Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Mary Louise Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$169k
Granted FY2025still arriving
46
Grants FY2025still arriving
19
States reached
$107k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Human Services$667kReligion$278kInternational$153kHealth$84kEducation$55kHousing & Shelter$34kPublic Safety & Disaster$27kFood & Nutrition$26kOther$0
02FY2025 · 46 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k45 grants · $62k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $107k
$1,000
Median grant
19
States reached
$3.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FIDELITY ADVISED FUND$106,982
WORLD VISION$2,000
PRIESTS FOR LIFE$2,000
CHRISTIAN APPLACHIAN PROJECT$2,000
ST AUGUSTINE INDIAN MISSION$2,000
CATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION$2,000
SMILE TRAIN$2,000
BENEDICTINE HOUSE$2,000
SHRINERS HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN$2,000
ST JUDES CHILDRENS HOSPITAL$2,000
MARYKNOLL SISTERS$2,000
FEED THE CHILDREN$2,000
SALESIAN MISSION$2,000
FATHER NADONLY GOOD NEWS FUND$2,000
MOSAIC$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY19–25, $14k) land where the poverty rate runs at 22%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%COVENANT HOUSE: $3k → 17%CHRISTIAN APPLACHIAN PROJECT: $3k → 26%COVENANT HOUSE: $1k → 17%CHRISTIAN APPLACHIAN PROJECT: $2k → 26%CHRISTIAN APPLACHIAN PROJECT: $2k → 26%CHRISTIAN APPLACHIAN PROJECT: $1k → 26%MIDWEST YOU CAN FUND: $1k → 12%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
MT
WI
MI
NY
MA
SD
IA
CT
NE
MO
KY
VA
MD
TN
DC
OK
AL
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
04

Where the work is directed

The same grants placed two ways: where each recipient sits, and where its stated purpose sends the money.

About 42% of The Mary Louise Foundation Inc’s grant dollars are earmarked for a different county than the recipient’s own address. By recipient address, 15% of the giving stays in NE; by stated purpose, 4%.

The Mary Louise Foundation Inclessmore of its giving
Placed by recipient address
How this is measured
Recipient view: each grant at its grantee’s ZIP, mapped to a county. Directed view: each grant at the county its stated purpose names, falling back to the recipient’s county when the purpose names no place; US grants only. A county shows only if it carries the top 95% of that view’s dollars. Purposes are read from the funder’s own 990 grant descriptions.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

97%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.3M · 51 repeat orgs$41k to everyone else

51 repeat relationships: 44 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

51
52

Total granted

$1.3M
$40k

Still filing today

33%
0%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 99% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $1k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
InternationalHuman ServicesHousing & ShelterHealthYouth DevelopmentReligionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FT
    FEED THE CHILDREN INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $25k · revenue +34%
  • M
    MOSAIC
    8× · 2017–2025 · $18k · revenue +73%
  • SMILE TRAIN INC
    7× · 2019–2025 · $17k · revenue +26%

Funded once

  • SM
    SALESIAN MISSIONS INC
    one grant, 2020 · $12k
  • SJ
    ST JOSEPH INDIAN ACH
    one grant, 2019 · $10k
  • GN
    GOOD NEWS FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2017 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Medical Teams International

Medical teams international is a christian humanitarian relief agency focused on providing life-saving medical care for people in crisis.

International
2
Global Partners in Care

The organization's mission is to build partnerships to enhance compassionate care globally. we are dedicated to improving access to hospice and palliative care worldwide.

International
3
Mercy Health

Mercy Health will provide assistance, support and direction to all of the health care institutions and activities operated and maintained by its Subsidiaries. The mission of Mercy Health in performing these activities shall be to provide a…

—
4
World Relief Corp of National Association of Evangelicals

To boldly engage the world's greatest crises in partnership with the church.

International
5
Children of the Nations

To provide holistic, christ-centered care for orphaned and destitute children, enabling them to create positive and lasting change in their nations.

Human Services
6
Food for the Hungry Inc

Food for the hungry is a christian humanitarian aid and global development organization that has designed, developed and delivered solutions for more than 50 years so that children, families and communities can flourish. (continued on…

International
7
Children's Heartlink

We save children's lives by transforming pediatric heart care in underserved parts of the world.

—
8
Alight

Alight builds a meaningful life for and with the displaced. not simply addressing basic needs, but building a life filled with joy, dignity, connection, and purpose. we walk with them along their entire journey of displacement and deliver…

International
9
Global Health Ministry

We, global health ministry and trinity health, serve together in the spirit of the gospel as a compassionate and transforming healing presence within our communities. global health ministry is a member of trinity health.

