Skip to content
The Maloof Foundation at a glance

· Private foundation

The Maloof Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$301k
Granted FY2025still arriving
22
Grants FY2025still arriving
11
States reached
$50k
Largest
01What it fundsRead
02The needRead
03Its granteesRead
04Its fieldRead
05Through PlinthRead
01What it funds
0198% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Food & Nutrition$84kHealth$80kYouth Development$44kHuman Services$36kHousing & Shelter$28kReligion$25kArts & Culture$20kEmployment$18kOther$0
02FY2025 · 22 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k11 grants · $42k
  • $10k–50k10 grants · $209k
  • $50k–250k1 grant · $50k
$10,000
Median grant
11
States reached
$4.1M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE COMPASSIONATE FRIENDS$50,000
SPECS CHARITABLE FOUNDATION$35,000
THE STOREHOUSE OF NEW MEXICO$25,000
LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE FUND$25,000
ST CHARLES BORROMEO CHURCH$25,000
HABITAT FOR HUMANITY$25,000
THE CENTER FOR HOPE AND HEALING$20,000
MUSICAL INSTRUMENT MUSEUM$16,500
STUDENTS CLOTHING BANK$15,000
FIRST TEE OF SOUTEASTERN NEW MEXICO$12,000
ALBUQUERQUE YOUTH SYMPHONY$10,000
BIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF NEW MEX$5,000
PAWS AND STRIPES$5,000
ADELANTE DEVELOPMENT CENTER$5,000
AACA$5,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY20–25, $17k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%LITTLE SISTERS OF THE POOR: $3k → 32%STUDENTS CLOTHING BANK: $5k → 14%CHILDREN'S GRIEF CENTER OF NEW MEXICO: $5k → 14%CHILDREN'S GRIEF CENTER OF NEW MEXICO: $4k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

75%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$491k · 15 repeat orgs$168k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +24% since the first grant, against +7% for those funded once.

15 repeat relationships: 12 still active in FY2025, 3 since wound down; 10 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

15
10

Total granted

$491k
$58k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+24%
+7%

Still filing today

80%
50%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $110k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
Human ServicesHousing & ShelterEducationYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyFood & NutritionOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SN
    STOREHOUSE NEW MEXICO
    6× · 2020–2025 · $109k · revenue +72%
  • AD
    ADELANTE DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC
    4× · 2022–2025 · $23k · revenue +24%
  • SC
    Students Clothing Bank
    2× · 2024–2025 · $20k · revenue +28%

Funded once

  • TG
    THE GRIEF CENTER
    one grant, 2022 · $20k
  • GA
    GREATER ALBUQUERQUE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY
    one grant, 2024 · $10k · revenue +7%
  • SO
    SPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW MEXICO INC
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue -9%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Community Foundation of Southern New Mexico

The Community Foundation of Southern New Mexico serves as a community resource, connects donors to needs, and supports charitable organizations in their work.

Philanthropy
2
Southwest Care Center

To improve the health of people living in the culturally diverse communities of northern new mexico through access to the highest quality health care, education, research and advocacy.

—
3
Greater Albuquerque Chamber of Commerce

The greater albuquerque chamber of commerce works every day to make our community a place where businesses can grow and prosper, where people want to raise their families and where tourists want to visit. as the voice of business since…

—
4
New Mexico Dream Center of Albuquerque

New mexico dream center's mission is to restore the dreams of the hopeless, the helpless, the hurting and the broken. specifically, albuquerque new mexico has a huge gaping hole in services for homeless youth and trafficked minor children.…

Religion
5
New Mexico Aids Services Inc

New mexico aids services, inc provides housing, education and nutritional support to the public in response to the aids crisis.

Human Services
6
Santa Fe Community Foundation

The santa fe community foundation inspires philanthropic generosity, strengthens nonprofits, and fosters positive change to build a more vibrant, healthy, and resilient region. the foundation's vision is a thriving northern new mexico,…

Philanthropy
7
Albuquerque Health Care for the Homeless Inc

To provide caring and comprehensive health and supporting services, linking people experiencing homelessness to individual/collective solutions and to be a leader in creating service delivery models and solutions to homelessness.

Human Services
8
New Vistas

New vistas partners with and supports people with disabilities and families of children with special needs to enrich their quality of life in new mexico.

Human Services
9
New Mexico Community Trust

To build, invest and manage endowment funds to enhance the quality of new mexico through informed, strategic grantmaking.

—
10
Law Access New Mexico

Provide respectful high quality legal advice, counsel, brief services and referral to low-income New Mexicans and help remove barriers to the civil justice system.

—
11
Site Santa Fe

Guided by artists, rooted in new mexico, site santa fe celebrates contemporary creative expression.

