Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Marie L and Donald W Doyle Foundation Inc

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$83k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
8
States reached
$12k
Largest
01What it funds
0197% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2025.

Education$42kReligion$41kHealth$37kRecreation & Sports$26kScience & Tech$16kArts & Culture$15kHuman Services$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k12 grants · $61k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $22k
$4,870
Median grant
8
States reached
$628k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
PREGNANCY CENTER NORTH$12,049
PONO CAPER ASTRO & PHYSICS ED$10,000
NORTH SHORE COMMUNITY BAPTIST CHURCH$9,739
RTSCF$8,333
FOSTERING HOPE NEW ENGLAND INC$5,000
BETHANY BIRCHES CAMP$4,870
COVENANT CHRISTIAN ACADEMY$4,870
FIERCE ATHLETE INC$4,628
CHURCH THE IMMACULATE CONCEPTION$4,628
MOUNT ST MARY S SEMINARY$4,628
THE DOMINICAN HOUSE STUDIES$4,628
THE HELPING UP MISSION$4,628
BASILICA OF THE ASSUMPTION$3,000
IMMACULATE CONCEPTION CATHOLIC CHURCH$2,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY25–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 9%FOSTERING HOPE NEW ENGLAND INC: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

VT
MA
WY
PA
RI
MD
AZ
DC
TX
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$156k · 12 repeat orgs$31k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +17% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

12 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

12
4

Total granted

$156k
$24k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+17%
0%

Still filing today

42%
75%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’20’21’22’23’24’25
HealthEducationHuman ServicesOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • PC
    PREGNANCY CENTER NORTH INC
    7× · 2017–2025 · $25k · revenue +133%
  • CC
    COVENANT CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC
    3× · 2023–2025 · $23k · revenue +17%
  • HU
    HELPING UP MISSION INC
    2× · 2024–2025 · $6k · revenue +29%

Funded once

  • GC
    GORDON COLLEGE
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +9%
  • MP
    Mals Pals Foundation
    one grant, 2024 · $6k · revenue -64%
  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Boston Center for Biblical Counseling
Philanthropy
2
Berkshire Christian College

To provide for advent christian education through certificate programs and partnerships with gorden-conwell theological seminary and eastern university.

Education
3
Berkshire Institute for Christian Studies Inc

Berkshire institute for christian studies is a one to two year program of religious studies and nurture

—
4
Bangor Theological Seminary
Religion
5
Brookshire New Birth Ministries

To provide a transitional living faclity for battered women, women released from prison and women rehabing from drug addiction

Human Services
6
Gbnpc Inc

GBNPC exists to proclaim the Gospel of Jesus Christ by compassionately offering Biblical, life-affirming alternatives to people facing unplanned pregnancies and other sexual crises/decisions.

—
7
Gaston Christian School Inc

The mission of gaston christian school is to help students mature spiritually and excel academically by offering a biblically integrated, college-preparatory program that will enable them to impact the kingdom of god by living productive…

—
8
Puritan Reformed Theological Seminary

To prepare students to serve christ and his church through biblical, experiential and practical ministry. prts provides theological training and instruction in accordance with the scriptures and the historic reformed creeds for promotion…

Education
9
New England Frontier Camp Corp

Christian training for youth

Recreation & Sports
10
Hill Top Center
Health
11
Hope Pregnancy Resource Center

We give christian schools information on unplanned or crisis pregnancies so informed decisions can be made.

Human Services
12
The Covenant Preparatory School

The covenant preparatory school assists parents in developing individuals of strong intellect, spirit, body, and heart by providing a college preparatory education to pre-kindergarten through twelfth grade students grounded in christian…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fostering Hope New England Inc; the most unlike its peers is Mals Pals Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
9/9
Grantees still filing
4/9
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COVENANT CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC: $22,505 · OtherCOVENANT CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INCFierce Athlete Inc: $16,628 · OtherFierce Athlete IncPONO CAPER ASTRO & PHYSICS ED: $16,250 · OtherPONO CAPER ASTRO & PHYSICS EDNORTH SHORE COMMUNITY BAPTIST CHURCH: $14,739 · OtherNORTH SHORE COMMUNITY BAPTIST CHURCHRTSCF: $14,583 · OtherRTSCFBETHANY BIRCHES CAMP INC: $9,870 · OtherBETHANY BIRCHES CAMP INCDOMINICAN HOUSE OF STUDIES: $9,628 · OtherDOMINICAN HOUSE OF STUDIESCHURCH THE IMMACULATE CONCEPTION: $9,628 · OtherCHURCH THE IMMACULATE CONCEPTIONMOUNT ST MARY S SEMINARY: $7,749 · OtherMOUNT ST MARY S SEMINARYHELPING UP MISSION INC: $5,628 · OtherIndividual grant recipient: $5,045 · Other+3 more: $8,590 · Other+3 morePREGNANCY CENTER NORTH INC: $25,003 · HealthPREGNANCY CENTER N…Mals Pals Foundation: $6,250 · HealthMals Pals Foundati…GORDON COLLEGE: $10,000 · EducationFOSTERING HOPE NEW ENGLAND INC: $5,000 · Human Services
Other$140,843Health$31,253Education$10,000Human Services$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetPREGNANCY CENTER NORTH INC: $25,003 over 7y, 1.9% of budgetCOVENANT CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC: $22,505 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetFierce Athlete Inc: $16,628 over 3y, 2.8% of budgetGORDON COLLEGE: $10,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetBETHANY BIRCHES CAMP INC: $9,870 over 2y, 0.9% of budgetMals Pals Foundation: $6,250 over 1y, 3.9% of budgetHELPING UP MISSION INC: $5,628 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetFOSTERING HOPE NEW ENGLAND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.8% of budgetTHEOLOGY OF THE BODY FOUNDATION: $2,590 over 1y, 5.7% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds PREGNANCY CENTER NORTH INC ↗
  • Who funds COVENANT CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC ↗
  • Who funds Fierce Athlete Inc ↗
  • Who funds GORDON COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds BETHANY BIRCHES CAMP INC ↗
  • Who funds Mals Pals Foundation ↗
  • Who funds HELPING UP MISSION INC ↗
  • Who funds FOSTERING HOPE NEW ENGLAND INC ↗
  • Who funds THEOLOGY OF THE BODY FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

American Online Giving Foundation IncDE5.8× affinity4 shared granteesties to 3 of 3Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Marie L and Donald W Doyle Foundation Inc funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Marie L and Donald W Doyle Foundation Inc. Bigger dots raise more.

2023
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 30%1%3%6%10%funder's share of their income ↑0%5%10%15%20%share of the org’s income from government →median 2%
  • Helping Up Mission Inc: 5% of income from government
  • Bethany Birches Camp Inc: 2% of income from government
  • Gordon College: 1% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
3get no government money at all
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–20%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 18 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Marie L and Donald W Doyle’s filings →

More from the funding graph