International
10
World Pediatrics

World pediatrics' mission is to heal children and advance pediatric healthcare in the world. world pediatrics' program model is built upon long-term engagement and continuity of multi-specialty care through direct patient care and local…

International
11
Sign Fracture Care International

Sign partners with overseas surgeons to build sustainable orthopaedic capacity by donating education, instruments, and implants. by working with teaching hospitals and hosting educational conferences worldwide, sign equips surgeons to heal…

Health
12
Corus International Inc

TO MANAGE AN INTERNATIONAL DEVELOPMENT, HEALTH, AND RELIEF FOCUSED FAMILY OF ORGANIZATIONS HELPING PEOPLE AND COMMUNITIES LIFT THEMSELVES OUT OF POVERTY, SUPPORT WELL-BEING OF INDIVIDUALS, FAMILIES AND COMMUNITIES, AND PROVIDE…

Human Services
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Catholic Medical Mission Board Inc; the most unlike its peers is Priests for Life. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
05the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 105 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
12/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FIDELITY ADVISED FUND: $606,187 · OtherFIDELITY ADVISED FUNDFATHER NADOLNY GOOD NEWS FUND INC: $37,500 · Other+86 more: $467,034 · Other+86 moreCATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC: $26,000 · InternationalCATHOLIC …FEED THE CHILDREN INC: $25,303 · InternationalFEED THE …WORLD VISION INC: $14,302 · InternationalWORLD VIS…OPERATION SMILE INC: $11,000 · InternationalOPERATION…MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $10,303 · InternationalMEDECINS …COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $9,303 · InternationalCOOPERATI…SISTER OF MARY BOYSTOWN AND GIRLSTOWN INC: $7,303 · InternationalSISTER OF…BREAD AND WATER FOR AFRICA INC: $4,303 · InternationalSOARING EAGLE: $19,303 · Human ServicesCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC: $8,303 · Human ServicesCOVENANT HOUSE: $4,303 · Human Services+1 more: $1,000 · Human ServicesMOSAIC: $17,803 · Housing & ShelterSIENA FRANCIS HOUSE: $11,303 · Housing & ShelterTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $21,000 · HealthPRIESTS FOR LIFE: $13,303 · Youth DevelopmentFatima Center USA: $9,303 · Religion
Other$1,110,721International$107,817Human Services$32,909Housing & Shelter$29,106Health$21,000Youth Development$13,303Religion$9,303

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFATHER NADOLNY GOOD NEWS FUND INC: $37,500 over 7y, 5.3% of budgetCATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC: $26,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetFEED THE CHILDREN INC: $25,303 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN: $21,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSOARING EAGLE: $19,303 over 7y, 0.2% of budgetMOSAIC: $17,803 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetSMILE TRAIN INC: $17,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetWORLD VISION INC: $14,302 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetPRIESTS FOR LIFE: $13,303 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetSIENA FRANCIS HOUSE: $11,303 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetOPERATION SMILE INC: $11,000 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetMEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC: $10,303 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetCOOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC: $9,303 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFatima Center USA: $9,303 over 7y, 0.1% of budgetCHRISTIAN APPALACHIAN PROJECT INC: $8,303 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetSISTER OF MARY BOYSTOWN AND GIRLSTOWN INC: $7,303 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCOVENANT HOUSE: $4,303 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetBREAD AND WATER FOR AFRICA INC: $4,303 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMIDWEST YOUCAN FOUNDATION INC % MEGAN BUSING: $1,000 over 1y, 4.9% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FATHER NADOLNY GOOD NEWS FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds CATHOLIC MEDICAL MISSION BOARD INC ↗
  • Who funds FEED THE CHILDREN INC ↗
  • Who funds THE SHRINERS' HOSPITAL FOR CHILDREN ↗
  • Who funds SOARING EAGLE ↗
  • Who funds MOSAIC ↗
  • Who funds SMILE TRAIN INC ↗
  • Who funds WORLD VISION INC ↗
  • Who funds PRIESTS FOR LIFE ↗
  • Who funds SIENA FRANCIS HOUSE ↗
  • Who funds OPERATION SMILE INC ↗
  • Who funds MEDECINS SANS FRONTIERES USA INC ↗
  • Who funds COOPERATIVE FOR ASSISTANCE AND RELIEF EVERYWHERE INC ↗
  • Who funds Fatima Center USA ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

B & R Charitable Foundation IncTN17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: B & R Charitable Foundation Inc · Greater Horizons · Shell USA Company Foundation · The Chicago Community Trust · Renaissance Charitable Foundation Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · The Blackbaud Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Mary Louise Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Mary Louise Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 6%
  • The Shriners' Hospital for Children: 6% of income from government
  • Feed the Children Inc: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 105 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mary Louise’s filings →

More from the funding graph