Skip to content

· Private foundation

The Macfarlane Foundation

Its FY2025 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$52k
Granted FY2025still arriving
5
Grants FY2025still arriving
4
States reached
$20k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

73% of The Macfarlane Foundation’s FY2025 grant dollars went to University Of Southern California, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2025 names 1 organization directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

4
’20
4
’21
3
’22
3
’23
8
’24
1
’25

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What it funds
0190% classified

What it funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year, FY2020 to 2024.

Philanthropy$142kEducation$15kArts & Culture$8kHuman Services$5kReligion$4kEnvironment$1kHealth$1kAnimals$900Other$0
02FY2025 · 5 grants

Where the money goes

Grants by size, and the largest recipients.

By grant size · FY2025

  • Under $10k2 grants · $9k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $43k
$10,000
Median grant
4
States reached
$744k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA$19,500
Individual grant recipient$13,000
VANGUARD CHARITABLE FUND$10,000
ORCAS ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$8,000
PRINCETON UNIVERSITY$1,000
02The need
03

Does the money reach high-need areas?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, against the area’s typical level.

show:

Its human-services grants (FY24–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 10%. 0% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Its grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 10%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND: $5k → 6%GOODWIN HOUSE: $200 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount
How this is measured
Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty line in the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP.

Which US states its grants reach

WA
NY
NJ
RI
CA
CO
VA
AZ
KS
How this is measured
US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are delivered. Need from public data (U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA), shown as context about the area, never attributed to the funder’s giving.
03Its grantees
repeat funding

Who it funds again

Organizations funded in more than one year, against those funded once.

84%of every dollar goes to organizations it has funded before.
$104k · 9 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

Grantees it renews have grown median revenue +51% since the first grant, against 0% for those funded once.

9 repeat relationships: 2 still active in FY2025, 7 since wound down.

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
10

Total granted

$104k
$20k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
0%

Still filing today

33%
70%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2025, 100% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $0 went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24’25
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24’25
EducationHealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureEnvironmentOther
How this is measured
First-time means a grantee’s first year in the filing window; renewed means funded in an earlier year too. The renewed share climbs naturally as a portfolio matures, so the signal is a year that bucks it (a wave of new grantees). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as new. Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • IG
    Individual grant recipient
    6× · 2020–2025 · $88k
  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL
    2× · 2020–2021 · $6k
  • PP
    PINNACLE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH
    5× · 2020–2024 · $4k

Funded once

  • UO
    UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2024 · $6k · revenue +7%
  • HA
    HENRY ART GALLERY
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • DM
    DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC
    one grant, 2024 · $5k · revenue 0%
How this is measured

Repeat means funded in two or more distinct years. Growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Its field

Closest unfunded matches

The nonprofits that most resemble its grantees but are not funded by it, scored along the direction from the rest of the field toward the portfolio. A resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
2
President and Fellows of Harvard College

Undergraduate, graduate, and professional education and research across a broad array of academic domains.

Education
3
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
4
The George Washington University

The mission of the george washington university (gw) is to educate individuals in liberal arts, languages, sciences, learned professions, and other courses and subjects of study, and to conduct scholarly research and publish the findings…

Education
5
Golden Gate University

Golden gate university prepares individuals to lead and serve by providing high quality, practice-based educational programs in law, taxation, business and related professions - as a nonprofit institution - in an innovative and challenging…

Education
6
Pacific University

A diverse and sustainable learning community dedicated to discovery and excellence in teaching, scholarship and practice, pacific university inspires students to think, care, create and pursue justice in our world.

Education
7
Ucla Foundation

The ucla foundation is the giving, receiving, and investing arm of the ucla campus. the foundation enables private donors to help build, sustain and advance one of the world's finest academic and research institutions. private philanthropy…

Education
8
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
9
Uvmc Foundation

Enhance the patient and family experience at upper valley medical center by raising community support for programs and services which help build healthy communities.

Philanthropy
10
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

—
11
Furman University

The primary mission of furman as a liberal arts institution is to provide a distinctive education in fine arts, humanities, social sciences, mathematics and the sciences, as well as selected professional disciplines.

