Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Mackowski Family Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$61k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$30k
Largest
01What you fund
01100% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20172025.

Arts & Culture$195kFood & Nutrition$101kEnvironment$44kInternational$41kEducation$41kPhilanthropy$11kRecreation & Sports$7kAnimals$5kOther$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k3 grants · $11k
  • $10k–50k2 grants · $50k
$6,700
Median grant
4
States reached
$485k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
THE SOUND WALL MUSIC INITIATIVE$30,000
SAN FRANCISCO MUSIC ASSOCIATION$20,000
WORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL$6,700
CENTER FOR A NEW AMERICAN SECURITY$2,500
GARDEN CLUB OF JACKSONVILLE$1,500
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY20–20, $1k) land where the poverty rate runs at 14%, against an area that typically sits at 11%. 100% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Most of your grants land in higher-need ZIPs.

area typical 11%DELORES BARR WEAVER POLICY CENTER: $1k → 14%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

ID
NY
CA
KY
NC
DC
AL
FL

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

88%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$394k · 17 repeat orgs$55k to everyone else

17 repeat relationships — 3 still active in FY2025, 14 since wound down; 2 grantees were first funded in FY2025 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

17
14

Total granted

$394k
$33k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+50%
+64%

Still filing today

82%
71%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 63% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $23k went to new ones.

50%100%’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’17’18’19’20’21’22’23’24’25
Arts & CultureEnvironmentEducationPhilanthropyFood & NutritionReligionOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • SM
    SOUNDWALL MUSIC INITIATIVE
    4× · 2022–2025 · $83k · revenue +74%
  • FB
    FOOD BANK OF EAST ALABAMA INC
    6× · 2017–2023 · $65k · revenue +46%
  • DE
    DE ETTE HOLDEN CUMMER MUSEUM FOUNDATION
    6× · 2017–2024 · $50k · revenue +67%

Funded once

  • WG
    WOMEN'S GIVING ALLIANCE
    one grant, 2022 · $5k
  • FR
    FOOD RUNNERS
    one grant, 2020 · $5k · revenue -99%
  • AK
    AUBURN KNIGHTS ALUMNI ASSOCIATION
    one grant, 2019 · $5k

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Library Foundation of Jacksonville Inc

The mission of the Jacksonville Public Library Foundation is to provide private support and public visibility for the Jacksonville Public Library.

Education
2
Jacksonville Symphony Association Inc

To present artistically excellent classical and other orchestral performances for the enjoyment, education and enrichment of an ever-increasing diverse audience, while maintaining fiscal integrity.

Arts & Culture
3
Nashville Food Project Inc

The nashville food project brings people together to grow, cook, and share nourishing food, with the goals of cultivating community and alleviating hunger in our city.

Food & Nutrition
4
Grow Jackson

To empower the community through gardens, fresh food access, and eduction. instead of just growing food and giving it away, we also are teaching young people how to grow food, teaching them why fresh food is important for them and their…

Food & Nutrition
5
Regional Food Bank of Northeast Florida Inc

Feeding Northeast Florida works to permanently end hunger in Northeast Florida by providing nutritious foods and other essential goods to people facing hunger, by addressing food insecurity, poverty and poor health through education and…

Food & Nutrition
6
Biscayne Bay Waterkeeper Inc

In 2024, biscayne bay waterkeeper (d/b/a miami waterkeeper) built on our reputation by navigating challenges, seizing opportunities, and continuing our unwavering commitment to safeguarding our precious waterways and finding local…

Environment
7
Community Greening Corp

Community greening envisions an engaged community creating sustainable green spaces and a vibrant tree canopy to equitably strengthen our environment, economy, society and health.community greening is a community-based organization that…

Environment
8
The James Beard Foundation Inc

The james beard foundation believes in a vibrant, equitable, and sustainable independent restaurant industry that stands as a cornerstone of american culture, community, and economy - and drives towards a better food system. the james…

9
Jefferson National Parks Association

Jefferson national parks association provides quality educational products and related services that enhance public understanding and appreciation of america's national parks, public lands and historic places.

