Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Mary Ann and Lawrence Tucker Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$28k
Granted FY2024still arriving
6
Grants FY2024still arriving
4
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
01100% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Arts & Culture$131kEducation$95kEnvironment$68kReligion$38kFood & Nutrition$23kCrime & Legal$20kScience & Tech$15kInternational$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 6 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k5 grants · $18k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$5,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$33k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
DEMOCRACY NOW PRODUCTIONS$10,000
INTEGRATED REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT SERVICES$5,000
UPAYA ZEN CENTER$5,000
OAKWOOD SCHOOL$3,000
THE GARDEN CONSERVANCY$2,500
GREENWICH LAND TRUST$2,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY17–24) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 63% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%MENNONITE CENTRAL-EARTH QUAKE RELIEF: $5k → 9%OAKWOOD SCHOOL: $3k → 14%THE GARDEN CONSERVANCY: $10k → 6%FORTUNE SOCIETY: $10k → 13%DEMOCRACY NOW PRODUCTIONS: $50k → 17%UPAYA ZEN CENTER: $13k → 12%FAMILY RE-ENTRY OF CT: $5k → 9%CT-NOFA: $7k → 12%MIDDLE EAST RESEARCH & INFORMATION PROJECT: $3k → 9%SHENANDOAH VALLEY BLACK HERITAGE PROJECT: $3k → 11%SPIKENARD FARM HONEYBEE SANCTUARY: $5k → 12%OAKWOOD SCHOOL: $3k → 14%THE GARDEN CONSERVANCY: $10k → 6%THE FORTUNE SOCIETY: $5k → 13%DEMOCRACY NOW PRODUCTIONS: $25k → 17%UPAYA ZEN CENTER: $10k → 12%GREENWICH LAND TRUST: $5k → 9%CT-NOFA: $6k → 12%NEW COMMUNITY PROJECTS: $2k → 11%OAKWOOD SCHOOL: $3k → 14%THE GARDEN CONSERVANCY: $10k → 6%DEMOCRACY NOW PRODUCTIONS: $15k → 17%UPAYA ZEN CENTER: $10k → 12%GREENWICH LAND TRUST: $5k → 9%INTEGRATED REFUGEE & IMMIGRANT SERVICES: $5k → 12%THE IRAQI AND SYRIAN STUDENT PROJECT: $20k → 11%OAKWOOD SCHOOL: $3k → 14%THE GARDEN CONSERVANCY: $8k → 6%DEMOCRACY NOW PRODUCTIONS: $10k → 17%UPAYA ZEN CENTER: $5k → 12%GREENWICH LAND TRUST: $3k → 9%NORTHEAST ORGANIC FARMING ASSN OF CONNECTICUT: $5k → 12%THE IRAQI AND SYRIAN STUDENT PROJECT: $18k → 11%OAKWOOD SCHOOL: $3k → 14%THE GARDEN CONSERVANCY: $5k → 6%DEMOCRACY NOW PRODUCTIONS: $10k → 17%NORTHEAST ORGANIC FARMING ASSN OF CONNECTICUT: $5k → 12%THE IRAQI AND SYRIAN STUDENT PROJECT: $12k → 11%OAKWOOD SCHOOL: $3k → 14%THE GARDEN CONSERVANCY: $5k → 6%DEMOCRACY NOW PRODUCTIONS: $8k → 17%THE IRAQI AND SYRIAN STUDENT PROJECT: $8k → 11%OAKWOOD SCHOOL: $3k → 14%THE GARDEN CONSERVANCY: $5k → 6%DEMOCRACY NOW PRODUCTIONS: $5k → 17%OAKWOOD SCHOOL: $3k → 14%THE GARDEN CONSERVANCY: $3k → 6%DEMOCRACY NOW PRODUCTIONS: $5k → 17%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
PA
CT
CA
VA
NM
DC
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

89%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$364k · 11 repeat orgs$44k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +109% since the first grant, against +39% for those funded once.

11 repeat relationships: 5 still active in FY2024, 6 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

11
8

Total granted

$364k
$39k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+109%
+39%

Still filing today

55%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 82% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $5k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EnvironmentArts & CultureEducationHealthFood & NutritionInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TG
    THE GARDEN CONSERVANCY INC
    8× · 2017–2024 · $55k · revenue +109%
  • OS
    OAKWOOD SCHOOL
    8× · 2017–2024 · $24k · revenue +61%
  • TF
    THE FORTUNE SOCIETY INC
    2× · 2017–2020 · $15k · revenue +162%

Funded once

  • UW
    UNITED WORLD COLLEGES CO UWC INTERNATIONAL
    one grant, 2018 · $14k
  • TS
    The Spikenard Farm Incgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $5k · revenue +39%
  • MC
    MENNONITE CENTRAL-EARTH QUAKE RELIEF
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Organic Growers Research and Information Sharing N

To facilitate the developement of sustainable food systems by helping groweres to increase their knowledge of agro-ecosystems management and utilization of local and regional marketing strategies.

Food & Nutrition
2
Northeast Organic Farming Association of New Jersey Inc

NOFA-NJ is an Association of consumers, farmers and gardeners, creating a regionally based organic agricultural system which is economically viable. The corporation's goals are the following:- Increase the number of certified organic farms…

—
3
Northeast Organic Farming Assoc of Ny I

Nofa ny is an organization of consumers, gardeners and farmers working together to create a sustainable regional food system which is ecologically sound and economically viable. through demonstration and educational opportunities, we…

Food & Nutrition
4
Northeast Organic Farming Association of Vermont

The northeast organic farming association of vermont promotes organic practices to build an ecomnomically viable, ecologically sound and socially just vermont agricultural system that benefits all living things.

