Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Maddox Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it accepted unsolicited grant applications.

$53k
Granted FY2025still arriving
8
Grants FY2025still arriving
3
States reached
$10k
Largest
01What it funds
0192% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2018 to 2025.

Health$118kYouth Development$67kReligion$49kEducation$48kArts & Culture$15kHuman Services$15kSocial Science$10kFood & Nutrition$10kOther$0
02FY2025 · 8 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k5 grants · $23k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $30k
$6,500
Median grant
3
States reached
$914k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE SHEPHERD CENTER FOUNDATION$10,000
WHISPERING ANGELS YOUTH RANCH$10,000
GEORGIA TECH$10,000
DRUG AWARENESS INC$6,500
AUDITORY - VERBAL CENTER INC$5,000
COLLEGIUM VOCALE$5,000
FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH OF DECATUR$5,000
ONE MIND INSTITUTE$1,500
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Dollar for dollar, its grants (FY18–25) land where the poverty rate runs at 13%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 92% of its dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of its grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%FOUNDATION FOR INNER PEACE: $5k → 8%THE CYPRESS INITIATIVE: $5k → 13%BALANCED INC: $5k → 14%THE INSIGHT ALLIANCE: $5k → 4%CENTER FOR AWAKENING: $5k → 10%SISU OF GEORGIA INC: $10k → 12%ALEXANDER THARPE FUND: $5k → 13%FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH OF DECATUR: $10k → 14%DRUG AWARENESS INC: $8k → 17%ONE SOLUTION FOUNDATION: $5k → 14%THE CYPRESS INITIATIVE: $5k → 13%BALANCED INC: $5k → 14%THE INSIGHT ALLIANCE: $5k → 4%CENTER FOR AWAKENING: $5k → 10%SISU OF GEORGIA INC: $5k → 12%FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH OF DECATUR: $5k → 14%DRUG AWARENESS INC: $7k → 17%THE SPARK INITIATIVE: $5k → 13%WHISPERING ANGELS YOUTH RANCH: $15k → 12%YMCA OF METROPOLITAIN ATLANTA: $5k → 14%DRUG AWARENESS INC: $7k → 17%WHISPERING ANGELS YOUTH RANCH: $10k → 12%THE SHEPHERD CENTER FOUNDATION: $10k → 13%FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH OF DECATUR: $5k → 14%DRUG AWARENESS INC: $5k → 17%J'S PLACE: $10k → 12%WOMEN ALONE TOGETHER: $5k → 13%FIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH OF DECATUR: $5k → 14%WHISPERING ANGELS YOUTH RANCH: $10k → 12%THE SHEPHERD CENTER FOUNDATION: $5k → 13%WHISPERING ANGELS YOUTH RANCH: $7k → 12%WOMEN ALONE TOGETHER: $5k → 13%WHISPERING ANGELS YOUTH RANCH: $5k → 12%THE SHEPHERD CENTER FOUNDATION: $5k → 13%AUDITORY - VERBAL CENTER INC: $5k → 14%WHISPERING ANGELS YOUTH RANCH: $5k → 12%WOMEN ALONE TOGETHER: $5k → 13%AUDITORY - VERBAL CENTER INC: $5k → 14%WHISPERING ANGELS YOUTH RANCH: $5k → 12%WOMEN ALONE TOGETHER: $5k → 13%AUDITORY - VERBAL CENTER INC: $5k → 14%WHISPERING ANGELS YOUTH RANCH: $5k → 12%GEORGIA TECH: $10k → 13%AUDITORY - VERBAL CENTER INC: $5k → 14%GEORGIA TECH SUPPORT THE SWARM: $6k → 13%AUDITORY - VERBAL CENTER INC: $5k → 14%GEORGIA TECH SUPPORT THE SWARM: $5k → 13%AUDITORY - VERBAL CENTER INC: $5k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

NH
IL
NY
OH
CA
KS
TN
GA
FL
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

86%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$311k · 16 repeat orgs$50k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +108% since the first grant, against +83% for those funded once.

16 repeat relationships: 6 still active in FY2025, 10 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

16
10

Total granted

$311k
$43k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+108%
+83%

Still filing today

38%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 88% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $7k went to new ones.

50%100%’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthYouth DevelopmentPhilanthropyFood & NutritionArts & CultureOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • AV
    AUDITORY VERBAL CENTER INC
    8× · 2018–2025 · $40k · revenue +25%
  • SC
    SHEPHERD CENTER FOUNDATION INC
    3× · 2018–2025 · $20k · revenue ×15 · 51% of their budget
  • SO
    SISU OF GEORGIA INC
    2× · 2018–2019 · $15k · revenue +24%

Funded once

  • JP
    J'S PLACE
    one grant, 2023 · $10k
  • OS
    One Solution Foundation Incgraduated
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue +156%
  • PH
    Piedmont Healthcare Foundation Inc
    one grant, 2019 · $5k · revenue -43%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Lieber Institute Inc

The mission of the institute is to translate basic genetic and molecular mechanisms of schizophrenia and related developmental brain disorders into clinical advances that change the lives of affected individuals. it is catalyzing a new…

Health
2
Inseparable Inc

Inseparable Inc is focused on creating a world where mental health is treated as a critical and equal piece of overall health, and where systems are designed with their impact on mental health in mind. Inseparable, Inc. is a growing…

Health
3
Centerstone of Tennessee Inc

Our mission is "delivering care that changes people's lives"

Health
4
Nonduality Institute Inc

The mission of the Nonduality Institute is to advance scientific understanding of nonduality through conducting research into neural signatures of nondual awareness and its effects on cognitive, affective and perceptual…

Health
5
Trihealth Physician Institute

Provides the community necessary medical care through specialty physicians.

Health
6
Teamability Inc

Teamability strives to ensure that children with severe multiple disabilities have the opportunity to benefit from therapeautic educational intervention to participate actively in life.

Education
7
Semler Institute for Stress Management Research and Education
Health
8
Ackerman Institute for the Family

The institute is dedicated to the study, diagnosis and treatment of family relationship problems

Health
9
Head Strong Project Inc

The head strong project (headstrong) is a non-profit organization founded in 2012 that provides barrier-free, stigma-free ptsd treatment to veterans, transitioning service members, and family members connected to their care.

Health
10
Centerstone Research Institute Inc

Our mission is "delivering care that changes people's lives"

Health
11
Institute for Children's Mental Disorders
Philanthropy
12
Centerstone Foundation

Our mission is to "deliver care that changes people's lives"

Health
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Shepherd Center Foundation Inc; the most unlike its peers is Collegium Vocale Inc. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2025, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 28 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

1
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
5
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
9/12
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

AUDITORY VERBAL CENTER INC: $40,000 · OtherAUDITORY VERBAL CENTER INCFIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH OF DECATUR: $29,000 · OtherFIRST CHRISTIAN CHURCH OF DECATURDRUG AWARENESS INC: $26,500 · OtherDRUG AWARENESS INCIndividual grant recipient: $20,000 · OtherIndividual grant recipientGEORGIA TECH: $15,000 · OtherGEORGIA TECHSISU OF GEORGIA INC: $15,000 · OtherSISU OF GEORGIA INCSAINT ANNE'S DAY SCHOOL AND ENRICHMENT PROGRAMS: $13,000 · OtherSAINT ANNE'S DAY SCHOOL AND ENRICHMENT PROGRAMSGEORGIA TECH SUPPORT THE SWARM: $11,000 · OtherJ'S PLACE: $10,000 · OtherCENTER FOR AWAKENING: $10,000 · OtherDEKALB CHORAL GUILD INC: $10,000 · OtherTHE INSIGHT ALLIANCE: $10,000 · OtherALEXANDER THARPE FUND: $9,000 · Other+6 more: $19,500 · Other+6 moreWHISPERING ANGELS YOUTH RANCH INC: $62,000 · Youth DevelopmentWHISPERING ANGELS Y…SHEPHERD CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 · PhilanthropyTHE CYPRESS INITIATIVE INC: $10,000 · EducationOne Solution Foundation Inc: $5,000 · EducationSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $3,500 · EducationBALANCED INC: $10,000 · Food & NutritionPiedmont Healthcare Foundation Inc: $5,000 · HealthONE MIND: $1,500 · HealthCOLLEGIUM VOCALE INC: $5,000 · Arts & Culture
Other$238,000Youth Development$62,000Philanthropy$20,000Education$18,500Food & Nutrition$10,000Health$6,500Arts & Culture$5,000

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetWHISPERING ANGELS YOUTH RANCH INC: $62,000 over 8y, 6.6% of budgetAUDITORY VERBAL CENTER INC: $40,000 over 8y, 0.4% of budgetSHEPHERD CENTER FOUNDATION INC: $20,000 over 3y, 51% of budgetSISU OF GEORGIA INC: $15,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetBALANCED INC: $10,000 over 2y, 1.1% of budgetTHE CYPRESS INITIATIVE INC: $10,000 over 2y, 1.3% of budgetOne Solution Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 2.6% of budgetPiedmont Healthcare Foundation Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCOLLEGIUM VOCALE INC: $5,000 over 1y, 15% of budgetFoundation for Inner Peace Inc: $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetSTEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION: $3,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds WHISPERING ANGELS YOUTH RANCH INC ↗
  • Who funds AUDITORY VERBAL CENTER INC ↗
  • Who funds SHEPHERD CENTER FOUNDATION INC ↗
  • Who funds SISU OF GEORGIA INC ↗
  • Who funds BALANCED INC ↗
  • Who funds THE CYPRESS INITIATIVE INC ↗
  • Who funds One Solution Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds Piedmont Healthcare Foundation Inc ↗
  • Who funds COLLEGIUM VOCALE INC ↗
  • Who funds Foundation for Inner Peace Inc ↗
  • Who funds STEPHEN SILLER TUNNEL TO TOWERS FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds ONE MIND ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Paypal Charitable Giving FundDC8.9× affinity5 shared granteesties to 5 of 5Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Paypal Charitable Giving Fund · Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · National Philanthropic Trust · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Maddox Family Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Maddox Family Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%4%15%34%60%funder's share of their income ↑0%1%3%4%5%share of the org’s income from government →
    no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
    0get no government money at all
    3report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
    0rely on government for over half their income
    ⤢ axis zoomed · 0–5%
    typical government reliance, FY20–25
    How this is measured
    Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

    On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 28 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

    How this is measured
    Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

    Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

    Source object · view filing

    Play a game based on Maddox Family’s filings →

    More from the funding graph