Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Magee Foundation

Its FY2020 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$101k
Granted FY2019
31
Grants FY2019
2
States reached
$8k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

96% of The Magee Foundation’s FY2020 grant dollars went to Community Giving Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2020 names 11 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it. Everything below is therefore FY2019, the last year The Magee Foundation named its own grantees at scale: 11 organizations, $101k. It is dated, not current.

Organizations named directly on the return

11
’17
12
’18
11
’19
11
’20

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0181% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2017 to 2020.

Philanthropy$2.3MHuman Services$73kEducation$64kPublic Safety & Disaster$56kHealth$34kArts & Culture$29kRecreation & Sports$24kYouth Development$22kOther$0
02FY2019 · 31 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

$3,000
Median grant
2
States reached
$0
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
AMERICAN RED CROSS$8,000
BLOOMSBURG PUBLIC LIBRARY$6,000
GEISINGER COLUMBIA MONTOUR HOSPICE$6,000
AGAPE LOVE FROM ABOVE$5,000
BLOOMSBURG FIRE DEPARTMENT$5,000
BRIGHTER CHRISTMAS FUND$5,000
COLUMBIA COUNTY TRAVELING LIBRARY$5,000
Individual grant recipient$5,000
CAMP VICTORY$5,000
VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE$4,000
CHILDRENS MUSEUM$4,000
THE WOMENS CENTER$4,000
SALVATION ARMY$3,500
RONALD MCDONALD HOUSE$3,000
GIRL SCOUTS IN THE HEART OF PA$3,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY17–20, $12k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 13%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 13%YMCA: $3k → 14%YMCA: $3k → 14%YMCA: $3k → 14%YMCA: $3k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

99%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$394k · 31 repeat orgs$2k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +16% since the first grant, against -2% for those funded once.

31 repeat relationships: 31 still active in FY2019, 0 since wound down. Read against FY2019, the last year this funder named its own grantees directly; its giving has since run through a sponsor, which reports no donor behind each grant.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

31
1

Total granted

$394k
$2k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+16%
-2%

Still filing today

35%
100%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2020, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20
Arts & CultureAnimalsPublic Safety & DisasterHuman ServicesYouth DevelopmentEducationOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • BP
    BLOOMSBURG PUBLIC LIBRARY
    4× · 2017–2020 · $24k · revenue +16%
  • NW
    NICHOLAS WOLFF FOUNDATIONINC
    4× · 2017–2020 · $20k · revenue +4%
  • TW
    THE WOMEN'S CENTER
    4× · 2017–2020 · $15k · revenue +22%

Funded once

  • BT
    BLOOMSBURG THEATRE ENSEMBLE INC
    one grant, 2018 · $2k · revenue -2%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
North Pocono Public Library

Public lending library

—
2
Valley Community Library

Public lending library

—
3
Carbondale Public Library

Public lending library

—
4
Pike County Public Library Inc

Provides free library services to residents of pike county, pennsylvania

—
5
Cambria Library Association

Public library services

—
6
Scranton Public Library

Public lending library

—
7
Pittsburgh Community Broadcasting Corporation

To create and distribute trusted content, build connections and strengthen our community through public media.

Arts & Culture
8
Bethlehem Area Public Library

To provide educational, informational, cultural, and recreational services to the public. services are provided in bethlehem, pennsylvania and its supporting communities.

Education
9
Taylor Community Library Association

Public lending library

—
10
Abington Community Library Association

Public lending library

—
11
Humane Pennsylvania

Humane pennsylvania empowers the people in our communities to increase their capacity to care for animals so that all animals are healthy, safe, and treated humanely.

Animals
12
Eastern Monroe Public Library

To provide, maintain, operate and support a free public library in monroe county, pa

—
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Women's Center; the most unlike its peers is Bloomsburg Fire Department Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 33 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
2
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
9/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

COMMUNITY GIVING FOUNDATION: $2,292,881 · PhilanthropyCOMMUNITY GIVING FOUNDATIONAMERICAN RED CROSS: $36,000 · OtherAMERICAN RE…COLUMBIA COUNTY TRAVELING LIBRARY: $20,000 · OtherCOLUMBIA CO…Individual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual …NICHOLAS WOLFF FOUNDATIONINC: $20,000 · OtherNICHOLAS WO…BRIGHTER CHRISTMAS FUND: $20,000 · OtherBRIGHTER CH…GEISINGER COLUMBIA MONTOUR HOSPICE: $18,000 · OtherGEISINGER C…AGAPE LOVE FROM ABOVE: $17,000 · OtherAGAPE LOVE …VOLUNTEERS IN MEDICINE: $15,500 · OtherVOLUNTEERS …THE WOMEN'S CENTER: $15,000 · OtherTHE WOMEN'S…SALVATION ARMY: $14,000 · OtherRONALD MCDONALD HOUSE: $12,000 · OtherPARTNERS IN COLUMBIA COUNTY: $12,000 · OtherBIG BROTHERS BIG SISTERS: $9,500 · Other+9 more: $46,000 · Other+9 moreBLOOMSBURG PUBLIC LIBRARY: $24,000 · Arts & CultureTHE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $15,000 · Arts & CultureNORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA EDUCATIONAL TELEVISION ASSOCIATION: $12,000 · Arts & CultureBLOOMSBURG THEATRE ENSEMBLE INC: $2,000 · Arts & CultureBLOOMSBURG FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $20,000 · Public Safety & DisasterYMCA OF THE ROSES: $12,000 · Human ServicesGIRL SCOUTS IN THE HEART OF PA: $12,000 · Youth DevelopmentCOLUMBIA CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM: $12,000 · EducationPA PETS INC: $8,000 · AnimalsANIMAL RESOURCE CENTER: $4,000 · Animals
Philanthropy$2,292,881Other$275,000Arts & Culture$53,000Public Safety & Disaster$20,000Human Services$12,000Youth Development$12,000Education$12,000Animals$12,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetCOMMUNITY GIVING FOUNDATION: $2,292,881 over 1y, 36% of budgetBLOOMSBURG PUBLIC LIBRARY: $24,000 over 4y, 1.8% of budgetBLOOMSBURG FIRE DEPARTMENT INC: $20,000 over 4y, 3.0% of budgetNICHOLAS WOLFF FOUNDATIONINC: $20,000 over 4y, 0.9% of budgetTHE WOMEN'S CENTER: $15,000 over 4y, 0.4% of budgetTHE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC: $15,000 over 4y, 2.2% of budgetYMCA OF THE ROSES: $12,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetNORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA EDUCATIONAL TELEVISION ASSOCIATION: $12,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetGIRL SCOUTS IN THE HEART OF PA: $12,000 over 4y, 0.0% of budgetCOLUMBIA CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM: $12,000 over 4y, 0.1% of budgetPA PETS INC: $8,000 over 4y, 2.4% of budgetANIMAL RESOURCE CENTER: $4,000 over 4y, 0.3% of budgetBLOOMSBURG THEATRE ENSEMBLE INC: $2,000 over 1y, 0.3% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds COMMUNITY GIVING FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds BLOOMSBURG PUBLIC LIBRARY ↗
  • Who funds BLOOMSBURG FIRE DEPARTMENT INC ↗
  • Who funds NICHOLAS WOLFF FOUNDATIONINC ↗
  • Who funds THE WOMEN'S CENTER ↗
  • Who funds THE CHILDREN'S MUSEUM INC ↗
  • Who funds YMCA OF THE ROSES ↗
  • Who funds NORTHEASTERN PENNSYLVANIA EDUCATIONAL TELEVISION ASSOCIATION ↗
  • Who funds GIRL SCOUTS IN THE HEART OF PA ↗
  • Who funds COLUMBIA CHILD DEVELOPMENT PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds PA PETS INC ↗
  • Who funds ANIMAL RESOURCE CENTER ↗
  • Who funds BLOOMSBURG THEATRE ENSEMBLE INC ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Community Giving FoundationPA26.2× affinity10 shared granteesties to 9 of 9Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Community Giving Foundation · First Community Foundation Partnership of Pennsylvania · United Way of Columbia and Montour County · Ppl Foundation · Bloomsburg Area Community Foundation · Susquehanna Valley United Way · Geisinger Health · The 1994 Charles B Degenstein Fdn · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Magee Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Magee Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%3%10%23%40%funder's share of their income ↑0%19%38%56%75%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    7report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–75%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.
    05Through Plinth

    Warm introductions · Powered by PlinthPlus

    How do I get to The Magee Foundation?

    Find your warmest path to The Magee Foundation through trustees and officers whose names appear on both boards. Search for your organization and Plinth traces the shortest route it can evidence.

    Each link is a name appearing on two organizations’ public IRS 990 filings, matched on that name and, where the filings support it, on location. A same-state match has geographic support, which is a second matching feature rather than confirmation that the two are one person; a cross-state one is the likeliest to be two people who share a name. Every hop shows its tier, low-confidence and distant paths are held back rather than guessed, and it is worth confirming the person before you use the introduction.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 33 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2019, released 2019. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Magee’s filings →

    More from the funding graph