNT DESER…HIMALAYA CURRENTS INC: $51,000 · HealthHIMALAYA CU…ST MARYS HEALTH WAGON INC: $45,000 · HealthST MARYS HE…ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $17,500 · HealthALZHEIMER'S…+3 more: $9,500 · HealthWYOMING COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $113,000 · PhilanthropyWYOMING CO…BLUE RIDGE WILDLIFE CENTER: $60,000 · PhilanthropyBLUE RIDGE…CHAPEL & YORK US FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyCHAPEL & Y…+1 more: $5,000 · PhilanthropySEASIDE SEABIRD SANCTUARY: $50,000 · AnimalsTHE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA INC: $45,000 · AnimalsRED PANDA NETWORK: $27,500 · AnimalsACADIA WILDLIFE FOUNDATION: $21,823 · AnimalsLoudoun Wildlife Conservancy: $9,000 · Animals+3 more: $5,500 · AnimalsTHE BLUE RIDGE SCHOOL INC: $64,500 · EducationFoxcroft School: $55,000 · EducationHOLDERNESS SCHOOL: $30,000 · Education+3 more: $3,525 · EducationTHE SEEING EYE INC: $55,000 · Human ServicesPIEDMONT CHILD CARE CENTER INC: $25,000 · Human ServicesP E R C INC: $10,000 · Human ServicesSeven Loaves Services Inc: $6,272 · Human ServicesBLUE RIDGE HOSPICE INC: $5,963 · Human Services+2 more: $4,110 · Human Services
Other$1,002,220Environment$233,634Health$216,750Philanthropy$198,000Animals$158,823Education$153,025Human Services$106,345

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetACADIA FIRE FC INC: $178,500 over 8y, 27% of budgetWYOMING COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $113,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetMOUNT DESERT NURSING ASSOC: $93,750 over 8y, 3.1% of budgetTHE PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL: $75,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetOAK SPRING GARDEN FOUNDATION: $70,000 over 7y, 0.3% of budgetTHE BLUE RIDGE SCHOOL INC: $64,500 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetBLUE RIDGE WILDLIFE CENTER: $60,000 over 3y, 3.0% of budgetFoxcroft School: $55,000 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SEEING EYE INC: $55,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetHIMALAYA CURRENTS INC: $51,000 over 3y, 28% of budgetSEASIDE SEABIRD SANCTUARY: $50,000 over 5y, 2.8% of budgetMOC BEAGLES INC: $45,000 over 3y, 22% of budgetST MARYS HEALTH WAGON INC: $45,000 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetTHE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA INC: $45,000 over 8y, 0.2% of budgetGOOSE CREEK ASSOCIATION: $40,000 over 8y, 9.8% of budgetSHENANDOAH NATIONAL PARK TRUST: $35,000 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetFriends of Acadia: $31,535 over 6y, 0.1% of budgetHOLDERNESS SCHOOL: $30,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetRED PANDA NETWORK: $27,500 over 3y, 1.4% of budgetPIEDMONT CHILD CARE CENTER INC: $25,000 over 5y, 0.9% of budgetTHE NATURE CONSERVANCY: $25,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetACADIA WILDLIFE FOUNDATION: $21,823 over 8y, 5.4% of budgetCHAPEL & YORK US FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE HURRICANE ISLAND FOUNDATION: $19,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION: $17,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetELEVATE NEPAL INC: $16,500 over 2y, 5.1% of budgetSOUTHWEST HARBOR PUBLIC LIBRARY: $12,750 over 7y, 0.4% of budgetSave The Children Federation Inc: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEASTERN MINNESOTANS FOR WILDERNESS: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetSOUTHERN ENVIRONMENTAL LAW CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMYRIAD USA INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $10,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetOCEANA INC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLoudoun Wildlife Conservancy: $9,000 over 3y, 1.3% of budgetISLAND HOUSING TRUST: $8,500 over 4y, 0.2% of budgetOCEAN CONSERVANCY: $7,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetA PLACE TO BE: $7,500 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetBETTERALIFE INC: $6,710 over 2y, 2.4% of budgetSeven Loaves Services Inc: $6,272 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetBAR HARBOR FOOD PANTRY: $6,263 over 5y, 0.6% of budgetBLUE RIDGE HOSPICE INC: $5,963 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSOMESVILLE LANDING CORPORATION: $5,500 over 2y, 5.3% of budgetMOUNT DESERT ISLAND HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $5,500 over 4y, 0.6% of budgetALEXS LEMONADE STAND FOUNDATION: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSOUTHERN POVERTY LAW CENTER INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD WILDLIFE FUND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCatawba Lands Conservancy: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds ACADIA FIRE FC INC ↗
  • Who funds WYOMING COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds MOUNT DESERT NURSING ASSOC ↗
  • Who funds THE PIEDMONT ENVIRONMENTAL COUNCIL ↗
  • Who funds OAK SPRING GARDEN FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE BLUE RIDGE SCHOOL INC ↗
  • Who funds BLUE RIDGE WILDLIFE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds Foxcroft School ↗
  • Who funds THE SEEING EYE INC ↗
  • Who funds HIMALAYA CURRENTS INC ↗
  • Who funds SEASIDE SEABIRD SANCTUARY ↗
  • Who funds MOC BEAGLES INC ↗
  • Who funds ST MARYS HEALTH WAGON INC ↗
  • Who funds THE DAVID SHELDRICK WILDLIFE TRUST USA INC ↗
  • Who funds GOOSE CREEK ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds SHENANDOAH NATIONAL PARK TRUST ↗
  • Who funds Friends of Acadia ↗
  • Who funds HOLDERNESS SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds RED PANDA NETWORK ↗
  • Who funds PIEDMONT CHILD CARE CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds THE NATURE CONSERVANCY ↗
  • Who funds ACADIA WILDLIFE FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds CHAPEL & YORK US FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds THE HURRICANE ISLAND FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ALZHEIMER'S DISEASE RESEARCH FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ELEVATE NEPAL INC ↗
  • Who funds SOUTHWEST HARBOR PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds Save The Children Federation Inc ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEASTERN MINNESOTANS FOR WILDERNESS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Maine Community Foundation IncME34.2× affinity18 shared granteesties to 10 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Maine Community Foundation Inc · Ethel D Colket Foundation · Colket Family Foundation · Florence V Burden Foundation · Gerrish H Milliken Foundation 009209-009 · Hattie a and Fred C Lynam Trust · The Robert P and Arlene R Kogod Family Foundation · Cornelia Cogswell Rossi Foundation Inc · The Luminescence Foundation Inc · The Van Metre Family Foundation Inc · Alexander Brady Foundation · Janet Stone Jones Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Medway Charitable Trust funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Medway Charitable Trust. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 60%2%8%17%30%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →median 14%
  • Save the Children Federation Inc: 30% of income from government
  • First Fruits Farm Inc: 26% of income from government
  • Harford Family House Inc: 14% of income from government
  • Three Sisters Garden Project Inc: 2% of income from government
  • National Aquarium Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Seaside Seabird Sanctuary: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
6get no government money at all
17report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 135 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Medway’s filings →

More from the funding graph