· Private foundation
The McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter Charitable Foundation Inc
Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2022.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2022
- Under $10k2 grants · $2k
- $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| FOUNDATION FOR MORRISTOWN MEDICAL CENTER | $12,500 |
| VIRTUA HEALTH FOUNDATION | $1,000 |
| TRINITY ACADEMY | $500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–18, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +45% since the first grant, against +13% for the ones you funded once.
4 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2022, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- FFFoundation for Morristown Medical Center4× · 2019–2022 · $50k · revenue +45%
MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER2× · 2017–2018 · $3k · revenue +121%- LALegal Aid Foundation of Colorado2× · 2017–2018 · $1k · revenue +23%
Funded once
- ANAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branchesgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $826 · revenue +46%
- AFALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATIONone grant, 2018 · $780
- GPGRACIE'S PROMISEone grant, 2017 · $780 · revenue -44%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Improve the lives of people with cancer and their families through advocacy, research, and patient support, to ensure everyone has an opportunity to prevent, detect, treat, and survive cancer.
Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…
Our mission: drive research, expand knowledge, and advance care for the nf community. our vision: end nf.
The foundation is set up to deliver one program - look good feel better. the mission of this nationwide program is to improve the quality of life of women, men, and teens undergoing cancer treatment by offering advice on how to cope with…
To support cancer research and public education relating to prevention, earlier diagnosis, better treatments and ultimately, a cure for cancer.
The mission of children's cancer cause is to champion policies and programs that improve the lives of children with cancer and survivors.
To provide funds to benefit families affected by cancer and to support cancer research and education.
To help conquer cancer and other diseases through the application of biostatistical principles and innovative data management methods.
Cancer research and treatment fund,inc.(cr&t) funds research emphasizing the cause,prevention,treatment,and cure of myeloproliferative neoplasms(mpns)and alsofunds other blood and solid tumor cancer research.
To define and advance quality, effective, equitable, and accessible cancer care and prevention so all people can live better lives.
The mission of the acr foundation is to advance the profession and practice of radiology to benefit patients with a specific emphasis on health policy research.
To aid the alliance for clinical trials in oncology national clinical trials cooperative group and support the clinical trials and laboratory research of the alliance, as well as efforts to educate the medical community on methods of…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Support Center for Child Advocates and the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds Foundation for Morristown Medical Center ↗
- Who funds MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER ↗
- Who funds POLICE UNITY TOUR INC ↗
- Who funds Legal Aid Foundation of Colorado ↗
- Who funds VIRTUA HEALTH FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
- Who funds GRACIE'S PROMISE ↗
- Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗
- Who funds ALVIN R LEONARD FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PARTNERS FOR WOMEN AND JUSTICE INC ↗
- Who funds American Diabetes Association ↗
- Who funds NJSPCA INC ↗
- Who funds Rotarys Camp Florida Inc ↗
- Who funds Camp Rising Sun Charitable Foundation Inc ↗
- Who funds LD RESOURCES FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE V FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS DELAWARE INC ↗
- Who funds CHRISTOPHER REEVE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds BEAT CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR FACIAL RECONSTRUCTION INC ↗
- Who funds COURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF MORRIS AND SUSSEX COUNTIES INC ↗
- Who funds HALOS FOR ANGELS ↗
- Who funds SINGING CITY INC ↗
- Who funds CHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF PITTSBURGH ↗
- Who funds COVENANT TO CARE FOR CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds MORNINGSTAR SENIOR LIVING INC ↗
- Who funds AMY'S ANGELS CORPORATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Blue Foundry Charitable Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Verizon Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter Charitable Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Christopher Reeve Foundation — 49% of income from government
- Covenant to Care for Children Inc — 35% of income from government
- Partners for Women and Justice Inc — 26% of income from government
- Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc — 4% of income from government
- Special Olympics Delaware Inc — 3% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter Charitable Foundation Inc?
Find your warmest path to The McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.