Arts & Culture
10
Jacksonville Area Chamber of Commerce

To improve the business climate, promote economic development, and enhance the quality of life in the jacksonville area. the jacksonville area chamber of commerce encourages businesses by building relationships to create a vibrant tomorrow.

11
Florida State Parks Foundation Inc

Florida state parks foundation preserves, protects, sustains and grows florida state parks.

Recreation & Sports
12
Jenkins Arboretum & Gardens

The mission of the jenkins arboretum & gardens is to preserve natural, tranquil woodlands for community enjoyment, to showcase native plants and a world class collection of rhododendrons and azaleas, and to promote environmental…

Environment

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is The Community Foundation for Northeast Florida Inc and the most unlike its peers is The Jim and Tabitha Furyk Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

For each theme you fund, this compares how the sector’s money is shifting with how your own giving is shifting.

← shrinkinggrowing →↓ leaning in → pulling backsteadyClassical Music Performance…Jacksonville Community Deve…Community Health & Social S…San Francisco Civic Infrast…Contemporary Art Museums & …
the sector your giving your giving is ahead of the sector the sector’s ahead of you· dot size = how much the theme matters to each side
Ordered by the change in your giving — leaning in on top, pulling back at the bottom. The bar between the two dots is how out of step you are with the sector. Hover any row for detail.

Sector change and giving change are each shown relative to their own range, growing (right) or shrinking (left); both normalized, so inflation isn’t mistaken for growth.

Your grantees are a median of 34 years old; the field is 15. You back the established end — and your money leans older still.

THE FIELDby orgYOUR GRANTEESby number23%0%<5yr15%9%5–10yr18%23%10–20yr17%23%20–35yr13%32%35–55yr14%14%55yr+
THE FIELDby orgYOUR MONEYby value23%0%<5yr15%29%5–10yr18%2%10–20yr17%34%20–35yr13%28%35–55yr14%6%55yr+

The field is 23% startups (under 5 years old) — 0% of your grantees by number, and just 0% of your money.

Closures · last 5 years

The orgs you fund almost never close 0.0% lost their exemption, against 14% of the field you don’t fund.

orgs you fund
0.0%0/27
the rest of the field
14%
1,783/12,444

Age = years since IRS exemption (a founding proxy). “Closed” = auto-revocation for 3 years of non-filing — a floor on closure, not proof, and bigger established orgs lapse least. Association, not causation.

04the grantee network

26 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172026, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 26 of the 34 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
9
Early backer (in before they grew)
26/26
Grantees still filing
22/26
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

SOUNDWALL MUSIC INITIATIVE — $82,500 · Arts & CultureSOUNDWALL MUSIC INITIATIVEDE ETTE HOLDEN CUMMER MUSEUM FOUNDATION — $50,150 · Arts & CultureDE ETTE HOLDEN CUMMER MUSEUM FOUNDATIONCIVIC SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO — $30,000 · Arts & CultureCIVIC SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCONATIONAL OLDTIME FIDDLERS INC — $10,000 · Arts & CultureNATIONAL OLDTIME FIDDLERS INC+1 more — $1,650 · Arts & CultureFOOD BANK OF EAST ALABAMA INC — $65,000 · OtherFOOD BANK OF EAST ALABAMA INCWORLD AFFAIRS COUNCIL — $37,700 · OtherWORLD AFFAIRS COUNCILSAN FRANCISCO MUSIC ASSOCIATION — $20,000 · OtherSAN FRANCISCO MUSIC ASSOCIATION+12 more — $33,500 · Other+12 moreST JOHNS RIVERKEEPER INC — $20,200 · EnvironmentST JOHNS RI…THE GARDEN CLUB OF AMERICA — $10,900 · EnvironmentTHE GARDEN …Garden Club of Jacksonville Inc — $6,800 · EnvironmentGarden Club…GREENSCAPE OF JACKSONVILLE INC — $6,000 · EnvironmentGREENSCAPE …+1 more — $500 · EnvironmentAUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $36,750 · EducationAUBURN UN…+2 more — $1,250 · EducationMANNA FOOD BANK INC — $20,000 · Food & NutritionALABAMA SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE NETWORK — $5,000 · Food & NutritionTHE JIM AND TABITHA FURYK FOUNDATION — $5,300 · Philanthropy904WARD INC — $3,000 · PhilanthropyTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR NORTHEAST FLORIDA INC — $500 · PhilanthropyCenter for a New American Security Inc — $2,500 · International
Arts & Culture$174,300Other$156,200Environment$44,400Education$38,000Food & Nutrition$25,000Philanthropy$8,800International$2,500

