· Private foundation
The Mamie and Harold K Randall Charitable Trust
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
Read this first · the figures below need context
100% of The Mamie and Harold K Randall Charitable Trust’s FY2025 grant dollars went to Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund, not to grantees.
Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 0 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2019, the last year The Mamie and Harold K Randall Charitable Trust named its own grantees at scale: 10 organizations, $323k. It is dated, not current.
Organizations named directly on the return
Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.
What you funded, over time
Every grant clustered by its grantee’s IRS cause code (NTEE), by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2019
- Under $10k10 grants · $46k
- $10k–50k5 grants · $93k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $185k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| WEST SIDE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH | $120,000 |
| NEW CANAAN SOCIETY MANHATTAN | $65,000 |
| LEGACY MINDED MEN | $40,000 |
| YOUNG LIFE | $20,000 |
| GENEROSITY NY INC | $12,500 |
| CORNELL UNIVERSITY | $10,000 |
| NEW HOPE COMMUNITY MINISTRY | $10,000 |
| CHRISTIAN REFORMED CHURCH | $7,500 |
| CALVARY INTERNATIONAL CHURCH | $7,500 |
| DOUBLE HARVEST | $5,000 |
| STREET TO STREET | $5,000 |
| FAMILY PROMISE OF BERGEN COUNTY | $5,000 |
| NEW YORK FELLOWSHIP | $5,000 |
| VANTAGE HEALTH SYSTEMS INC | $5,000 |
| MISSION AVIATION FELLOWSHIP | $2,500 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–19, $109k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 9%. 37% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +61% since the first grant, against +25% for the ones you funded once.
12 repeat relationships — 9 still active in FY2019, 3 since wound down; 11 grantees were first funded in FY2019 (too recent to call). Read against FY2019, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2022, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- LMLegacy Minded Ministries2× · 2017–2019 · $69k · revenue +78%
- LPLuis Palau Association2× · 2017–2018 · $39k · revenue +54%
- CRCITY RELIEF INC2× · 2017–2018 · $35k · revenue +115%
Funded once
- NBNCS BERGEN COUNTY INCone grant, 2017 · $60k · revenue -22% · 50% of their budget
- HMHUTCHCRAFT MINISTRIES INCgraduatedone grant, 2017 · $25k · revenue +41%
- CCCAMPUS CRUSADE FOR CHRISTone grant, 2017 · $25k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
Christian Mission for the United Nations Community is a ministry aimed at leading the head of every nation and other top leaders to faith in Jesus Christ and helping them to walk in dependence upon God as they discharge the…
Support local churches, leaders, and christians from around the world through online content that strengthens and affirms their life in christ. committed to using every means possible to reach every age and life stage with the gospel…
The family research council's primary exempt purpose is to reaffirm and promote nationally, and particularly in washington, dc, the traditional family unit and the judeo-christian value system upon which it is built. frc's activities in…
To strengthen marriages and families, to encourage Christian fellowship as we evangelize the lost around us and minister to the needy with the resources God has blessed us.
Our ultimate mission at the porch is clear and simple: to raise up mighty sons of god who will carry the authority of the kingdom of heaven, and make jesus known in the earth. we desire to raise up men of god who will love his truth with…
Religious organization devoted to strengthening members' personal faith.
Counsel beleivers who are in need of spiritual and mental healing. bring non believers the good news of the gospel of grace. educate others on how to counsel through the word of god. provide seminars and conferences to enhance christian…
Dedicated to igniting personal transformation by affirming faith, inspiring hope, and equipping individuals, to live an intentional life in christ.
Training pastors and leaders in christian faith
The focus of the ministry is to establish christian camps and retreats that will reach men and women who have been affected by post traumatic stress disorder with the gospel of jesus christ, and equip them to recognize, manage, and…
To provide resources, training, and continuing support to leaders in the us and around the world in order that they may help others find freedom in christ.
Training & certification of christian biblical counselors
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Christian Union Inc and the most unlike its peers is Luis Palau Association. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 35 years old; the field is 16. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 22% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 2% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 13% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
25 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 25 of the 40 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds FIDELITY INVESTMENTS CHARITABLE GIFT FUND ↗
- Who funds Legacy Minded Ministries ↗
- Who funds NCS BERGEN COUNTY INC ↗
- Who funds Luis Palau Association ↗
- Who funds CITY RELIEF INC ↗
- Who funds HUTCHCRAFT MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds YOUNG LIFE ↗
- Who funds CSEHY SUMMER SCHOOL OF MUSIC ↗
- Who funds STREET 2 STREET ↗
- Who funds Cornell University ↗
- Who funds FAMILY PROMISE OF BERGEN COUNTY ↗
- Who funds CHRISTIAN UNION INC ↗
- Who funds NORTH JERSEY HOME SCHOOLERS ASSOCIATION INC ↗
- Who funds STAR OF HOPE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds NATIONAL CHRISTIAN FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds PAUSE MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds VANTAGE HEALTH SYSTEM INC ↗
- Who funds AMERICAN BIBLE SOCIETY ↗
- Who funds RENEW LIFE CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds NEW YORK FELLOWSHIP INC ↗
- Who funds DOUBLE HARVEST INC ↗
- Who funds JAMES HENRY COUNSELING ASSOCIATES ↗
- Who funds THE LEADERS OF FAITH FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds AMERICA'S KESWICK ↗
- Who funds ASHLEY HALL FOUNDATION ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Frank X & Mary Ethel Weny Charitable Trust · Columbia Bank Foundation · Julia Vander May Bakelaar Charitabl · Community Foundation of New Jersey · Johanna Van Lenten Charitable Tr · Natl Christian Charitable Fdn Inc · Raymond James Charitable Endowment Fund · National Philanthropic Trust · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Morgan Stanley Global Impact Funding Trust Inc · American Endowment Foundation · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Mamie and Harold K Randall Charitable Trust funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Vantage Health System Inc — 19% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to The Mamie and Harold K Randall Charitable Trust?
Find your warmest path to The Mamie and Harold K Randall Charitable Trust through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.