Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Malcolm and Lois Field Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$125k
Granted FY2025still arriving
14
Grants FY2025still arriving
1
States reached
$25k
Largest
01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Education$375kHealth$105kArts & Culture$40kReligion$39kFood & Nutrition$5kHousing & Shelter$3kOther$0
02FY2025 · 14 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k8 grants · $32k
  • $10k–50k6 grants · $93k
$5,000
Median grant
1
States reached
$2.5M
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
CMU$25,000
BETHLEHEM LUTHERAN CHURCH$15,000
FIRST FREE METHODIST CHURCH$15,000
SVSU$15,000
Individual grant recipient$13,380
Individual grant recipient$10,000
MID-MICHIGAN CHILDREN'S MUSEUM$5,000
SAINT JOHN PAUL II$5,000
EASTSIDE SOUP KITCHEN$5,000
SAGINAW BAY SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA$5,000
SAGINAW ART MUSEUM$5,000
CITY RESCUE MISSION$3,120
SAINT DEMETRIOS CHURCH$2,000
COMMUNITY BAPTIST CHURCH$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 15%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 97% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%HEMLOCK SPORTS BOOSTER: $13k → 9%SPRING ARBOR UNIVERSITY: $50k → 13%SAGINAW VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $260k → 14%BETHLEHEM LUTHERAN CHURCH: $15k → 18%CMU: $25k → 19%MID-MICHIGAN CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $5k → 18%SAGINAW ART MUSEUM: $5k → 18%VALLEY LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL: $50k → 18%FIRST FREE METHODIST CHURCH: $15k → 18%SAGINAW TOWNSHIP: $10k → 18%SAINT DEMETRIOS CHURCH: $2k → 18%SAGINAW BAY SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA: $5k → 18%EASTSIDE SOUP KITCHEN: $5k → 18%COMMUNITY BAPTIST CHURCH: $2k → 18%CITY RESCUE MISSION: $3k → 18%SVSU: $15k → 18%ASCENSION FIELD NEUROSCIENCE INSTITUTE: $10k → 18%SAINT JOHN PAUL II: $5k → 18%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its field
04the grantee network

6 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 6 of the 19 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
3
Early backer (in before they grew)
6/6
Grantees still filing
6/6
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

SAGINAW VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION: $260,000 · EducationSAGINAW VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATIONSpring Arbor University: $50,000 · EducationSpring Arbor UniversityVALLEY LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOL: $50,000 · OtherVALLEY LUTHERAN HIGH SCHOOLCMU: $25,000 · OtherCMUSVSU: $15,000 · OtherSVSUFIRST FREE METHODIST CHURCH: $15,000 · OtherFIRST FREE METHODIST CHURCHBETHLEHEM LUTHERAN CHURCH: $15,000 · OtherBETHLEHEM LUTHERAN CHURCHIndividual grant recipient: $13,380 · OtherIndividual grant recipientASCENSION FIELD NEUROSCIENCE INSTITUTE: $10,000 · OtherASCENSION FIELD NEUROSCIENCE INST…Individual grant recipient: $10,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipient+6 more: $21,620 · Other+6 moreFIELD NEUROSCIENCES INSTITUTE: $95,000 · HealthFIELD NEUROSCIENCE…TEMPLEARTS: $5,000 · Arts & CultureMID-MICHIGAN CHILDREN'S MUSEUM: $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Education$310,000Other$175,000Health$95,000Arts & Culture$10,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetFIELD NEUROSCIENCES INSTITUTE: $95,000 over 2y, 18% of budgetSpring Arbor University: $50,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds SAGINAW VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds FIELD NEUROSCIENCES INSTITUTE ↗
  • Who funds Spring Arbor University ↗
  • Who funds TEMPLEARTS ↗
  • Who funds East Side Soup Kitchen ↗
  • Who funds MID-MICHIGAN CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Saginaw Community FoundationMI17.8× affinity6 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Saginaw Community Foundation · Consumers Energy Foundation · Wallace & Irene Bronner Family Charitable Foundation · Waheed and Raana Akbar Waqf Foundation · Harvey Randall Wickes Foundation · Boutell Memorial Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Malcolm and Lois Field Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Malcolm and Lois Field Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%1%5%11%20%funder's share of their income ↑0%4%8%11%15%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–15%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    04Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Malcolm and Lois Field Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Malcolm and Lois Field Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 19 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Malcolm and Lois Field’s filings →

    More from the funding graph