Skip to content

· Private foundation

The March Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$228k
Granted FY2024still arriving
30
Grants FY2024still arriving
16
States reached
$56k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2024.

Education$680kYouth Development$99kRecreation & Sports$76kScience & Tech$48kReligion$19kFood & Nutrition$16kHuman Services$16kArts & Culture$5kOther$0
02FY2024 · 30 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k22 grants · $82k
  • $10k–50k7 grants · $90k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $56k
$5,000
Median grant
16
States reached
$1.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ELIZABETH CITY STATE UNIVERSITY$55,524
CREATE YOUR DREAM$20,000
H KAY JARVIS ALZ RESEARCH ENDOWMENT$15,500
TENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY$13,333
Individual grant recipient$11,000
THE FIRST TEE OF ATLANTA$10,500
HAMPTON UNIVERSITY$10,000
HOWARD UNIVERSITY$10,000
ROSS PEROT STEM PROGRAM$7,500
BILL DICKEY SCHOLARSHIP ASSOC INC$6,250
MOREHOUSE COLLEGE$5,300
CLARK ATLANTA UNIVERSITY$5,000
SHAW UNIVERSITY$5,000
UNIVERSITY OF NORTH TEXAS$5,000
GEORGIA INSTITUTE OF TECHNOLOGY$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–24, $2k) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%LEGACY LADIES: $500 → 14%HOPE FOR PRISONERS: $1k → 13%100 BLACK MEN OF NORTH METRO ATLANTA INC: $350 → 13%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

IL
NV
OH
RI
CA
VA
AZ
AR
TN
NC
DC
LA
MS
AL
GA
TX
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

83%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$864k · 26 repeat orgs$178k to everyone else

26 repeat relationships: 17 still active in FY2024, 9 since wound down; 13 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

26
16

Total granted

$864k
$141k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

-13%
+61%

Still filing today

35%
38%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 84% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $37k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyArts & CultureRecreation & SportsOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • EC
    ELIZABETH CITY STATE UNIVERSITY
    2× · 2023–2024 · $156k
  • 1A
    100 ACADEMY OF EXCELLENCE INC
    5× · 2017–2022 · $92k · revenue -44%
  • CY
    Create Your Dreams Inc
    7× · 2017–2024 · $89k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • PQ
    Paul Quinn College
    one grant, 2022 · $50k · revenue +11%
  • NC
    N CAROLINA A&T STATE UNIV
    one grant, 2020 · $14k
  • BU
    BRENAU UNIVERSITY INCgraduated
    one grant, 2019 · $14k · revenue +61%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Coker University

Coker university is a student-centered, comprehensive university. it is dedicated to providing every student an academic curriculum based upon a uniformly excellent liberal arts core that enhances the structured development of key personal…

Education
2
Wilberforce University Wilberforce University

Wilberforce university is a historically black college and university and the primary mission is to engage, support, and assist students in identifying and preparing for their respective purposes in life as social change agents, social…

Education
3
Manhattanville University

To educate students to be ethical and socially responsible leaders in a global community.

Education
4
Lehigh University

The university's goal in the coming decade is to advance learning through the integration of teaching, research and service to others. the core of this goal is to prepare graduates to engage with the world and lead lives of meaning. to do…

Education
5
John Brown University

John brown university (jbu) provides christ-centered education that prepares students to honor god and serve others by developing their intellectual, spiritual, and professional lives. (continued on schedule o)jbu serves traditional…

Education
6
Boston Architectural College

The bac is committed to provide excellence in design education grounded in practice and accessible to diverse communities.

—
7
Tusculum University

Building on a rich Presbyterian heritage and a pioneering spirit, Tusculum University provides an active and experiential education within a caring Christian environment to inspire civic engagement, enrich personal lives, and equip…

Education
8
Barton College

Founded in 1902, barton college is a four-year, private, liberal arts college located in wilson, n.c. the barton experience focuses on academic excellence within a wide range of professional and liberal arts programs leading to…

Education
9
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
10
LaGrange College

Education - lagrange college challenges the minds and inspires the souls of its students. founded in 1831 and committed to its relationship with the united methodist church and its wesleyan and liberal arts traditions, the college supports…

Education
11
Point Park University

Provides innovative education in a dynamic urban setting. dedicated to academic excellence and community engagement,we prepare students of diverse backgrounds with the knowledge, skill,and experience to lead meaningful lives as informed…

—
12
Howard Payne University

Howard payne university is a christ-centered academic community dedicated to excellence by developing and equipping the whole person for intellectual inquiry, personal and professional integrity, and service to god and humanity.

