· Private foundation
Harvey Randall Wickes Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.
What you funded, over time
By grantee IRS cause code (NTEE).
A cause breakdown isn’t shown here: 54% of HARVEY RANDALL WICKES FOUNDATION’s grantee dollars fall outside its nine largest cause areas, whether because the recipient carries no IRS cause code or because its cause sits in the long tail. A chart would be mostly one residual band and misrepresent the portfolio.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
The 35 grants below total $1,654,300 — the rows itemised in this filing. The $2,182,300 headline is the total grant expense reported on the return, so the remaining $528,000 is giving the schedule does not break out: grants under the $5,000 itemisation floor, grants to individuals, and grants reported on other schedules. Every figure below describes the itemised rows only.
By grant size · FY2024
- Under $10k21 grants · $108k
- $10k–50k8 grants · $150k
- $50k–250k4 grants · $480k
- $250k+2 grants · $917k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| CENTRAL MICHIGAN UNIVERSITY COLLEGE OF MEDICINE | $500,000 |
| TEMPLE ARTS | $417,000 |
| SCF-SHINE BRIGHT SAGINAW MURAL | $200,000 |
| RESCUE MINISTRIES OF MID-MICHIGAN | $125,000 |
| SVSU - COLLEGE OF HEALTH AND HUMAN | $79,500 |
| SAGINAW FUTURE, INC. | $75,000 |
| LIFE CLINIC COMMUNITY RESOURCES | $25,000 |
| MIDLAND CENTER FOR THE ARTS | $25,000 |
| SAGINAW BAY SYMPHONY ORCHESTRA | $20,000 |
| DELTA COLLEGE FOUNDATION | $20,000 |
| SAGINAW VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY | $20,000 |
| JUNIOR ACHIEVEMENT OF NORTH CENTRAL, MI | $15,000 |
| WELLSPRING LUTHERAN SERVICES | $15,000 |
| SAGINAW BASIN LAND CONSERVANCY | $10,000 |
| COUNCIL OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATIONS | $8,000 |
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +3% since the first grant, against -19% for the ones you funded once.
30 repeat relationships — 26 still active in FY2024, 4 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2024, 81% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $313k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TTEMPLEARTS3× · 2022–2024 · $1.3M · revenue +22%
- GLGreat Lakes Bay Health Centers2× · 2022–2023 · $140k · revenue +60%
- DCDELTA COLLEGE FOUNDATION3× · 2022–2024 · $60k · revenue +46%
Funded once
- SCSAGINAW COMMUNITY FOOD CLUBone grant, 2023 · $333k
- CHCOVENANT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATIONone grant, 2022 · $167k · revenue -19%
- FWFirst Ward Community Servicegraduatedone grant, 2022 · $103k · revenue +32%
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To be a catalyst for economic and community progress within the great lakes bay region.
Mid michigan community action guides local residents on the path to self-sufficiency through empowerment, education and community enrichment.
To provide high quality community-oriented, patient-centered health services for all.
Catholic Social Services of Washtenaw County D/B/A Catholic Charities Washtenaw County provides diverse, holistic social services including adoption and pregnancy counseling, food and basic needs assistance, domestic and child abuse…
Support library activities through materials and services
The Center's mission is to inspire, entertain, educate, and serve all in Northern Michigan year-round by presenting exceptional experiences across the full spectrum of the performing arts and offering impactful educational opportunities.
Our mission is conserving West Michigans ecologically critical land. We protect land by creating public nature preserves, providing support to communities and local governments in creating natural areas, and helping private landowners…
To provide personal and compassionate support to cancer patients and their caregivers in our community.
The michigan christian home dba beacon hill at eastgate, a not-for-profit corporation, provides housing and health services in a christian environment for older adults, thus enabling them to meet their ongoing physical, social and…
The mission of michigan community capital is to facilitate low-income community investment in michigan. these investments will spur job creation and economic growth in low income communities across the state.
Michigan Family Resources mission is to deliver holistic family-centered services to children that promote their well-being and development.
Assisting the community mental health boards of michigan in developing methods for mental health planning, care and treatment.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Saginaw County Community Action Committee Inc and the most unlike its peers is Major Chords for Minors. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 49 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 12% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
28 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 28 of the 57 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TEMPLEARTS ↗
- Who funds Rescue Ministries of Mid-Michigan ↗
- Who funds SAGINAW FUTURE INC ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HEALTHCARE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Great Lakes Bay Health Centers ↗
- Who funds First Ward Community Service ↗
- Who funds HOLY CROSS SERVICES INC ↗
- Who funds DELTA COLLEGE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Midland Center for the Arts Inc ↗
- Who funds LIFECLINIC COMMUNITY RESOURCES ↗
- Who funds SAGINAW BASIN LAND CONSERVANCY ↗
- Who funds MISSION IN THE CITY ↗
- Who funds MID-MICHIGAN CHILDREN'S MUSEUM ↗
- Who funds COUNCIL OF MICHIGAN FOUNDATIONS ↗
- Who funds SAGINAW CHORAL SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds SAGINAW VALLEY STATE UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds CHESANING AREA EMERGENCY RELIEF ↗
- Who funds Michigan Colleges Alliance ↗
- Who funds LUTHERAN CHILD & FAMILY SERVICE OF MICHIGAN INC ↗
- Who funds CITIZENS RESEARCH COUNCIL OF MICHIGAN INC ↗
- Who funds East Side Soup Kitchen ↗
- Who funds EMMAUS HOUSE OF SAGINAW INC ↗
- Who funds THE DIAPER ALLIANCE INC ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Saginaw Community Foundation · Allen E & Marie A Nickless Memorial Foundation · Wickson-Link Memorial Foundation · Consumers Energy Foundation · Frank N Andersen Foundation · Wallace & Irene Bronner Family Charitable Foundation · Boutell Memorial Fund · Morley Foundation · Alice E Turner Memorial Trust · Wm McNally Family Foundation · Harvey Memorial Foundation · Yeo Family Foundation
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus
How do I get to Harvey Randall Wickes Foundation?
Find your warmest path to Harvey Randall Wickes Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.
Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.