Skip to content
The Martin F Greenberg Family Foundation Inc at a glance

· Private foundation

The Martin F Greenberg Family Foundation Inc

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$140k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
5
States reached
$100k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
01What it funds
0194% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Health$796kEducation$713kArts & Culture$82kHousing & Shelter$75kInternational$52kReligion$49kCivil Rights$30kHuman Services$18kOther$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $6k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $34k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $100k
$250
Median grant
5
States reached
$2.6M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
MAYO CLINIC$100,000
JARC Florida$18,000
ADL$15,800
Congregation B'nai Israel$5,090
Donna Klein Jewish Academy$360
Individual grant recipient$250
Judicial Watch$200
JEWISH NATIONAL FUND$100
NATIONAL MULTIPLE SCLEROSIS SOCIETY$100
THE HERITAGE FOUNDATION$100
NRA-ILA$100
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY22–22, $110) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 91% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%JCHAI: $10 → 10%WOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT: $100 → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

MN
IL
NY
PA
NJ
CT
CA
UT
CO
KY
VA
MD
TN
DC
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

93%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$1.8M · 36 repeat orgs$123k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +31% since the first grant, against +25% for those funded once.

36 repeat relationships: 8 still active in FY2024, 28 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

36
30

Total granted

$1.8M
$123k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+31%
+25%

Still filing today

50%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $200 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
HealthAnimalsEducationArts & CulturePublic BenefitInternationalOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • FA
    FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $500k · revenue +49%
  • TC
    The Curetivity Foundation
    2× · 2020–2023 · $203k · revenue +113%
  • JA
    JEWISH ASSOCIATION FOR RESIDENTIAL CARE INC
    4× · 2021–2024 · $75k · revenue +33%

Funded once

  • AF
    AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOMgraduated
    one grant, 2017 · $50k · revenue +206%
  • JC
    Jewish Community Center
    one grant, 2021 · $17k
  • AL
    ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE
    one grant, 2019 · $15k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Sanford Burnham Prebys Medical Discovery Institute

Sanford burnham prebys medical discovery institute's mission is to advance the biomedical sciences by cultivating the next generation of scientific leaders, providing meaningful opportunities for researchers of all backgrounds to learn,…

Health
2
Memorial Sloan-Kettering Cancer Center

Leadership in the prevention, treatment, and cure of cancer through excellence, vision and cost effectiveness in patient care, outreach programs, research, and education.

Health
3
Dana-Farber Cancer Institute Inc

The mission of dfci is to provide expert, compassionate, and equitable care to children, adults, and their families, while advancing the understanding, diagnosis, treatment, cure, and prevention of cancer and related diseases. we train new…

Health
4
Samuel Waxman Cancer Research Foundation

The samuel waxman cancer research foundation (the "foundation") funds innovative research to bring faster cures to patients. in addition to supporting ongoing collaborative research in specific cancers, our scientists are investigating the…

—
5
New York Genome Center Inc

Operate a state-of-the-art, world-class genomic research center that creates and uses advanced genomics to understand the genetic basis of disease. for more information, see schedule o.

Health
6
American Academy of Neurology

The Academy's mission is to enhance member career fulfillment and promote brain health for all.

Community Improvement
7
Van Andel Research Institute

Medical research organization van andel research institute is an independent biomedical research organization committed to improving the health and enhancing the lives of current and future generations.

Health
8
Fred Hutchinson Cancer Center

Fred hutch cancer center ("fred hutch") unites innovative research and compassionate care to prevent and eliminate cancer and infectious disease. continued on schedule o

Health
9
Targeting Resistance in Cancer Cooperative
Health
10
American Academy of Dermatology Association Inc

To represent the interests of dermatologists and their patients. to influence and be a credible resource for public and private entities related to all policies and regulations that have the potential to affect the delivery of dermatologic…

Health
11
The Translational Genomics Research Institute

Please see schedule o

Health
12
American Association for the Advancement of Science

Advance science, engineering, and innovation throughout the world for the benefit of all. the world's largest multidisciplinary scientific society and a leading publisher of cutting-edge research through its science family of journals,…

Science & Tech
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Heritage Foundation; the most unlike its peers is Sunflower Creative Arts Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

36 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 36 of the 70 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
36/36
Grantees still filing
28/36
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

MAYO CLINIC: $635,000 · OtherMAYO CLINICBOCA RATON COMMUNITY HOSPITAL: $139,882 · OtherBOCA RATON COMMUNITY HOSPITALADL: $55,800 · OtherADL+43 more: $123,260 · Other+43 moreFLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $500,010 · EducationFLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FO…+2 more: $5,610 · EducationThe Curetivity Foundation: $202,704 · HealthThe Curetivi…+12 more: $10,402 · HealthUTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA: $40,000 · Arts & CultureSUNFLOWER CREATIVE ARTS INC: $36,331 · Arts & Culture+1 more: $36 · Arts & CultureJEWISH ASSOCIATION FOR RESIDENTIAL CARE INC: $75,300 · Housing & ShelterAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $50,000 · InternationalFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $2,000 · International+1 more: $300 · InternationalANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $15,000 · Civil Rights
Other$953,942Education$505,620Health$213,106Arts & Culture$76,367Housing & Shelter$75,300International$52,300Civil Rights$15,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC: $500,010 over 5y, 0.5% of budgetThe Curetivity Foundation: $202,704 over 2y, 4.7% of budgetJEWISH ASSOCIATION FOR RESIDENTIAL CARE INC: $75,300 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetAMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetUTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA: $40,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSUNFLOWER CREATIVE ARTS INC: $36,331 over 3y, 3.7% of budgetANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE: $15,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDONNA KLEIN JEWISH ACADEMY INC: $5,460 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetMAYO CLINIC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMorgan Pressel Foundation Inc: $3,607 over 2y, 0.3% of budgetFRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES: $2,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetVets Helping Heroes Inc: $1,000 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetJUDICIAL WATCH INC: $800 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetBIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC: $600 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCancer Care Inc: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS: $450 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetHUMANE SOCIETY OF BROWARD COUNTY INC: $425 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPeggy Adams Animal Rescue League of the Palm Beaches Inc: $400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetPLAY FOR PINK INC: $400 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Heart Association Inc: $335 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetDIABETES RESEARCH INSTITUTE FOUNDATION INC: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetAMERICAN CANCER SOCIETY INC: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetJEWISH NATIONAL FUND (KEREN KAYEMETH LEISRAEL) INC: $300 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPROSTATE CANCER FOUNDATION: $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE LEADERSHIP ACADEMY INC: $150 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetPARKINSON'S FOUNDATION INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE HERITAGE FOUNDATION: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetWOUNDED WARRIOR PROJECT INC: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAMYOTROPHIC LATERAL SCLEROSIS ASSN: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetAmerican Diabetes Association: $100 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe United States Holocaust Memorial Museum: $36 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetFIREFIGHTERS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION INC: $30 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetORT AMERICA INC: $25 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetHUNTSMAN CANCER FOUNDATION: $20 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetRUTH & NORMAN RALES JEWISH FAMILY SERVICES INC: $10 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJUDITH CREED HORIZONS FOR ACHIEVING INDEPENDENCE: $10 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds FLORIDA ATLANTIC UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds The Curetivity Foundation ↗
  • Who funds JEWISH ASSOCIATION FOR RESIDENTIAL CARE INC ↗
  • Who funds AMERICAN FRIENDS OF MAGEN DAVID ADOM ↗
  • Who funds UTAH SYMPHONY & OPERA ↗
  • Who funds SUNFLOWER CREATIVE ARTS INC ↗
  • Who funds ANTI-DEFAMATION LEAGUE ↗
  • Who funds DONNA KLEIN JEWISH ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds MAYO CLINIC ↗
  • Who funds Morgan Pressel Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds FRIENDS OF THE ISRAEL DEFENSE FORCES ↗
  • Who funds Vets Helping Heroes Inc ↗
  • Who funds JUDICIAL WATCH INC ↗
  • Who funds BIG DOG RANCH RESCUE INC ↗
  • Who funds Cancer Care Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE AMERICAN SOCIETY FOR THE PREVENTION OF CRUELTY TO ANIMALS ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Lippy FoundationBarton and Shirley We…Raymond Zimmerman Fam…National Philanthropi…Community Foundation …The Ayco Charitable F…The Goldman Sachs Cha…Jewish Communal FundVanguard Charitable E…Gs Donor Advised Phil…Morgan Stanley Global…Raymond James Charita…
Lippy FoundationOH13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Lippy Foundation · Barton and Shirley Weisman Foundation Inc · Raymond Zimmerman Family Foundation · National Philanthropic Trust · Community Foundation for Palm Beach and Martin Counties Inc · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · Jewish Communal Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Gs Donor Advised Philanthropy Fund for Wealth Management Inc · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Martin F Greenberg Family Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Martin F Greenberg Family Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 70%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%3%5%8%10%share of the org’s income from government →median 0%
  • Jewish Association for Residential Care Inc: 1% of income from government
  • Big Dog Ranch Rescue Inc: 0% of income from government
  • Wounded Warrior Project Inc: 0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–10%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 70 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Martin F Greenberg Family’s filings →

More from the funding graph

The unnamed billions
grants reported with no recipient in the public record
The regranting layer
51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
The DAF merry-go-round
$9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
The endowment market
who holds foundation money, and what just moved
The camps
funders cluster by geography, not ideology
By state
where grant money is based, and what stays home