Skip to content

· Private foundation

The McShane Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$50k
Granted FY2025still arriving
15
Grants FY2025still arriving
7
States reached
$23k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2023 to 2025.

Youth Development$80kHuman Services$38kHealth$17kReligion$12kEducation$9kFood & Nutrition$4k
02FY2025 · 15 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k14 grants · $28k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $23k
$2,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$2.7M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BEATING THE ODDS FOUNDATION$22,500
Individual grant recipient$5,000
THIRD STREET ALLIANCE FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN$3,000
WINDWOOD FARM HOME FOR CHILDREN INC$2,500
SECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY$2,000
SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND$2,000
THE 1162 FOUNDATION$2,000
DR GARY BURNSTEIN COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC$2,000
WISE READERS TO LEADERS$2,000
ST JOHN'S EPISCOPAL CHURCH$1,500
ST JOHN'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL$1,500
CHILD MIND INSTITUTE INC$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
BOYS AND GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL ORANGE COAST$1,000
SHARE OURSELVES$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–25, $10k) land where the poverty rate runs at 10%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 60% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%THIRD STREET ALLIANCE FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN: $3k → 11%THE 1162 FOUNDATION: $2k → 9%THE 1162 FOUNDATION: $2k → 9%SHARE OURSELVES: $2k → 10%SHARE OURSELVES: $1k → 10%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MI
NY
PA
CT
CA
UT
SC
GA
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 18% of The McShane Foundation’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address.

The McShane Foundationlessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$150k · 13 repeat orgs$8k to everyone else

13 repeat relationships: 13 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

13
2

Total granted

$150k
$4k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+14%
+35%

Still filing today

77%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 91% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’23’24’25
HealthYouth DevelopmentHuman ServicesFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TB
    THE BEATING THE ODDS FOUNDATION
    3× · 2023–2025 · $73k · revenue +25%
  • WF
    Windwood Farm Home For Children Inc
    3× · 2023–2025 · $9k · revenue +29%
  • SF
    SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND
    3× · 2023–2025 · $8k · revenue +14%

Funded once

  • SJ
    ST JOHN CHRYSOSTOM EPISCOPAL SCHOOL
    one grant, 2023 · $3k
  • BG
    BOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICAgraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $500 · revenue +35%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boys and Girls Club of Santa Monica Inc

To inspire and enable all young people, especially those who need us most, to reach their full potential as caring, responsible, productive citizens.

Youth Development
2
Shield of Faith Missions

Sof is called to empower warriors to find purpose, be resilient, and live well. we develop and provide customized treatment plans for veterans through our national network of partners.

Religion
3
South Central Family Health Center

To improve the quality of life for the diverse communities we serve providing affordable and comprehensive healthcare and education in a welcoming multi-cultural environment.

Health
4
Sacramento Children's Home

At the sacramento children's home, we are committed to opening doors to the future by maximizing the potential of children and families.

Human Services
5
New Alternatives Inc

New alternatives, inc. is committed to providing abused and negelected youth with hope and opportunities through a comprehensive array of social, residential and mental health services that we provide in san diego and orange county.

—
6
Jewish Family and Children's Service of Minneapolis

Jewish family and children's service of minneapolis provides essential services to people of all ages and backgrounds to sustain healthy relationships, ease suffering and offer support in times of need.

Human Services
7
South Coast Children's Society Inc

Providing care, counsel, and coaching for children, teens, adults - and their families.

Unclassified
8
Community Medical Centers Inc

The organization provides primary medical, behavior health, and dental care to the population of san joaquin, and solano counties without regard to patients' ability to pay.

Health
9
For the Children

To transform lives and communities by providing an array of programs, all directed toward changing the lives of children in the foster care system aimed to prevent academic failure, drug abuse, teen pregnancy, sex trafficking,…

Recreation & Sports
10
The Arnold Gold Foundation

The gold foundation champions humanism in healthcare, which we define as clinically excellent care that is kind, safe, and trustworthy. this gold standard of care embraces all and targets barriers to such care. we empower experts,…

—
11
San Fernando Community Hospital

Provides primary care, oral health, and behavioral health care, including health education to the community without regard to the ability to pay for services.

Health
12
Southern California Medical Center Inc

To deliver the highest quality of health care with the focus on the underserved and low income population of el monte, pico rivera, pomona, van nuys, woodland hills and long beach ca. the goal is to create healthy and happy families by…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Share Our Selves Corporation; the most unlike its peers is Dr Gary Burnstein Community Health Clinic. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 17 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
7/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE BEATING THE ODDS FOUNDATION: $72,500 · Youth DevelopmentTHE BEATING THE ODDS FOUNDATIONWISE READERS TO LEADERS: $4,000 · Youth Development+1 more: $500 · Youth DevelopmentIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST JOHNS EPISCOPAL CHURCH: $11,500 · OtherST JOHNS EPISCOPAL CHURCHBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL ORANGE COAST: $3,500 · OtherBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL …ST JOHN CHRYSOSTOM EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $3,000 · OtherST JOHN CHRYSOSTOM EPISCOPAL S…Individual grant recipient: $3,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientST JOHN'S EPISCOPAL SCHOOL: $1,500 · OtherWindwood Farm Home For Children Inc: $8,500 · HealthWindwood Farm Hom…SEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $8,000 · HealthSEMPER FI & AMERI…CHILD MIND INSTITUTE INC: $4,000 · HealthCHILD MIND INSTIT…DR GARY BURNSTEIN COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC: $4,000 · HealthDR GARY BURNSTEIN…THE 1162 FOUNDATION: $4,000 · Human ServicesTHIRD STREET ALLIANCE FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN: $3,000 · Human ServicesShare Our Selves Corporation: $3,000 · Human ServicesSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY INC: $4,000 · Food & Nutrition
Youth Development$77,000Other$42,500Health$24,500Human Services$10,000Food & Nutrition$4,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTHE BEATING THE ODDS FOUNDATION: $72,500 over 3y, 14% of budgetWindwood Farm Home For Children Inc: $8,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSEMPER FI & AMERICA'S FUND: $8,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCHILD MIND INSTITUTE INC: $4,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetTHE 1162 FOUNDATION: $4,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetWISE READERS TO LEADERS: $4,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetSECOND HARVEST FOOD BANK OF ORANGE COUNTY INC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetDR GARY BURNSTEIN COMMUNITY HEALTH CLINIC: $4,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF CENTRAL ORANGE COAST: $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHIRD STREET ALLIANCE FOR WOMEN AND CHILDREN: $3,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetShare Our Selves Corporation: $3,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUBS OF AMERICA: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Endowment FoundationOH8.9× affinity4 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Endowment Foundation · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The McShane Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The McShane Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%4%8%15%funder's share of their income ↑0%10%20%30%40%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–40%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The McShane Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The McShane Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 17 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on McShane’s filings →

    More from the funding graph