Education
12
University of California Irvine Foundation

The mission of the university of california, irvine foundation (uc irvine foundation) is to raise and manage private funds to support uc irvine's broader mission of excellence in teaching, research and public service. to this end, the uc…

Education
How this is measured
The grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Multicare Foundations; the most unlike its peers is University of Southern California. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.
04the grantee network

13 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2026.

Each grant beside the grantee’s revenue from every source, year by year.

How this is measured

Counted here: distinct organizations funded across 2017 to 2026, not grant rows in a single year, so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 13 of the 22 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile.

Each grantee is resolved to its own IRS returns. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
13/13
Grantees still filing
6/13
Grew since first funded

Where the money sits, by cause and then by grantee

VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM: $86,500 · PhilanthropyVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAMORCAS ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $73,000 · PhilanthropyORCAS ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient: $87,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL: $6,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOLHENRY ART GALLERY: $5,000 · OtherPINNACLE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH: $3,950 · Other+6 more: $2,150 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $19,500 · EducationUNIVERSITY…UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $6,000 · EducationUNIVERSITY…The Trustees of Princeton University: $3,600 · EducationThe Truste…DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $5,000 · Human ServicesGOODWIN HOUSE INCORPORATED: $200 · Human ServicesGORDON PARKS MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $1,500 · Arts & CultureCURTIS LEGACY FOUNDATION: $1,000 · Arts & CultureTHE SAN JUAN PRESERVATION TRUST: $1,200 · EnvironmentNAVOS: $838 · HealthMULTICARE FOUNDATIONS: $300 · Health
Philanthropy$159,500Other$104,600Education$29,100Human Services$5,200Arts & Culture$2,500Environment$1,200Health$1,138

Each grantee by its size and the funder’s share of it; top left is load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ funder's share of their budgetVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM: $86,500 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetORCAS ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION: $73,000 over 6y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA: $19,500 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION: $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC: $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University: $3,600 over 6y, 0.0% of budgetGORDON PARKS MUSEUM FOUNDATION: $1,500 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetTHE SAN JUAN PRESERVATION TRUST: $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCURTIS LEGACY FOUNDATION: $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetNAVOS: $838 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMULTICARE FOUNDATIONS: $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOODWIN HOUSE INCORPORATED: $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetZBS FOUNDATION: $150 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Grantee by grantee: a decade per organization, before and after funding

A decade per grantee: revenue shaded, grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM ↗
  • Who funds ORCAS ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF SOUTHERN CALIFORNIA ↗
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC ↗
  • Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University ↗
  • Who funds GORDON PARKS MUSEUM FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds THE SAN JUAN PRESERVATION TRUST ↗
  • Who funds CURTIS LEGACY FOUNDATION ↗
  • Who funds NAVOS ↗
  • Who funds MULTICARE FOUNDATIONS ↗
  • Who funds GOODWIN HOUSE INCORPORATED ↗
  • Who funds ZBS FOUNDATION ↗

Co-funders

Grantmakers whose grantees overlap with this funder’s far more than size alone predicts. Closer means stronger alignment; arcs show where they also fund each other. Here they form a tightly interlocked group: most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA7.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

How this is measured
Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. Overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

How much its grantees rely on government

Each dot is one organization The Macfarlane Foundation funds: left to right is the share of its income from government, bottom to top the share from The Macfarlane Foundation. Bigger dots raise more.

2024
’20’21’22’23’24’25
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%funder's share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from government →median 11%
  • The Trustees of Princeton University: 11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY20–25
How this is measured
Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that a grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first, a floor rather than a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12 to 24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read from IRS e-file XML, the funder’s own 990/990-PF, and from the multi-year returns of the 22 grantees we resolved, each linked to its source. Grantee outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III), read as association with funding, never as caused by it. Low-confidence name matches are suppressed rather than guessed. How we build these →

How this is measured
Each figure carries one of six labels. Filed is what the funder reported on its return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears.

Generated from the IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2025, released 2025. Filings run roughly 12 to 24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

Play a game based on Macfarlane’s filings →

More from the funding graph