Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The McGee Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$539k
Granted FY2024still arriving
7
Grants FY2024still arriving
1
States reached
$160k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172024.

Education$1.7MPhilanthropy$855kCommunity Improvement$360kHealth$227kArts & Culture$168kHuman Services$115k
02FY2024 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k1 grant · $3k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
  • $50k–250k5 grants · $526k
$100,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$17M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
Individual grant recipient$160,000
SOUTHERN WV COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION$100,000
BLUEFIELD STATE UNIVERSITY$100,000
GLENVILLE STATE UNIVERSITY$100,000
WEST VIRGINIA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION$66,203
KANAWHA VALLEY COUNCIL ON PHILANTHROPY$10,000
PHILANTHROPY WEST VIRGINIA$2,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY19–21, $115k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 12%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 12%SHOES THAT FIT: $60k → 14%SHOES THAT FIT: $30k → 14%SHOES THAT FIT: $25k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

73%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$2.0M · 8 repeat orgs$721k to everyone else

8 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2024, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

8
10

Total granted

$2.0M
$558k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+124%
+126%

Still filing today

50%
20%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 70% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $163k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthPhilanthropyHuman ServicesOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • WV
    WEST VIRGINIA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2020–2024 · $374k · revenue +137%
  • TU
    THE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INC
    3× · 2017–2019 · $125k · revenue +13%
  • ST
    SHOES THAT FIT
    3× · 2019–2021 · $115k · revenue +124%

Funded once

  • CM
    CHARLESTON MAIN STREETS INC
    one grant, 2021 · $170k · revenue +20% · 82% of their budget
  • WV
    WEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2019 · $158k
  • BS
    BLUEFIELD STATE COLLEGE
    one grant, 2020 · $100k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
West Virginia State University Research & Development Corporation

To foster, support, and assist in any research and economic development activities consistent with the educational objectives and mission of west virginia state university.

2
West Virginia Chamber of Commerce

The west virginia chamber of commerce provides opportunities for broad based prosperity throughout west virginia.

3
Vcu Investment Management Company

To provide investment and investment management and related services to the rector and the board of visitors of virginia commonwealth university (vcu), and/or to the private and independent foundations and other entities affiliated with…

Education
4
Waynesburg University

Waynesburg university educates students to make connections between faith, learning and serving so they might faithfully transofrm their communiities and the world. see continuation on schedule o.as a christian comprehensive university, we…

Education
5
University of Virginia Foundation

To provide administrative services to university of virginia (university) entities, university associated organizations, or other entities involved in activities which support the university. to engage in matters pertaining to real…

Education
6
West Virginia University Foundation Inc

The mission of the WVU Foundation is to enrich the lives of those touched by West Virginia University by maximizing charitable support and providing services to the University, its students and affiliated organizations.

Education
7
Virginia Commonwealth University Intellectual Property Foundation

The foundation determines the patentability and obtains patents on virginia commonwealth university (vcu) inventions and markets and licenses such inventions to commerical entities. the foundation's activities promote research efforts at…

Health
8
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
9
Virginia Center for Inclusive Communities

VCIC works with schools, businesses, and communities to achieve success through inclusion.

Civil Rights
10
Washington University of Virginia

Provides seminary, under-graduate, graduate, doctoral, and other continuing education programs

11
West Virginia Independent Colleges and Universities Inc

The mission of wvicu is to advance collectively the interests of west virginia's independent colleges and universities and their students.

Education
12
Virginia Tech Applied Research Corporation

The mission of vt-arc is to extend the impact of the virginia tech research and innovation enterprise, delivering superior analytic and technology solutions to government and non-government customers.

Science & Tech

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is West Virginia State University Foundation Inc and the most unlike its peers is Childhood Language Disorders Center Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
6/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

GLENVILLE STATE UNIVERSITY — $400,000 · OtherGLENVILLE STATE UNIVERSITYBLUEFIELD STATE UNIVERSITY — $400,000 · OtherBLUEFIELD STATE UNIVERSITYSOUTHERN WV COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATION — $300,000 · OtherSOUTHERN WV COMMUNITY COLLEGE FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient — $160,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITY — $158,118 · OtherWEST VIRGINIA UNIVERSITYBLUEFIELD STATE COLLEGE — $100,000 · OtherBLUEFIELD STATE COLLEGE+7 more — $149,675 · Other+7 moreTHE GREATER KANAWHA VALLEY FOUNDATION — $795,000 · PhilanthropyTHE GREATER KANAWHA VALLEY…+1 more — $2,500 · PhilanthropyWEST VIRGINIA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $373,557 · EducationWEST VIRGINIA STATE U…CHARLESTON MAIN STREETS INC — $170,245 · EducationCHARLESTON MAIN STREE…THE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INC — $125,000 · EducationTHE UNIVERSITY OF CHA…CHILDHOOD LANGUAGE DISORDERS CENTER INC — $212,416 · HealthCAMC FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 · HealthSHOES THAT FIT — $115,000 · Human Services
Other$1,667,793Philanthropy$797,500Education$668,802Health$222,416Human Services$115,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE GREATER KANAWHA VALLEY FOUNDATION — $795,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetWEST VIRGINIA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC — $373,557 over 5y, 2.4% of budgetCHILDHOOD LANGUAGE DISORDERS CENTER INC — $212,416 over 3y, 20% of budgetCHARLESTON MAIN STREETS INC — $170,245 over 1y, 82% of budgetTHE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INC — $125,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSHOES THAT FIT — $115,000 over 3y, 0.7% of budgetCAMC FOUNDATION INC — $10,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetPHILANTHROPY WEST VIRGINIA INC — $2,500 over 1y, 0.9% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds THE GREATER KANAWHA VALLEY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds WEST VIRGINIA STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds CHILDHOOD LANGUAGE DISORDERS CENTER INC
  • Who funds CHARLESTON MAIN STREETS INC
  • Who funds THE UNIVERSITY OF CHARLESTON INC
  • Who funds SHOES THAT FIT
  • Who funds CAMC FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds PHILANTHROPY WEST VIRGINIA INC

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Encova Foundation of West VirginiaWV20× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Encova Foundation of West Virginia · Truist West Virginia Foundation Inc · Charles & Mary Fayne Glotfelty Foundation Inc · The Greater Kanawha Valley Foundation · Herscher Foundation Inc · The Martha Gaines & Russell Wehrle Memorial Foundation · Tgkvf Inc · Bernard McDonough Foundation Inc · Claude Worthington Benedum Foundation · American Endowment Foundation · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The McGee Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%6%23%51%90%your share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
    typical government reliance, FY2025

    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The McGee Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The McGee Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

    Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    More from the funding graph