· Private foundation
The Marie L and Donald W Doyle Foundation Inc
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k12 grants · $61k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $22k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| PREGNANCY CENTER NORTH | $12,049 |
| PONO CAPER ASTRO & PHYSICS ED | $10,000 |
| NORTH SHORE COMMUNITY BAPTIST CHURCH | $9,739 |
| RTSCF | $8,333 |
| FOSTERING HOPE NEW ENGLAND INC | $5,000 |
| COVENANT CHRISTIAN ACADEMY | $4,870 |
| BETHANY BIRCHES CAMP | $4,870 |
| THE DOMINICAN HOUSE STUDIES | $4,628 |
| THE HELPING UP MISSION | $4,628 |
| CHURCH THE IMMACULATE CONCEPTION | $4,628 |
| FIERCE ATHLETE INC | $4,628 |
| MOUNT ST MARY S SEMINARY | $4,628 |
| BASILICA OF THE ASSUMPTION | $3,000 |
| IMMACULATE CONCEPTION CATHOLIC CHURCH | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY25–25, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +17% since the first grant, against 0% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 0 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 92% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- PCPREGNANCY CENTER NORTH INC7× · 2017–2025 · $25k · revenue +133%
- CCCOVENANT CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC3× · 2023–2025 · $23k · revenue +17%
- HUHELPING UP MISSION INC2× · 2024–2025 · $6k · revenue +29%
Funded once
- GCGORDON COLLEGEone grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +9%
- MPMals Pals Foundationone grant, 2024 · $6k · revenue -64%
- IGIndividual grant recipientone grant, 2023 · $5k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide for advent christian education through certificate programs and partnerships with gorden-conwell theological seminary and eastern university.
Berkshire institute for christian studies is a one to two year program of religious studies and nurture
To provide a transitional living faclity for battered women, women released from prison and women rehabing from drug addiction
GBNPC exists to proclaim the Gospel of Jesus Christ by compassionately offering Biblical, life-affirming alternatives to people facing unplanned pregnancies and other sexual crises/decisions.
The mission of gaston christian school is to help students mature spiritually and excel academically by offering a biblically integrated, college-preparatory program that will enable them to impact the kingdom of god by living productive…
To prepare students to serve christ and his church through biblical, experiential and practical ministry. prts provides theological training and instruction in accordance with the scriptures and the historic reformed creeds for promotion…
Christian training for youth
We give christian schools information on unplanned or crisis pregnancies so informed decisions can be made.
The covenant preparatory school assists parents in developing individuals of strong intellect, spirit, body, and heart by providing a college preparatory education to pre-kindergarten through twelfth grade students grounded in christian…
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Fostering Hope New England Inc and the most unlike its peers is Mals Pals Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
9 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 9 of the 18 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds PREGNANCY CENTER NORTH INC ↗
- Who funds COVENANT CHRISTIAN ACADEMY INC ↗
- Who funds Fierce Athlete Inc ↗
- Who funds GORDON COLLEGE ↗
- Who funds BETHANY BIRCHES CAMP INC ↗
- Who funds Mals Pals Foundation ↗
- Who funds HELPING UP MISSION INC ↗
- Who funds FOSTERING HOPE NEW ENGLAND INC ↗
- Who funds THEOLOGY OF THE BODY FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Amazonsmile Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Marie L and Donald W Doyle Foundation Inc funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Helping Up Mission Inc — 5% of income from government
- Bethany Birches Camp Inc — 2% of income from government
- Gordon College — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.