Skip to content

· Public charity

The Mary Byron Project Inc

Stopping the cycle of partner violence.

$151k
Granted FY2026still arriving
1
Grants FY2026still arriving
1
States reached
$151k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2019 to 2024.

Education$424kCrime & Legal$25kHealth$20kYouth Development$20kHuman Services$5k
02FY2026 · 1 grant

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$150,850
Median grant
1
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION$150,850
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY19–26) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%BATTERED THOMAS' JUSTICE PROJECT: $10k → 11%UNITY HOUSE OF TROY: $10k → 11%NEW YORK LEGAL ASSISTANCE GROUP: $5k → 17%NATIONAL NETWORK TO END DOMESTIC VIOLENCE: $20k → 14%AMERICAN ACADEMY OF COSMETIC DENTISTRY FOUNDATION: $10k → 10%NATIONAL CRIME VICTIM LAW INSTITUTE: $5k → 12%UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION: $400k → 15%UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION: $151k → 15%ASSUMPTION HIGH SCHOOL: $12k → 15%ASSUMPTION HIGH SCHOOL: $12k → 15%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Alliance Against Domestic Abuse

To eliminate domestic violence and sexual assault and to empower victims through education, service, and social change.

Crime & Legal
2
National Resource Center On Domestic Violence Inc

The mission of the nrcdv is to strengthen and transform efforts to end domestic violence.

Crime & Legal
3
Domestic Violence & Sexual Assault Services of Whatcom County

The mission of domestic violence and sexual assault services is to support individuals affected by domestic violence, sexual assault, and sexual exploitation, and to lead the community toward ending these abuses of power.

Health
4
The Legal Aid Society of Northeastern New York Inc

The legal aid society of northeastern new york fights for fairness, dignity, and justice for those living in poverty and for a society which is inclusive and equitable for all. we transform lives, build community and empower people by…

Crime & Legal
5
The Network Advocating Against Domestic Violence

The Network is a group of 40+ member organizations dedicated to improving the lives of those impacted by gender-based violence through education, public policy and advocacy, and connecting community members with direct service providers.…

Human Services
6
Battered Women's Legal Advocacy Project

To promote justice for domestic and sexual violence victims--standpoint achieves its mission by advocating for system change, for secure access to justice for all, and to improve the legal system's response to domestic and sexual violence…

Crime & Legal
7
National Alliance to End Sexual Violence

The purpose of the national alliance to end sexual violence is to educate the policy community about federal laws, legislation, and appropriations impacting efforts to end sexual violence. the naesv publishes written analysis, tracks…

Crime & Legal
8
Next Door Solutions to Domestic Violence

To end domestic violence in the moment and for all time.

Human Services
9
New York City Gay and Lesbian Anti-Violence Project

The new york city gay and lesbian anti-violence project (avp) mission is to empower lgbtq and hiv-affected communities and allies to end all forms of violence through organizing and education, and support survivors through counseling and…

—
10
UltraViolet Education Fund

Ultraviolet education fund (uvef) is a 501c3 organization. ultraviolet is the premier national organization advocating for gender justice issues using creative, strategic campaigning and digital-first organizing. ultraviolet drives…

Civil Rights
11
New Mexico Coalition Against Domestic Violence

The coalition's mission is to improve the response to and reduce the impact of domestic violence in new mexico.

—
12
Office of the Appellate Defender

Oad strives to ensure that poor people convicted of felonies receive full and equal access to justice by providing exceptional appellate representation, improving the quality of indigent defense representation through education & training,…

Crime & Legal
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Day One of New York Inc; the most unlike its peers is Unity House of Troy Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 10 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
7/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

UNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INC: $550,850 · EducationUNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INC+1 more: $10,000 · EducationASSUMPTION HIGH SCHOOL INC: $24,000 · OtherNEW YORK LEGAL ASSISTANCE GROUP INC: $5,000 · OtherTHE SAFE ALLIANCE: $5,000 · OtherNational Network to End Domestic Violence Inc: $20,000 · Youth DevelopmentUNITY HOUSE OF TROY INC: $10,000 · HealthBATTERED WOMEN'S JUSTICE PROJECT: $10,000 · HealthDay One of New York Inc: $5,000 · Human ServicesNATIONAL CRIME VICTIM LAW INSTITUTE: $5,000 · Crime & Legal
Education$560,850Other$34,000Youth Development$20,000Health$20,000Human Services$5,000Crime & Legal$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetUNIVERSITY OF LOUISVILLE FOUNDATION INC: $550,850 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetNational Network to End Domestic Violence Inc: $20,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetAMERICAN ACADEMY OF COSMETIC DENTISTRY CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $10,000 over 1y, 5.7% of budgetUNITY HOUSE OF TROY INC: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBATTERED WOMEN'S JUSTICE PROJECT: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetNEW YORK LEGAL ASSISTANCE GROUP INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDay One of New York Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetNATIONAL CRIME VICTIM LAW INSTITUTE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTHE SAFE ALLIANCE: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Bank of America Charitable Foundation IncNC8.3× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Mary Byron Project Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Mary Byron Project Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 5%
  • National Crime Victim Law Institute: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
04Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Mary Byron Project Inc?

Find your warmest path to The Mary Byron Project Inc through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 10 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990 e-file return for fiscal year 2026, released 2026. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mary Byron Project’s filings →

More from the funding graph