Skip to content
The McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter Charitable Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter Charitable Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$14k
Granted FY2022
3
Grants FY2022
1
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2022.

Health$59kHuman Services$2kPublic Safety & Disaster$2kCrime & Legal$2kRecreation & Sports$2kEducation$1kAnimals$1kFood & Nutrition$753Other$0
02FY2022 · 3 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2022

  • Under $10k2 grants · $2k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $13k
$1,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOUNDATION FOR MORRISTOWN MEDICAL CENTER$12,500
VIRTUA HEALTH FOUNDATION$1,000
TRINITY ACADEMY$500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–18, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 76% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%MORNING STAR SENIOR LIVING: $150 → 11%GRACIE'S PROMISE: $780 → 15%COVENANT TO CARE FOR CHILDREN: $250 → 11%HALOS FOR ANGELS INC: $375 → 4%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
WY
IA
PA
NJ
CT
CO
VA
DE
NC
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$56k · 4 repeat orgs$18k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +45% since the first grant, against +13% for those funded once.

4 repeat relationships: 1 still active in FY2022, 3 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2022 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

4
39

Total granted

$56k
$17k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+45%
+13%

Still filing today

100%
59%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2022, 89% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $2k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22
HealthHuman ServicesCrime & LegalAnimalsYouth DevelopmentCivil RightsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FF
    Foundation for Morristown Medical Center
    4× · 2019–2022 · $50k · revenue +45%
  • MEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER
    2× · 2017–2018 · $3k · revenue +121%
  • LA
    Legal Aid Foundation of Colorado
    2× · 2017–2018 · $1k · revenue +23%

Funded once

  • AN
    American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branchesgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $826 · revenue +46%
  • AF
    ALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $780
  • GP
    GRACIE'S PROMISE
    one grant, 2017 · $780 · revenue -44%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
American Cancer Society Inc

Improve the lives of people with cancer and their families through advocacy, research, and patient support, to ensure everyone has an opportunity to prevent, detect, treat, and survive cancer.

Health
2
Curesearch for Children's Cancer

Curesearch's mission is to fund & support targeted & innovative cancer research with measurable results, & to be the authoritative source of information & resources for all those affected by children's cancer. see schedule o for…

Health
3
Children's Tumor Foundation

Our mission: drive research, expand knowledge, and advance care for the nf community. our vision: end nf.

Health
4
Personal Care Products Council Foundation Inc

The foundation is set up to deliver one program - look good feel better. the mission of this nationwide program is to improve the quality of life of women, men, and teens undergoing cancer treatment by offering advice on how to cope with…

Health
5
National Foundation for Cancer Research

To support cancer research and public education relating to prevention, earlier diagnosis, better treatments and ultimately, a cure for cancer.

Health
6
The Children's Cancer Cause Inc

The mission of children's cancer cause is to champion policies and programs that improve the lives of children with cancer and survivors.

Health
7
Connecticut Cancer Foundation Inc

To provide funds to benefit families affected by cancer and to support cancer research and education.

—
8
Cancer Research and Biostatistics

To help conquer cancer and other diseases through the application of biostatistical principles and innovative data management methods.

Health
9
Cancer Research and Treatment Fund Inc

Cancer research and treatment fund,inc.(cr&t) funds research emphasizing the cause,prevention,treatment,and cure of myeloproliferative neoplasms(mpns)and alsofunds other blood and solid tumor cancer research.

—
10
National Comprehensive Cancer Network

To define and advance quality, effective, equitable, and accessible cancer care and prevention so all people can live better lives.

Health
11
American College of Radiology Foundation

The mission of the acr foundation is to advance the profession and practice of radiology to benefit patients with a specific emphasis on health policy research.

Philanthropy
12
Alliance for Clinical Trials in Oncology Foundation

To aid the alliance for clinical trials in oncology national clinical trials cooperative group and support the clinical trials and laboratory research of the alliance, as well as efforts to educate the medical community on methods of…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Support Center for Child Advocates; the most unlike its peers is American Diabetes Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