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Spelman College; the most unlike its peers is Why We Can T Wait. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

19 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 19 of the 55 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
19/19
Grantees still filing
10/19
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

ELIZABETH CITY STATE UNIVERSITY: $155,524 · OtherELIZABETH CITY STATE UNIVERSITYIndividual grant recipient: $62,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientH KAY JARVIS ALZ RESEARCH ENDOWMENT: $42,500 · OtherH KAY JARVIS ALZ RESEARCH ENDOWMENTTENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITY: $40,000 · OtherTENNESSEE STATE UNIVERSITYBILL DICKEY SCHOLARSHIP ASSOCIATION: $32,550 · OtherROSS PEROT STEM PROGRAM: $30,372 · OtherHAMPTON UNIVERSITY: $30,000 · Other+30 more: $230,151 · Other+30 more100 ACADEMY OF EXCELLENCE INC: $91,640 · Education100 ACADEMY OF EXCELLENCE …THE HOWARD UNIVERSITY: $50,250 · EducationTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITYPaul Quinn College: $50,000 · EducationPaul Quinn CollegeBRENAU UNIVERSITY INC: $13,700 · EducationBRENAU UNIVERSITY INCJOHNSON & WALES UNIVERSITY: $10,000 · Education+4 more: $25,800 · Education+4 moreCreate Your Dreams Inc: $89,456 · Arts & CultureCreate Yo…Good Golfers Better People of Metro Atlanta Inc: $56,075 · Recreation & SportsMINNIES FOOD PANTRY INC: $16,250 · Food & NutritionWHY WE CAN T WAIT: $5,000 · Youth DevelopmentBoss Kidz INC: $3,500 · Youth DevelopmentANDREW J YOUNG FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 · PhilanthropyHOPE FOR PRISONERS INC: $1,000 · Human ServicesLEGACY LADIES INC: $500 · Human Services100 BLACK MEN OF NORTH METRO ATLANTA INC: $350 · Human Services
Other$623,097Education$241,390Arts & Culture$89,456Recreation & Sports$56,075Food & Nutrition$16,250Youth Development$8,500Philanthropy$5,000Human Services$1,850

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budget100 ACADEMY OF EXCELLENCE INC: $91,640 over 5y, 0.1% of budgetCreate Your Dreams Inc: $89,456 over 7y, 3.1% of budgetGood Golfers Better People of Metro Atlanta Inc: $56,075 over 8y, 0.7% of budgetTHE HOWARD UNIVERSITY: $50,250 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetPaul Quinn College: $50,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetBILL DICKEY SCHOLARSHIP ASSOCIATION: $32,550 over 4y, 41% of budgetMINNIES FOOD PANTRY INC: $16,250 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetBRENAU UNIVERSITY INC: $13,700 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJOHNSON & WALES UNIVERSITY: $10,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetSpelman College: $8,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetMOREHOUSE COLLEGE: $7,800 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetWHY WE CAN T WAIT: $5,000 over 1y, 1.9% of budgetClark Atlanta University Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetTHE SHAW UNIVERSITY: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetANDREW J YOUNG FOUNDATION INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetBoss Kidz INC: $3,500 over 1y, 5.4% of budgetHOPE FOR PRISONERS INC: $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetLEGACY LADIES INC: $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budget100 BLACK MEN OF NORTH METRO ATLANTA INC: $350 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds 100 ACADEMY OF EXCELLENCE INC ↗
  • Who funds Create Your Dreams Inc ↗
  • Who funds Good Golfers Better People of Metro Atlanta Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE HOWARD UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Paul Quinn College ↗
  • Who funds BILL DICKEY SCHOLARSHIP ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds MINNIES FOOD PANTRY INC ↗
  • Who funds BRENAU UNIVERSITY INC ↗
  • Who funds JOHNSON & WALES UNIVERSITY ↗
  • Who funds Spelman College ↗
  • Who funds MOREHOUSE COLLEGE ↗
  • Who funds WHY WE CAN T WAIT ↗
  • Who funds Clark Atlanta University Inc ↗
  • Who funds THE SHAW UNIVERSITY ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

H Kay Jarvis and Kenneth B Jarvis FoundationTX13.6× affinity4 shared granteesties to 8 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: H Kay Jarvis and Kenneth B Jarvis Foundation · Georgia Power Foundation Inc · Enterprise Holdings Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The March Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The March Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%13%28%50%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The March Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The March Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 55 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on March’s filings →

    More from the funding graph