Arts & Culture
5
New York Botanical Garden

The new york botanical garden is a museum of plants and a scientific research center devoted to the study of plants and their uses. it is the garden's mission to improve public understanding of the natural world, horticulture, and the…

Environment
6
Northeast Organic Farming Association of New Hampshire

NOFA-NH actively promotes organic, regenerative, ecologically sound farming, gardening, eating, and land care practices for healthy communities. NOFA-NH helps people build local, just, and sustainable food systems.

Food & Nutrition
7
Grist Magazine Inc

Grist is an independent, non profit media organization dedicated to reporting on climate change.

Environment
8
The Norman Bird Sanctuary Trust

Our mission is to spark people's curiosity to explore, steward, and find peace and joy in nature. in service to this, norman bird sanctuary inspires, builds, and engages a community of stewards who preserve, protect, enjoy, and learn from…

Animals
9
Newtown Forest Association Inc

The Newtown Forest Association is the oldest private land trust organization in Connecticut. It has been dedicated for one hundred years to securing for the residents of Newtown and for posterity generally the benefits derived from open…

Environment
10
Stone Barns Restoration Corp Dba Stone Barns Center for Food & Agri

Stone barns center is a nonprofit farm, education, and research center with a mission to catalyze an ecological food culture. since 2004, we have been driving innovation in sustainable farming practices and mindful food choices that…

Arts & Culture
11
Innisfree Foundation Inc
—
12
New Garden Society Ltd

Since 2013 The New Garden Society TNGS has trained hundreds of incarcerated and detained students in Greater Boston in the art and science of plants In prisons prison hospitals and youth facilities our students are 13- 80 years old Every…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Garden Conservancy Inc; the most unlike its peers is Shenandoah Valley Black Heritage Project. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

10 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 10 of the 20 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
10/10
Grantees still filing
6/10
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE IRAQI AND SYRIAN STUDENT PROJECT: $57,480 · OtherTHE IRAQI AND SYRIAN STUDENT PROJECTUPAYA ZEN CENTER INC: $37,500 · OtherUPAYA ZEN CENTER INCUNITED WORLD COLLEGES CO UWC INTERNATIONAL: $14,350 · OtherUNITED WORLD COLLEGES CO UWC INTERNATIONALIndividual grant recipient: $12,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientTHE ACADAMIC RESEARDH INSTITUTE OF IRAQ: $10,000 · OtherTHE ACADAMIC RESEARDH INSTITUTE OF IRAQ+6 more: $22,025 · Other+6 moreDEMOCRACY NOW PRODUCTIONS INC: $127,500 · Arts & CultureDEMOCRACY NOW PRODUCTIONS INC+1 more: $3,000 · Arts & CultureTHE GARDEN CONSERVANCY INC: $55,000 · EnvironmentTHE GARDEN CONSERVAN…THE GREENWICH LAND TRUST INC: $12,500 · EnvironmentTHE GREENWICH LAND T…The Spikenard Farm Inc: $5,000 · EnvironmentThe Spikenard Farm I…OAKWOOD SCHOOL: $23,500 · EducationTHE FORTUNE SOCIETY INC: $15,000 · HealthNORTHEAST ORGANIC FARMING ASSOC OF CONNECTICUT INC: $10,000 · Food & NutritionMIDDLE EAST RESEARCH & INFO PROJECT: $3,000 · International
Other$153,855Arts & Culture$130,500Environment$72,500Education$23,500Health$15,000Food & Nutrition$10,000International$3,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetDEMOCRACY NOW PRODUCTIONS INC: $127,500 over 8y, 0.1% of budgetTHE GARDEN CONSERVANCY INC: $55,000 over 8y, 0.3% of budgetOAKWOOD SCHOOL: $23,500 over 8y, 0.0% of budgetTHE FORTUNE SOCIETY INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GREENWICH LAND TRUST INC: $12,500 over 3y, 0.3% of budgetNORTHEAST ORGANIC FARMING ASSOC OF CONNECTICUT INC: $10,000 over 2y, 1.9% of budgetINTEGRATED REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT SERVICES: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Spikenard Farm Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetMIDDLE EAST RESEARCH & INFO PROJECT: $3,000 over 1y, 1.3% of budgetSHENANDOAH VALLEY BLACK HERITAGE PROJECT: $3,000 over 1y, 13% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds DEMOCRACY NOW PRODUCTIONS INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GARDEN CONSERVANCY INC ↗
  • Who funds OAKWOOD SCHOOL ↗
  • Who funds THE FORTUNE SOCIETY INC ↗
  • Who funds THE GREENWICH LAND TRUST INC ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEAST ORGANIC FARMING ASSOC OF CONNECTICUT INC ↗
  • Who funds INTEGRATED REFUGEE AND IMMIGRANT SERVICES ↗
  • Who funds The Spikenard Farm Inc ↗
  • Who funds MIDDLE EAST RESEARCH & INFO PROJECT ↗
  • Who funds SHENANDOAH VALLEY BLACK HERITAGE PROJECT ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust IncIN9.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Mary Ann and Lawrence Tucker Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Mary Ann and Lawrence Tucker Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 10%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%25%50%75%100%share of the org’s income from government →median 37%
  • Integrated Refugee and Immigrant Services: 37% of income from government
  • Northeast Organic Farming Assoc of Connecticut Inc: 5% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
1get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 20 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Mary Ann and Lawrence Tucker’s filings →

More from the funding graph