29 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 29 of the 45 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
28/29
Grantees still filing
15/29
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Foundation for Morristown Medical Center: $50,000 · HealthFoundation for Morristown Medical CenterMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $3,386 · HealthMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER+7 more: $4,170 · Health+7 moreALZHEIMER'S FOUNDATION: $780 · OtherALZHEIMER'S F…ST JOHN'S FEED THE HUNGRY: $653 · OtherST JOHN'S FEE…NATIONAL MS SOCIETY: $610 · OtherNATIONAL MS S…PWSA: $605 · OtherPWSAINTERFAITH CAREGIVERS: $600 · OtherINTERFAITH CA…Individual grant recipient: $570 · OtherIndividual gr…TREA CHAPTER 3: $545 · OtherTREA CHAPTER …Individual grant recipient: $510 · OtherIndividual gr…TRINITY ACADEMY: $500 · OtherTRINITY ACADE…SPECIAL OLYMPICS DELAWARE INC: $495 · OtherSPECIAL OLYMP…NATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR FACIAL RECONSTRUCTION INC: $410 · OtherSINGING CITY INC: $365 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $300 · OtherCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF MORRIS AND SUSSEX COUNTIES INC: $380 · Other+9 more: $1,350 · Other+9 morePOLICE UNITY TOUR INC: $1,290 · Crime & LegalLegal Aid Foundation of Colorado: $1,000 · Crime & LegalPARTNERS FOR WOMEN AND JUSTICE INC: $620 · Crime & Legal+1 more: $95 · Crime & LegalAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $826 · Human ServicesGRACIE'S PROMISE: $780 · Human ServicesHALOS FOR ANGELS: $375 · Human ServicesCOVENANT TO CARE FOR CHILDREN INC: $250 · Human ServicesMORNINGSTAR SENIOR LIVING INC: $150 · Human ServicesTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $696 · AnimalsNJSPCA INC: $590 · AnimalsRotarys Camp Florida Inc: $564 · Youth DevelopmentCamp Rising Sun Charitable Foundation Inc: $545 · Philanthropy
Health$57,556Other$8,673Crime & Legal$3,005Human Services$2,381Animals$1,286Youth Development$564Philanthropy$545

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFoundation for Morristown Medical Center: $50,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetMEMORIAL SLOAN-KETTERING CANCER CENTER: $3,386 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPOLICE UNITY TOUR INC: $1,290 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetLegal Aid Foundation of Colorado: $1,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetVIRTUA HEALTH FOUNDATION INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $826 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $696 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPARTNERS FOR WOMEN AND JUSTICE INC: $620 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCamp Rising Sun Charitable Foundation Inc: $545 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetLD RESOURCES FOUNDATION INC: $515 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetTHE V FOUNDATION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS DELAWARE INC: $495 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHRISTOPHER REEVE FOUNDATION: $465 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBEAT CHILDHOOD CANCER FOUNDATION INC: $430 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNATIONAL FOUNDATION FOR FACIAL RECONSTRUCTION INC: $410 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOURT APPOINTED SPECIAL ADVOCATES OF MORRIS AND SUSSEX COUNTIES INC: $380 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHALOS FOR ANGELS: $375 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetSINGING CITY INC: $365 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetCOVENANT TO CARE FOR CHILDREN INC: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S MUSEUM OF PITTSBURGH: $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMY'S ANGELS CORPORATION: $150 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetMORNINGSTAR SENIOR LIVING INC: $150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetNANTUCKET CONSERVATION FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Blue Foundry Charitab…The Bank of America C…Verizon FoundationThe Pfizer Foundation…Network for GoodJpmorgan Chase Founda…Charities Aid Foundat…American Online Givin…Paypal Charitable Giv…Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …
Blue Foundry Charitable Foundation IncNJ13.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Blue Foundry Charitable Foundation Inc · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Verizon Foundation · The Pfizer Foundation Inc · Network for Good · Jpmorgan Chase Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter Charitable Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter Charitable Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 90%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%23%45%68%90%share of the org’s income from government →median 26%
  • Christopher Reeve Foundation: 49% of income from government
  • Covenant to Care for Children Inc: 35% of income from government
  • Partners for Women and Justice Inc: 26% of income from government
  • Nantucket Conservation Foundation Inc: 4% of income from government
  • Special Olympics Delaware Inc: 3% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
9get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–90%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter Charitable Foundation Inc?

Find your warmest path to The McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter Charitable Foundation Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 45 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2022, released 2022. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Possibly out of date. A more recent filing (FY2024) is on record and reports no grant expense, so the figures above are from FY2022, the most recent year this funder made grants.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on McElroy Deutsch Mulvaney & Carpenter’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home