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetSOUNDWALL MUSIC INITIATIVE — $82,500 over 4y, 9.4% of budgetFOOD BANK OF EAST ALABAMA INC — $65,000 over 6y, 0.2% of budgetDE ETTE HOLDEN CUMMER MUSEUM FOUNDATION — $50,150 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetAUBURN UNIVERSITY FOUNDATION — $36,750 over 3y, 0.0% of budgetCIVIC SYMPHONY ASSOCIATION OF SAN FRANCISCO — $30,000 over 2y, 24% of budgetST JOHNS RIVERKEEPER INC — $20,200 over 6y, 0.7% of budgetMANNA FOOD BANK INC — $20,000 over 2y, 0.0% of budgetTHE GARDEN CLUB OF AMERICA — $10,900 over 3y, 0.1% of budgetGarden Club of Jacksonville Inc — $6,800 over 4y, 0.7% of budgetGREENSCAPE OF JACKSONVILLE INC — $6,000 over 4y, 1.6% of budgetTHE JIM AND TABITHA FURYK FOUNDATION — $5,300 over 2y, 0.1% of budgetFOOD RUNNERS — $5,000 over 1y, 0.4% of budgetALABAMA SUSTAINABLE AGRICULTURE NETWORK — $5,000 over 1y, 2.9% of budgetSAN FRANCISCO FOOD BANK — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budget904WARD INC — $3,000 over 2y, 0.2% of budgetCIVIC ORCHESTRA OF JACKSONVILLE INC — $1,650 over 2y, 2.8% of budgetMEMORIAL PARK ASSOCIATION INC — $1,500 over 1y, 0.2% of budgetFILTER OF HOPE INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetJacksonville University — $1,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDBWPC INC — $1,000 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetTIMUCUAN PARKS FOUNDATION INC — $500 over 1y, 0.3% of budgetTHE COMMUNITY FOUNDATION FOR NORTHEAST FLORIDA INC — $500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetREAD USA INC — $250 over 1y, 0.1% of budgetBeaches Emergency Assistance Ministry I Inc — $250 over 1y, 0.0% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

The Community Foundation for Northeast Florida IncFL27.4× affinity11 shared granteesties to 11 of 11Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: The Community Foundation for Northeast Florida Inc · Jacksonville Jaguars Foundation Inc · Blue Cross Blue Shield of Florida Foundation · Pga Tour Inc · The Haskell Foundation · The Maryellen S Willis Charitable Trust · Southern Baptist Hospital of Florida Inc · Csx Foundation Inc · Td Charitable Foundation · The Ayco Charitable Foundation · The Bessemer Giving Fund · The Bank of America Charitable Foundation Inc

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Mackowski Family Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal, a single department, or state — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 70%1%3%6%10%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 2%
  • Dbwpc Inc10% of income from government
  • Jacksonville University3% of income from government
  • Greenscape of Jacksonville Inc2% of income from government
  • Read Usa Inc1% of income from government
  • Garden Club of Jacksonville Inc0% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
7get no government money at all
6report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 34 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph