Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The McCurdy Family Foundation

Its FY2020 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$55k
Granted FY2020
12
Grants FY2020
7
States reached
$13k
Largest
01What you fund
0178% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172020.

Education$69kArts & Culture$42kEnvironment$14kInternational$8kPublic Benefit$6kCivil Rights$5kScience & Tech$4kHousing & Shelter$3kOther$0
02FY2020 · 12 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2020

  • Under $10k10 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $23k
$5,000
Median grant
7
States reached
$2.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
NEW COVENANT SCHOOLS$12,500
MYSTIC SEAPORT MUSEUM$10,000
COALITION FOR RAINFOREST NATIONS$6,250
CLEAN AIR TASK FORCE$6,250
EAST WOODS SCHOOL ASSOC$5,000
SMITHFIELD PRESTON FDN$5,000
RHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN$4,500
WHALING MUSEUM SOCIETY$2,000
ROZALIA PROJECT$1,000
HANDS ACROSS THE SEA$1,000
BONNELL COVE FOUNDATION$500
Individual grant recipient$500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY18–18, $3k) land where the poverty rate runs at 20%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%WOMEN IN NEED INC: $3k → 20%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

VT
NY
MA
PA
CT
RI
CA
VA
NM
NC

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

49%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$88k · 10 repeat orgs$91k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 5 still active in FY2020, 5 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2020 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
15

Total granted

$88k
$53k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+38%
+58%

Still filing today

60%
33%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 30% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $38k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
EducationArts & CultureEnvironmentInternationalHealthCivil RightsOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • MYSTIC SEAPORT MUSEUM INC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $25k · revenue +31%
  • RHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN
    3× · 2018–2020 · $13k · revenue +11%
  • EW
    EAST WOODS SCHOOL INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $9k · revenue +38%

Funded once

  • HR
    HUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC
    one grant, 2019 · $6k · revenue -1%
  • FH
    FREEDOM HOUSE
    one grant, 2019 · $6k
  • THE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INCgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $5k · revenue +58%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

2
World Resources Institute

Wri is committed to creating change that improves people's lives and ensures the natural world can thrive. (see schedule o)wri's bold vision requires a formula for success we call "count it. change it. scale it.":- count it: our work is…

International
3
Rainforest Trust

Rainforest trust saves endangered wildlife and protects our planet by creating rainforest reserves through partnerships, community engagement, and donor support.

International
4
Aquarium of the Pacific Corporation

The aquarium of the pacific's mission is to instill a sense of wonder, respect, and stewardship for the pacific ocean, its inhabitants, and ecosystems.

Animals
5
The Water Research Foundation

The purpose of the water research foundation (wrf) is a definitive research organization to advance the science of all things water to better meet the evolving needs of its subscribers and the water sector. to engage exclusively in…

Environment
6
Sea Research Foundation Inc

To inspire people to care for and protect our ocean planet through education and research.

Animals
7
New York School of Interior Design

New york school of interior design provides the most innovative, immersive, and transformative interior design education in the world, demonstrating the impact of professionally designed interiors on the health, happiness, and well-being…

Education
8
Wildaid Inc

Wildaid's mission is to inspire change and empower the world to protect wildlife and vital habitats from critical threats.

Animals
9
Brooklyn Navy Yard Development Corp

To manage the brooklyn navy yard for the city of new york, specifically to expand job opportunities for new yorkers by fostering the development of small businesses.

Community Improvement
10
Terraset

Terraset uses philanthropic capital to purchase permanent, high-quality carbon removal. we pool donations from individuals, foundations, family offices, and donor advised funds, and make strategic purchases of high-quality carbon removal…

Environment
11
Boston Harbor Now Inc

Our mission is to ensure that the people of greater boston benefit from a vibrant, resilient, and inclusive waterfront, harbor, and islands; these spaces are equitable, accessible, and adapted to climate change; and to ensure our public,…

Environment
12
Environment Next Inc

Environment next supports individuals, nonprofits and businesses around the world on solutions to complex climate issues. we provide leadership, outreach and communication support, grants, and investments to empower leaders and their ideas…

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Human Rights Watch Inc and the most unlike its peers is Bonnell Cove Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
4
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
13/17
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

NEW COVENANT SCHOOL — $12,500 · OtherNEW COVENANT SCHOOLASEEES FOR SLAVIC EAST — $8,000 · OtherASEEES FOR SLAVIC EASTIndividual grant recipient — $8,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientIndividual grant recipient — $7,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientFREEDOM HOUSE — $5,500 · OtherFREEDOM HOUSEEAST WOODS SCHOOL ASSOC — $5,000 · OtherEAST WOODS SCHOOL ASSOCEDCI — $4,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $4,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $4,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient — $3,500 · OtherASSOC FOR WOMEN IN SLAVIC STUDIES — $3,000 · Other+6 more — $13,500 · Other+6 moreRHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN — $12,500 · EducationRHODE ISLAND SCHOOL …EAST WOODS SCHOOL INC — $9,000 · EducationEAST WOODS SCHOOL IN…KILDONAN SCHOOL — $4,750 · EducationKILDONAN SCHOOLTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $4,000 · EducationTHE TRUSTEES OF COLU…GENSPACE NYC — $3,500 · EducationGENSPACE NYCMYSTIC SEAPORT MUSEUM INC — $25,000 · Arts & CultureMYSTIC SEAPORT MUSE…Smithfield Preston Foundation — $5,000 · Arts & CultureSmithfield Preston …THE WHALING MUSEUM SOCIETY INC — $2,000 · Arts & CultureTHE WHALING MUSEUM …CLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC — $6,250 · EnvironmentCOALITION FOR RAINFOREST NATIONS SECRETARIAT — $6,250 · EnvironmentROZALIA PROJECT — $1,000 · EnvironmentHANDS ACROSS THE SEA INC — $9,500 · HealthHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC — $5,500 · InternationalDIRECT RELIEF — $2,500 · InternationalTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC — $5,000 · Civil RightsWOMEN IN NEED INC — $3,000 · Human Services
Other$78,000Education$33,750Arts & Culture$32,000Environment$13,500Health$9,500International$8,000Civil Rights$5,000Human Services$3,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetMYSTIC SEAPORT MUSEUM INC — $25,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetRHODE ISLAND SCHOOL OF DESIGN — $12,500 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetHANDS ACROSS THE SEA INC — $9,500 over 4y, 1.1% of budgetEAST WOODS SCHOOL INC — $9,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetCLEAN AIR TASK FORCE INC — $6,250 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOALITION FOR RAINFOREST NATIONS SECRETARIAT — $6,250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetHUMAN RIGHTS WATCH INC — $5,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE CENTER FOR REPRODUCTIVE RIGHTS INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetSmithfield Preston Foundation — $5,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetTHE TRUSTEES OF COLUMBIA UNIVERSITY IN THE CITY OF NEW YORK — $4,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGENSPACE NYC — $3,500 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetWOMEN IN NEED INC — $3,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBONNELL COVE FOUNDATION — $2,500 over 2y, 3.8% of budgetTHE WHALING MUSEUM SOCIETY INC — $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetROZALIA PROJECT — $1,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Donor Advised Charitable Giving IncCO4.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 2 of 2Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The McCurdy Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 5%
  • Mystic Seaport Museum Inc5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The McCurdy Family Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The McCurdy Family Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2020, released 2020. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph