· Private foundation
The Magis Charitable Foundation
Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.
What you funded, over time
Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY2017–2025.
Where the money goes
Your grants by size, and where they go.
By grant size · FY2025
- Under $10k15 grants · $38k
- $10k–50k2 grants · $58k
- $50k–250k2 grants · $255k
| Recipient | Amount |
|---|---|
| BARNABAS CENTER INCORPORATED | $205,000 |
| TRUSTEES OF THE COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CROSS | $50,000 |
| COME TO BELIEVE FOUNDATION | $35,000 |
| CARE 2 COMMUNITIES INC | $23,000 |
| AMELIA TREE CONSERVANCY INC | $6,000 |
| LE MOYNE COLLEGE | $5,000 |
| JOY TO THE CHILDREN INC | $3,000 |
| IGNATIAN LAY VOLUNTEER CORPS | $3,000 |
| FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION IN | $3,000 |
| SISTERS OF LIFE | $3,000 |
| JESUIT VOLUNTEERS | $3,000 |
| DIOCESE OF ST AUGUSTINE | $2,000 |
| THE FISTULA FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
| NASSAU HUMANE SOCIETY INC | $2,000 |
| DRIVEN FOUNDATION | $2,000 |
Do your dollars go where the need is?
Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.
Your human-services grants (FY17–24, $214k) land where the poverty rate runs at 17%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.
Which US states your grants reach
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.
Who you back again
Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.
And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +29% since the first grant, against +21% for the ones you funded once.
25 repeat relationships — 12 still active in FY2025, 13 since wound down; 7 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).
How the two cohorts compare
Organizations
Total granted
Median revenue growth · since first grant
Still filing today
New vs renewed · share of each year
In FY2025, 96% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $15k went to new ones.
Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant
First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.
Backed again, and grew
- TOTRUSTEES OF THE COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CROSS9× · 2017–2025 · $1.7M · revenue +44%
- BCBARNABAS CENTER INC6× · 2020–2025 · $325k · revenue +76%
- CHCOVENANT HOUSE8× · 2017–2024 · $194k · revenue +34%
Funded once
- CRCOMIC RELIEF INC DBA COMIC RELIEF USone grant, 2019 · $100k · revenue -81%
- MLMARYKNOLL LAY MISSIONERS FOUNDATIONone grant, 2024 · $15k
- SVST VINCENTS ACADEMYone grant, 2024 · $7k
Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.
The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.
To provide multi-specialty surgical care, humanitarian aid and educational support to people in low- and middle-income countries.
The University of New Haven is a student-centered comprehensive university with an emphasis on excellence in liberal arts and professional education. Our mission is to prepare our students to lead purposeful and fulfilling lives in a…
Our mission is to create a fair and inclusive economy where underserved people have quality financial choices and opportunities to improve their economic well-being. we find and help build innovative companies with the potential to reach…
Fordham university, the jesuit university of new york, is committed to the discovery of wisdom and the transmission of learning, through research and through education of the highest quality. for more information, see schedule o.
Saint xavier university, a catholic institution inspired by the heritage of the sisters of mercy, educates persons to search for truth, think critically, communicate effectively and serve wisely and compassionately in support of human…
The common application is a not-for-profit membership organization of over 1,100 colleges and universities across the globe committed to access, equity, and integrity in the college admission process. every year, over 1.5 million students…
The organization's mission is to build partnerships to enhance compassionate care globally. we are dedicated to improving access to hospice and palliative care worldwide.
Jewish family and children's service of minneapolis provides essential services to people of all ages and backgrounds to sustain healthy relationships, ease suffering and offer support in times of need.
(see schedule o)
The national council of jewish women is a grassroots nonpartisan organization of volunteers and advocates who strive for social justice by improving the quality of life for women, children and families.
World vision, inc. is a christian humanitarian organization dedicated to working with children, families, and their communities worldwide to reach their full potential by tackling the causes of poverty and injustice. (continued on schedule…
Dedicated to the early detection and prevention of cervical cancer around the globe for the women who need it most.
For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Comic Relief Inc Dba Comic Relief Us and the most unlike its peers is The Caddie School for Soldiers. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.
Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.
Your grantees are a median of 27 years old; the field is 17. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.
The field is 20% startups (under 5 years old) — 4% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.
The orgs you fund almost never close — 0.0% lost their exemption, against 11% of the field you don’t fund.
Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.
48 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.
Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.
Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 2017–2025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 48 of the 62 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.
Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee
Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them
A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.
- Who funds TRUSTEES OF THE COLLEGE OF THE HOLY CROSS ↗
- Who funds BARNABAS CENTER INC ↗
- Who funds COVENANT HOUSE ↗
- Who funds JESUIT VOLUNTEERS ↗
- Who funds PIVOT WORKS INC ↗
- Who funds COME TO BELIEVE FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds COMIC RELIEF INC DBA COMIC RELIEF US ↗
- Who funds CARE 2 COMMUNITIES FKA CONTAINERS TO CLINICS INC ↗
- Who funds LOYOLA UNIVERSITY OF CHICAGO ↗
- Who funds ROOT CAPITAL INC ↗
- Who funds Ignatian Lay Volunteer Corporation ↗
- Who funds THE FOSTER CLOSET CORP ↗
- Who funds Le Moyne College ↗
- Who funds DIVINE MERCY MINISTRIES INC ↗
- Who funds FOUNDATION FOR INDIVIDUAL RIGHTS AND EXPRESSION INC ↗
- Who funds THE US CONSTITUTION SCHOLARSHIP FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds The Fistula Foundation ↗
- Who funds ALL AFRICA CONFERENCE - SISTER TO SISTER INC ↗
- Who funds AMELIA TREE CONSERVANCY INC ↗
- Who funds KINO BORDER INITIATIVE INC ↗
- Who funds GLOBAL POVERTY PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds EQUAL JUSTICE INITIATIVE ↗
- Who funds JOY TO THE CHILDREN INC ↗
- Who funds NATIVITY SCHOOL OF WORCESTER INC ↗
- Who funds THRIVE FOR LIFE PRISON PROJECT INC ↗
- Who funds NASSAU HUMANE SOCIETY INC ↗
- Who funds GRASSROOTS HEALTH ↗
- Who funds DRUG ENFORCEMENT ADMINISTRATION SURVIVOR ↗
- Who funds COCKTAILS & CAREGIVERS FOUNDATION INC ↗
- Who funds THE DRIVEN FOUNDATION ↗
- Who funds Special Operations Fund ↗
The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.
Open a dossier: Rose M & Robert W Stubbs Foundation · The Bessemer Giving Fund · Boston Foundation Inc · Community Foundation of New Jersey · The Goldman Sachs Charitable Gift Fund · The Burroughs Family Foundation · The Rayonier Advanced Materials Foundation Inc · National Philanthropic Trust · Raskob Foundation for Catholic Activities Inc · Chubb Charitable Foundation · Catholic Community Foundation of Minnesota · The Community Foundation for Northeast Florida Inc
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.
Government reliance of your grantees
Every dot is one organization The Magis Charitable Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.
- Root Capital Inc — 9% of income from government
- Domus Kids Inc — 7% of income from government
- Covenant House Florida Inc — 1% of income from government
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.