Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Maryland Branch Shut-In Society of Baltimore City Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$48k
Granted FY2025still arriving
7
Grants FY2025still arriving
2
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Health$242kFood & Nutrition$99kHuman Services$22kPhilanthropy$18kCommunity Improvement$7k
02FY2025 · 7 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $8k
  • $10k–50k4 grants · $40k
$10,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$418k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
BRIDGING LIFE$10,000
GILCHRIST SERVICES$10,000
STELLA MARIS$10,000
MOVEABLE FEAST$10,000
CCPS FOOD SERVICES$5,000
ASBURY FOUNDATION$2,000
TO AND FOR SHUT-IN PEOPLE THROUGH GUIDE POSTS$935
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 11%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $3k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $3k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $3k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $1k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $1k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $1k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $1k → 11%CATHOLIC CHARITIES: $1k → 11%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$383k · 10 repeat orgs$5k to everyone else

10 repeat relationships — 6 still active in FY2025, 4 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

10
1

Total granted

$383k
$5k

Still filing today

80%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 90% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
PhilanthropyFood & NutritionHuman ServicesHealthHousing & ShelterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    Stella Maris Inc
    9× · 2017–2025 · $90k · revenue +44%
  • MF
    MOVEABLE FEAST INC
    9× · 2017–2025 · $79k · revenue +19%
  • BRIDGINGLIFE INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $66k · revenue +88%

Funded once

  • CF
    CCPS FOOD SERVICES
    one grant, 2025 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Owings Mills Senior Housing Inc

The organization is affiliated with Associated Catholic Charities, Inc. (ACC) whose mission is "Inspired by the Gospel mandates to love, serve and teach, Catholic Charities provides care and services to improve the lives of Marylanders in…

Housing & Shelter
2
Mercy Medical Center

Like the Sisters of Mercy before us, we witness God's healing love for all people by providing excellent clinical services within a community of compassionate care. As an independent Catholic hospital, we pledge to enhance the health of…

Health
3
Glen Burnie Senior Housing Inc

The organization is affiliated with Associated Catholic Charities, Inc. (ACC) whose mission is "inspired by the Gospel mandates to love, serve, and teach, Catholic Charities provides care and services to improve the lives of Marylanders in…

Human Services
4
Bridgewater Home Inc

Assisted Living and Nursing Care

Human Services
5
Aberdeen Senior Housing Inc

The organization is affiliated with Associated Catholic Charities, Inc. (ACC) whose mission is "inspired by the Gospel mandates to love, serve, and teach, Catholic Charities provides care and services to improve the lives of Marylanders in…

Housing & Shelter
6
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

7
Bethany Community Inc

The organization is affiliated with Associated Catholic Charities, Inc. (ACC) whose mission is "Inspired by the Gospel mandates to love, serve and teach, Catholic Charities provides care and services to improve the lives of Marylanders in…

8
Mercy Ridge Inc

Mercy ridge is a continuing care retirement facility that provides 408 living apartments, 35 assisted living units and 12 dementia units.

Housing & Shelter
9
Trinity House Apartments Inc

The organization is affiliated with Associated Catholic Charities, Inc. (ACC) whose mission is "Inspired by the Gospel mandates to love, serve and teach, Catholic Charities provides care and services to improve the lives of Marylanders in…

Human Services
10
Backbone Housing Inc

The organization is affiliated with Associated Catholic Charities, Inc. (ACC) whose mission is "inspired by the Gospel mandates to love, serve, and teach, Catholic Charities provides care and services to improve the lives of Marylanders in…

Housing & Shelter
11
Broadmead Inc

To foster independence, growth and opportunities in elderhood by supporting a dynamic community, providing exceptional health services, developing collaborative relationships and upholding quaker values.

Human Services
12
Jenkins Memorial Nursing Home Inc

The organization is affiliated with Associated Catholic Charities, Inc. (ACC) whose mission is "Inspired by the Gospel mandates to love, serve and teach, Catholic Charities provides care and services to improve the lives of Marylanders in…

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Meals On Wheels of Central Marylandinc and the most unlike its peers is Govans Ecumenical Development Corp. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

8 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 8 of the 11 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
0
Early backer (in before they grew)
8/8
Grantees still filing
7/8
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

Stella Maris Inc — $90,000 · OtherStella Maris IncGILCHRIST SERVICES — $79,007 · OtherGILCHRIST SERVICESMOVEABLE FEAST INC — $79,000 · OtherMOVEABLE FEAST INCBRIDGINGLIFE INC — $66,000 · OtherBRIDGINGLIFE INC+2 more — $13,255 · OtherASBURY FOUNDATION INC — $18,000 · PhilanthropyMEALS ON WHEELS OF CENTRAL MARYLANDINC — $15,000 · Food & NutritionASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC — $14,000 · Human ServicesKESWICK COMMUNITY HEALTH INC — $7,000 · HealthGOVANS ECUMENICAL DEVELOPMENT CORP — $7,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$327,262Philanthropy$18,000Food & Nutrition$15,000Human Services$14,000Health$7,000Housing & Shelter$7,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetStella Maris Inc — $90,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMOVEABLE FEAST INC — $79,000 over 9y, 0.2% of budgetBRIDGINGLIFE INC — $66,000 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetASBURY FOUNDATION INC — $18,000 over 9y, 0.0% of budgetMEALS ON WHEELS OF CENTRAL MARYLANDINC — $15,000 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC — $14,000 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetKESWICK COMMUNITY HEALTH INC — $7,000 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetGOVANS ECUMENICAL DEVELOPMENT CORP — $7,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds Stella Maris Inc
  • Who funds MOVEABLE FEAST INC
  • Who funds BRIDGINGLIFE INC
  • Who funds ASBURY FOUNDATION INC
  • Who funds MEALS ON WHEELS OF CENTRAL MARYLANDINC
  • Who funds ASSOCIATED CATHOLIC CHARITIES INC
  • Who funds KESWICK COMMUNITY HEALTH INC
  • Who funds GOVANS ECUMENICAL DEVELOPMENT CORP

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving IncMD13× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: T Rowe Price Program for Charitable Giving Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Maryland Branch Shut-In Society of Baltimore City Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%8%15%22%30%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 18%
  • Govans Ecumenical Development Corp28% of income from government
  • Moveable Feast Inc18% of income from government
  • Associated Catholic Charities Inc10% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–30%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 11 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph