Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Mark Butler Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$16k
Granted FY2025still arriving
2
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Human Services$206kHealth$126kYouth Development$115kEducation$60kPublic Safety & Disaster$53kPhilanthropy$50kAnimals$50kHousing & Shelter$26kOther$0
02FY2025 · 2 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k1 grant · $6k
  • $10k–50k1 grant · $10k
$10,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CENTRAL PENNSYLVANIA YOUTH BALLET$10,000
WHITAKER CENTER$6,095
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY17–22, $84k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 68% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%JOYFUL HEART FOUNDATION: $30k → 17%JAKE OWEN FOUNDATION: $20k → 14%HOPE STATION OPPORTUNITY AREA COUNCIL: $26k → 8%DAUPHIN COUNTY CASA: $5k → 12%BRETHREN COMMUNITY MINISTRIES: $2k → 12%CARLISLE DAY CARE CENTER DBA CARLISLE EARLY EDUCATION CENTER: $950 → 8%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

NY
MA
OR
PA
NJ
CA
MD
AZ
TN

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

62%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$453k · 14 repeat orgs$283k to everyone else

14 repeat relationships — 1 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 1 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

14
21

Total granted

$453k
$273k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+4%
+30%

Still filing today

57%
81%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 38% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $10k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesEducationHealthYouth DevelopmentArts & CulturePublic Safety & DisasterOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • TH
    THE HAROLD AND CAROLE PUMP FOUNDATION (FKA THE HAROLD PUMP FOUNDATION)
    3× · 2017–2019 · $100k · revenue +78%
  • SW
    SCOTT WILLIS LEGACY FOUNDATION
    3× · 2018–2020 · $45k · revenue +10% · 28% of their budget
  • CR
    CAL RIPKEN SR FOUNDATION INC
    2× · 2017–2021 · $28k · revenue +0%

Funded once

  • ALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INCgraduated
    one grant, 2024 · $50k · revenue +80%
  • FO
    Friends of Pima Animal Care Centergraduated
    one grant, 2023 · $50k · revenue +30%
  • JOYFUL HEART FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2018 · $30k · revenue +22%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Center That Cares

The mission of the center that cares is to deliver services to the people of the hill district community in pittsburgh, pa that enriches and empowers their lives academically, socially, culturally and recreationally. we service over 100…

Human Services
2
The Young Women's Christian Association of Carlisle Pa

The young women's christian association of carlisle, pennsylvania is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women and girls and promoting peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all. ywcas across the country are distinguished by…

Human Services
3
Crispus Attucks Association of York Pa

The crispus attucks association of york, pennsylvania is a comprehensive non-profit entity that provides education services, human services, community development and affordable housing that enhances the quality of life for a diverse…

Housing & Shelter
4
Corporate Alliance for Drug Education

Organization's mission: the mission of cadekids is to promote children's potential for growth through comprehensive, school-based and community-based youth development and support programs that are begun at an early age and are designed to…

5
Hope for Cleveland's Children
6
Caris Foundation International
International
7
Caris Foundation
Philanthropy
8
The Young Women's Christian Association of York Pa

Ywca york is dedicated to eliminating racism, empowering women, and promoting peace, justice, freedom and dignity for all.

9
Chase the Victory Corporation

Our mission is to strengthen the support of families grieving the loss of a child, fighting childhood cancer, and inspire hope and kindness.

Human Services
10
Upmc Carlisle

Upmc carlisle's mission is to serve the community by providing access to outstanding patient care and to shape tomorrow's health care system through clinical and technological innovation, research and education.

Health
11
HOPE4YOUTH Cancer Foundation
Health
12
Karli Short Better Tomorrow Foundation

We started the karli short better tomorrow scholarship fund to provide financial security to students who are grappling with the fallout from gun violence.

Education

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Diakon Child Family & Community Ministries and the most unlike its peers is Jake Owen Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyAnimal Rescue and AdoptionHomeless Services & ShelterProfessional Ballet Compani…Child Abuse Advocacy Servic…Public School District Foun…Youth Development CentersFaith-Based Liberal Arts Co…Community Arts OrganizationsDomestic Violence Crisis Se…Christian Missionary Organi…Cancer Support Organizations
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 25 years old; the field is 19. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number18%4%<5yr13%8%5–10yr19%20%10–20yr17%40%20–35yr15%16%35–55yr17%12%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value18%1%<5yr13%11%5–10yr19%10%10–20yr17%68%20–35yr15%8%35–55yr17%2%55yr+

The field is 18% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 1% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 9% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/26
the rest of the field
9%
7,129/78,136

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 36 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
6
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
20/26
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

CARLISLE KIWANIS FOUNDATION — $151,000 · OtherCARLISLE KIWANIS FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient — $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientPENN STATE HERSHEY MED CENTER — $16,700 · OtherCAL RIPKEN SR FOUNDATION INC — $27,503 · OtherCAL RIPKEN SR FOUNDATION INCSAFE HARBOUR INC — $26,000 · OtherSAFE HARBOUR INCWHITAKER CENTER FOR SCIENCE AND THE ARTS — $13,273 · OtherYATIMA GROUP FUND — $15,000 · Other+15 more — $65,824 · Other+15 moreTHE HAROLD AND CAROLE PUMP FOUNDATION (FKA THE HAROLD PUMP FOUNDATION) — $100,000 · HealthTHE HAROLD AND …BLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $3,500 · HealthJOYFUL HEART FOUNDATION — $30,000 · Human ServicesJOYFUL HEART…HOPE STATION OPPORTUNITY AREA NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL — $26,000 · Human ServicesHOPE STATION…Jake Owen Foundation — $20,000 · Human ServicesJake Owen Fo…DAUPHIN COUNTY CASA — $5,000 · Human ServicesDAUPHIN COUN…+2 more — $2,625 · Human ServicesSUMMER PROGRAM FOR YOUTH — $61,113 · Youth DevelopmentSUMMER PRO…CHAMPIONS FOR CHILDREN — $4,815 · Youth DevelopmentCHAMPIONS …ALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC — $50,000 · Public Safety & DisasterNORTH MIDDLETON TOWNSHIP VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY 1 — $3,345 · Public Safety & DisasterFriends of Pima Animal Care Center — $50,000 · AnimalsSCOTT WILLIS LEGACY FOUNDATION — $45,000 · Philanthropy
Other$335,300Health$103,500Human Services$83,625Youth Development$65,928Public Safety & Disaster$53,345Animals$50,000Philanthropy$45,000

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetTHE HAROLD AND CAROLE PUMP FOUNDATION (FKA THE HAROLD PUMP FOUNDATION) — $100,000 over 3y, 5.7% of budgetSUMMER PROGRAM FOR YOUTH — $61,113 over 7y, 9.7% of budgetALL HANDS AND HEARTS SMART RESPONSE INC — $50,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetFriends of Pima Animal Care Center — $50,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetSCOTT WILLIS LEGACY FOUNDATION — $45,000 over 3y, 28% of budgetJOYFUL HEART FOUNDATION — $30,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetCAL RIPKEN SR FOUNDATION INC — $27,503 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetHOPE STATION OPPORTUNITY AREA NEIGHBORHOOD COUNCIL — $26,000 over 1y, 22% of budgetSAFE HARBOUR INC — $26,000 over 1y, 2.4% of budgetJake Owen Foundation — $20,000 over 1y, 2.0% of budgetYATIMA GROUP FUND — $15,000 over 1y, 8.6% of budgetWHITAKER CENTER FOR SCIENCE AND THE ARTS — $13,273 over 2y, 0.4% of budgetSIENA UNIVERSITY — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDAUPHIN COUNTY CASA — $5,000 over 1y, 2.7% of budgetSECTION 16H GROUP — $5,000 over 1y, 1.7% of budgetCHAMPIONS FOR CHILDREN — $4,815 over 2y, 14% of budgetBOYS & GIRLS CLUB OF HARRISBURGINC — $3,997 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetBLOOD CANCER UNITED INC — $3,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetNORTH MIDDLETON TOWNSHIP VOLUNTEER FIRE COMPANY 1 — $3,345 over 1y, 1.8% of budgetLEADERSHIP CUMBERLAND — $2,250 over 1y, 2.2% of budgetBRETHREN COMMUNITY MINISTRIES — $1,675 over 1y, 1.2% of budgetTHE BISON FOUNDATION — $1,061 over 1y, 1.4% of budgetCARLISLE DAY CARE CENTER — $950 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetDIAKON CHILD FAMILY & COMMUNITY MINISTRIES — $136 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Foundation for Enhancing CommunitiesPA19.5× affinity7 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Foundation for Enhancing Communities · Partnership for Better Health · Schwab-Silfen Foundation · The Donald B and Dorothy L Stabler Foundation · United Way of Carlisle & Cumberland County · Anne & Philip Glatfelter III Family Foundation · Community Aid Inc · United Way of the Capital Region · Ppl Foundation · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · American Online Giving Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Mark Butler Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 40%2%8%17%30%your share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 12%
  • Cal Ripken Sr Foundation Inc12% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
4get no government money at all
7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

05Through Plinth

Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

How do I get to The Mark Butler Foundation?

Find your warmest path to The Mark Butler Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 36 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph