Skip to content
The Mary Charitable Trust Ua Dtd 11/29/01 at a glance

· Private foundation

The Mary Charitable Trust Ua Dtd 11/29/01

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$18k
Granted FY2024still arriving
4
Grants FY2024still arriving
2
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Religion$192kRecreation & Sports$7kHealth$4kHuman Services$4kEducation$2kFood & Nutrition$2kPhilanthropy$1kArts & Culture$575Other$0
02FY2024 · 4 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k3 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $12k
$5,875
Median grant
2
States reached
$56k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
FOUNDATION OF ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF SYRACUSE$12,000
THE CATHEDRAL OF IMMACULATE CONCEPTION$5,875
PLAY FOR PINK$500
ASSOCIATION OF MARIAN HELPERS$25
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–23, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%BOYS TOWN: $25 → 12%AMERICAN RED CROSS: $100 → 14%FRANCIS HOUSE: $510 → 14%FRANCIS HOUSE: $500 → 14%FRANCIS HOUSE: $500 → 14%FRANCIS HOUSE: $100 → 14%FRANCIS HOUSE: $10 → 14%ADVOCATES INC: $200 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NY
MA
SD
IN
OH
PA
NE
MD
AZ
TN
DC
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

95%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$203k · 14 repeat orgs$10k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +68% since the first grant, against +29% for those funded once.

14 repeat relationships: 4 still active in FY2024, 10 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
26

Total granted

$203k
$10k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+68%
+29%

Still filing today

43%
42%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
Human ServicesHealthPublic Safety & DisasterReligionRecreation & SportsCrime & LegalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SO
    SHEPHERDS OF CHRIST MINISTRIES INC
    7× · 2017–2023 · $37k · revenue +23%
  • TL
    THE LOXAHATCHEE CLUB INC
    6× · 2017–2022 · $6k · revenue +45%
  • PF
    PLAY FOR PINK INC
    7× · 2017–2024 · $2k · revenue +46%

Funded once

  • RT
    ROAD TO EMMAUS MINISTRY
    one grant, 2022 · $3k
  • MG
    MASS GENERAL BRIGHAM INCORPORATED
    one grant, 2022 · $2k
  • VU
    VILLANOVA UNIVERSITYgraduated
    one grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue +39%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
St Vincent Hospital of the Hospital Sisters of the Third Order of St Franci s

To continue christ's healing love through delivery of competent & compassionate healthcare in an environment sensitive to the needs of all people. the hospital is committed to providing a broad range of quality inpatient and outpatient…

Health
2
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
3
Children's Health Care

We champion the health needs of children and families. we are committed to improving children's health by providing the highest-quality, family centered care, advanced through research and education.

Health
4
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
5
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
6
Holy Redeemer Health System

As a catholic health system, rooted in the tradition of the sisters of the holy redeemer, we care, comfort and heal, following the example of jesus, proclaiming the hope god offers in the midst of human struggle.

Health
7
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
8
Lehigh Valley Hospital

Our mission is to heal, comfort and care for the people of our community by providing advanced and compassionate health care of superior quality and value, supported by education and research.

Health
9
The Nebraska Medical Center

The Nebraska Medical Center (TNMC)'s mission is to lead the world in transforming lives to create a healthy future for individuals and communities through premier educational programs, innovative research, and extraordinary patient care.

Health
10
New York University

Nyu is a private university with approximately 60,000 matriculating students in 20 schools and institutes. nyu's primary missions are education, research and scholarship, and patient care.

Education
11
Ssm Health Care of Oklahoma Inc

Through our exceptional health care services, we reveal the healing presence of god.

Health
12
Cedars-Sinai Medical Center

As a leading academic healthcare organization, our mission is to elevate the health status of the communities we serve.(see schedule o for continuation)(continued)-we deliver exceptional healthcare enhanced by research and education-we…

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is St Jude Children's Research Hospital Inc; the most unlike its peers is Father Flanagan's Boys' Home. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

17 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 17 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
17/17
Grantees still filing
14/17
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

FOUNDATION OF ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF SYRACUSE: $98,000 · OtherFOUNDATION OF ROMAN CATHOLIC DIOCESE OF SYRACUSETHE CATHEDRAL OF IMMACULATE CONCEPTION: $47,890 · OtherTHE CATHEDRAL OF IMMACULATE CONCEPTION+27 more: $18,118 · Other+27 moreSHEPHERDS OF CHRIST MINISTRIES INC: $37,000 · ReligionSHEPHERDS OF CHRIST…THE LOXAHATCHEE CLUB INC: $5,700 · Recreation & SportsVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $2,000 · EducationFRANCIS HOUSE INC: $1,620 · Human ServicesADVOCATES INCORPORATED: $200 · Human ServicesAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $100 · Human Services+1 more: $25 · Human ServicesPLAY FOR PINK INC: $1,885 · Crime & LegalCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $100 · HealthST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $100 · HealthAmerican Heart Association Inc: $25 · Health
Other$164,008Religion$37,000Recreation & Sports$5,700Education$2,000Human Services$1,945Crime & Legal$1,885Health$225

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSHEPHERDS OF CHRIST MINISTRIES INC: $37,000 over 7y, 1.8% of budgetTHE LOXAHATCHEE CLUB INC: $5,700 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetVILLANOVA UNIVERSITY: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetPLAY FOR PINK INC: $1,885 over 7y, 0.0% of budgetFRANCIS HOUSE INC: $1,620 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetSAMARITAN CENTER INC: $1,500 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW YORK INC: $1,150 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetADVOCATES INCORPORATED: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC: $100 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFRIENDS OF DEWITT PARKS & REC INC: $50 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetFather Flanagan's Boys' Home: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetEASTER SEALS INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUNO BEACH POLICE FOUNDATION INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SHEPHERDS OF CHRIST MINISTRIES INC ↗
  • Who funds THE LOXAHATCHEE CLUB INC ↗
  • Who funds VILLANOVA UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds PLAY FOR PINK INC ↗
  • Who funds FRANCIS HOUSE INC ↗
  • Who funds SAMARITAN CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW YORK INC ↗
  • Who funds ADVOCATES INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds CYSTIC FIBROSIS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds American National Red Cross & Its Constituent Chapters and Branches ↗
  • Who funds ST JUDE CHILDREN'S RESEARCH HOSPITAL INC ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF DEWITT PARKS & REC INC ↗
  • Who funds Father Flanagan's Boys' Home ↗
  • Who funds American Heart Association Inc ↗
  • Who funds EASTER SEALS INC ↗
  • Who funds JUNO BEACH POLICE FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds DEWITT FIRE DEPT INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable E…Donor Advised Charita…Fidelity Investments …Amazonsmile Foundation
Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA7.5× affinity5 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Mary Charitable Trust Ua Dtd 11/29/01 funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Mary Charitable Trust Ua Dtd 11/29/01. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%13%25%38%50%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    3get no government money at all
    2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–50%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 40 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Mary Charitable Trust Ua Dtd 11/29/01’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home