Arts & Culture
12
Big Brothers Big Sisters of Southeastern New Mexic

Since the year 2000, bbbs senm has been matching youth in meaningful, enduring, professionally supported one-to-one mentoring relationships with screened adult volunteers who defend their potential and help them achieve their biggest…

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Justa Center Inc; the most unlike its peers is Spec's Charitable Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

20 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 20 of the 35 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
20/20
Grantees still filing
15/20
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

THE CENTER FOR HOPE AND HEALING: $85,000 · OtherTHE CENTER FOR HOPE AND HEALINGST CHARLES BORROMEO CHURCH: $45,000 · OtherST CHARLES BORROMEO CHURCHHABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $25,000 · OtherHABITAT FOR HUMANITYTHE GRIEF CENTER: $20,000 · OtherTHE GRIEF CENTERBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL NEW MEXICO INC: $15,000 · OtherADELANTE DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $22,500 · OtherADELANTE DEVELOPMENT CENTER INCMUSICAL INSTRUMENT MUSEUM: $21,500 · OtherMUSICAL INSTRUMENT MUSEUMPAWS AND STRIPES INC: $15,000 · Other+15 more: $60,500 · Other+15 moreSTOREHOUSE NEW MEXICO: $109,000 · Food & NutritionSTOREHOUSE NEW MEX…The Compassionate Friends Inc: $65,000 · HealthThe Compass…Spec's Charitable Foundation: $35,000 · PhilanthropySpec's Cha…LAW ENFORCEMENT ASSISTANCE FUND: $25,000 · PhilanthropyLAW ENFORC…THE FIRST TEE OF SOUTHEASTERN NEW MEXICO INC: $42,000 · Youth DevelopmentTHE FIRST…ALBUQUERQUE YOUTH SYMPHONY PROGRAM: $15,000 · Youth DevelopmentALBUQUERQ…Students Clothing Bank: $20,000 · Human ServicesCHILDREN'S GRIEF CENTER OF NM: $9,000 · Human ServicesLittle Sisters of The Poor: $2,500 · Human ServicesGREATER ALBUQUERQUE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterSARANAM LLC: $10,000 · Housing & ShelterBARRETT FOUNDATION: $7,000 · Housing & Shelter
Other$309,500Food & Nutrition$109,000Health$65,000Philanthropy$60,000Youth Development$57,000Human Services$31,500Housing & Shelter$27,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetSTOREHOUSE NEW MEXICO: $109,000 over 6y, 0.9% of budgetThe Compassionate Friends Inc: $65,000 over 2y, 1.4% of budgetTHE FIRST TEE OF SOUTHEASTERN NEW MEXICO INC: $42,000 over 5y, 3.3% of budgetADELANTE DEVELOPMENT CENTER INC: $22,500 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetMUSICAL INSTRUMENT MUSEUM: $21,500 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetStudents Clothing Bank: $20,000 over 2y, 1.7% of budgetPAWS AND STRIPES INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.4% of budgetBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS OF CENTRAL NEW MEXICO INC: $15,000 over 3y, 0.2% of budgetALBUQUERQUE YOUTH SYMPHONY PROGRAM: $15,000 over 2y, 1.5% of budgetGREATER ALBUQUERQUE HABITAT FOR HUMANITY: $10,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetSARANAM LLC: $10,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCHILDREN'S GRIEF CENTER OF NM: $9,000 over 2y, 0.6% of budgetBARRETT FOUNDATION: $7,000 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetSPECIAL OLYMPICS NEW MEXICO INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetREADING QUEST: $5,000 over 1y, 0.5% of budgetJUSTA CENTER INC: $2,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetMCPHERSON COLLEGE: $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Albuquerque Community…Pnm Tnmp FoundationNusenda FoundationThe Minneapolis Found…Carl C Anderson Sr an…Bnsf Railway Foundati…Washington Federal Fo…Charities Aid Foundat…Hancock Family Founda…The Frederick H Leonh…Nancy Ann Mellen Foun…Lineberry Foundation
Albuquerque Community FoundationNM28× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Albuquerque Community Foundation · Pnm Tnmp Foundation · Nusenda Foundation · The Minneapolis Foundation · Carl C Anderson Sr and Marie Jo Anderson Charitable Foundation · Bnsf Railway Foundation · Washington Federal Foundation · Charities Aid Foundation America · Hancock Family Foundation Inc · The Frederick H Leonhardt Foundation Inc · Nancy Ann Mellen Foundation · Lineberry Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Maloof Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Maloof Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%15%30%45%60%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    10report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–60%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Maloof Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Maloof Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 35 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Maloof’s filings →

    More from the funding graph

    The unnamed billions
    grants reported with no recipient in the public record
    The regranting layer
    51% of grant dollars land in the regranting layer
    The DAF merry-go-round
    $9.7B circulates between donor-advised funds
    The endowment market
    who holds foundation money, and what just moved
    The camps
    funders cluster by geography, not ideology
    By state
    where grant money is based, and what stays home