Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Maurice & Marianne Johannessen Found

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$80k
Granted FY2025still arriving
30
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
0183% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Crime & Legal$92kArts & Culture$89kHuman Services$39kEducation$39kReligion$26kInternational$18kPublic Safety & Disaster$17kEmployment$16kOther$0
02FY2025 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k26 grants · $37k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $43k
$1,000
Median grant
8
States reached
$1.4M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
SC Supporters of SWAT$11,500
Turtle Bay Exploration Park$11,000
St Josephs Catholic Church$10,000
Individual grant recipient$10,000
Cal Veterans Assistance Group$5,500
Klamath Cty Sheriff's Office$5,000
St Michael the Archangel Church$5,000
PreBorn$2,000
Tunnel to Towers$2,000
Salvation Army$2,000
Foothill High School$1,800
Shield Training Center$1,500
Individual grant recipient$1,000
Communities for Police Canines$1,000
Individual grant recipient$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–25, $7k) land where the poverty rate runs at 16%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%PreBorn: $3k → 16%PreBorn: $2k → 16%PreBorn: $1k → 16%Good News Rescue Mission: $500 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
MI
NY
MA
OR
IN
CA
CO
VA
TN
NC
OK
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

81%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$334k · 26 repeat orgs$81k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships: 18 still active in FY2025, 8 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
20

Total granted

$334k
$55k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

0%
+13%

Still filing today

35%
45%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 67% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $26k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationArts & CultureAnimalsHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION
    4× · 2022–2025 · $7k · revenue +83%
  • SH
    SHASTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY
    5× · 2021–2025 · $6k · revenue +120%
  • SP
    SAMARITAN'S PURSE
    3× · 2023–2025 · $5k · revenue +53%

Funded once

  • SU
    SIMPSON UNIVERSITY
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +13%
  • AP
    Anderson Police K9 Unit
    one grant, 2020 · $10k
  • CL
    CHILDREN'S LEGACY CENTERgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $10k · revenue +239%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Foothill Dog Rescue of the Sierras

Foothill Dog Rescue is a 100% all volunteer organization dedicated to re-homing dogs from over crowded animal shelters, owner surrenders and underserved communities. We also sponsor vaccine and microchip clinics for our County and have…

Animals
2
Northern California Sled Dog Rescue

Northern California Sled Dog Rescue (NORSLED) is an all volunteer non-profit group dedicated to rescuing, rehabilitating, fostering and finding new homes for unwanted, abused and abandoned siberian huskies, alaskan malamutes, samoyeds and…

Animals
3
Redwood Coast Humane Society

Prevention of pet abuse, neglect, and over-population by providing temporary and permanent homes for abandoned cats and dogs and providing neutering and spaying services for these animals.

Animals
4
Safe Animal Shelter of Orange Park

The mission of safe animal shelter is to provide a temporary safe haven for abused, abandoned, lost and unwanted cats and dogs until adopted into a permanent home, and to advocate spay/neuter as the only means to control animal…

Animals
5
El Rancho Exilio Animal Sanctuary

The mission of the el rancho exilio animal santuary is to provide a refuge for compatible elderly dogs and cats, as well as conducting regular and free spay and neuter clinics to prevent unwanted animal pregnancies.

Animals
6
The San Francisco Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals

To ensure every companion animal has access to quality medical care, compassionate shelter, and a loving home.

Animals
7
Oregon Humane Society

The oregon humane society ("ohs") is a private animal welfare organization, founded in 1868 and incorporated in 1880, whose mission is to create a more humane society with the vision of a world where all animals are treated with…

Animals
8
Northcoast Marine Mammal Center

The northcoast marine mammal centers (nmmc) mission is to promote the long-term health of marine mammals along approximately two hundred miles of remote coastline in humboldt and del norte counties in northern california. the nmmc does…

Animals
9
Hart

Animal shelter and rescue

Animals
10
The Placer County Society for the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Spca

The mission of the placer society for the prevention of cruelty to animals (placer spca) is to enhance the lives of companion animals and support the human-animal bond.

Animals
11
Noah's Ark Animal Haven and Rescue

Our mission is to provide a safe and caring environment for all permanent or temporary animals that come through our doors. we are 100% no kill. this includes behavioral cases. we believe that every animal is perfect in the right home or…

Animals
12
Sale Ranch Sanctuary

The purpose of Sale Ranch Sanctuary is to rescue, rehabilitate and offer refuge to neglected and abused animals in the state of California.

Animals
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Thomas More Society; the most unlike its peers is National Mill Dog Rescue. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

22 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 22 of the 58 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
21/22
Grantees still filing
12/22
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

Individual grant recipient: $40,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientRedding Peace Officers Ass'n: $36,500 · OtherRedding Peace Officers Ass'nKlamath Cty Sheriff's Office: $30,000 · OtherKlamath Cty Sheriff's OfficeSC Supporters of SWAT: $16,500 · OtherSC Supporters of SWATShield Training Center: $15,800 · OtherShield Training CenterShasta County Sheriff's K-9 Unit: $15,446 · OtherShasta County Sheriff's K-9 UnitFameAfrica: $13,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $11,500 · OtherTHE SALVATION ARMY: $10,900 · OtherAnderson Police K9 Unit: $10,000 · OtherSt Josephs Catholic Church: $10,000 · Other+33 more: $77,359 · Other+33 moreTURTLE BAY EXPLORATION PARK: $77,418 · Arts & CultureTURTLE BAY EXPLORATIO…+2 more: $2,500 · Arts & CultureHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $11,000 · EducationSIMPSON UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $7,000 · EducationSHINGLETOWN LIBRARY CORP: $2,000 · Education+2 more: $2,000 · EducationCHILDREN'S LEGACY CENTER: $10,000 · Youth DevelopmentMission Pre-Born Inc: $6,000 · Human ServicesGOOD NEWS RESCUE MISSION: $500 · Human ServicesNORTH STATE CANCER LEAGUE: $5,800 · HealthSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $5,000 · Religion
Other$287,005Arts & Culture$79,918Education$32,000Youth Development$10,000Human Services$6,500Health$5,800Religion$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetTURTLE BAY EXPLORATION PARK: $77,418 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetHILLSDALE COLLEGE: $11,000 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSIMPSON UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCHILDREN'S LEGACY CENTER: $10,000 over 1y, 0.6% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMission Pre-Born Inc: $6,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHASTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY: $6,000 over 5y, 0.4% of budgetNORTH STATE CANCER LEAGUE: $5,800 over 4y, 8.7% of budgetSAMARITAN'S PURSE: $5,000 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetSHINGLETOWN LIBRARY CORP: $2,000 over 4y, 1.9% of budgetREDDING CITY BALLET: $1,500 over 2y, 2.9% of budgetRedding Chamber of Commerce: $1,045 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetHOMES FOR OUR TROOPS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFOLDS OF HONOR FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRIVERFRONT PLAYHOUSE A NONPROFIT PUBLIC BENEFIT CO: $1,000 over 1y, 0.7% of budgetNational Mill Dog Rescue: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHOMAS MORE SOCIETY: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHumanity for Horses: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOOD NEWS RESCUE MISSION: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHAVEN HUMANE SOCIETY: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds TURTLE BAY EXPLORATION PARK ↗
  • Who funds HILLSDALE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds SIMPSON UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds CHILDREN'S LEGACY CENTER ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds Mission Pre-Born Inc ↗
  • Who funds SHASTA HISTORICAL SOCIETY ↗
  • Who funds NORTH STATE CANCER LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN'S PURSE ↗
  • Who funds SHINGLETOWN LIBRARY CORP ↗
  • Who funds REDDING CITY BALLET ↗
  • Who funds Redding Chamber of Commerce ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The McConnell FoundationCA22× affinity8 shared granteesties to 6 of 6Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The McConnell Foundation · Community Foundation of the North State · Dignity Health · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Maurice & Marianne Johannessen Found funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Maurice & Marianne Johannessen Found. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 20%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    2get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Maurice & Marianne Johannessen Found?

    Find your warmest path to The Maurice & Marianne Johannessen Found through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 58 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Maurice & Marianne Johannessen Found’s filings →

    More from the funding graph