Skip to content
Plinth

· Private foundation

The Macfarlane Foundation

Its FY2024 filing reports that it funds preselected organizations and did not take unsolicited requests; check the foundation's own site before ruling it out.

$55k
Granted FY2024still arriving
11
Grants FY2024still arriving
6
States reached
$19k
Largest

Read this first · the figures below need context

55% of The Macfarlane Foundation’s FY2024 grant dollars went to Orcas Island Community Foundation, not to grantees.

Its money now reaches organizations through that sponsor, which does not report who recommended each grant. FY2024 names 8 organizations directly, so a portfolio cannot be read from it.

Organizations named directly on the return

4
20
4
21
3
22
3
23
8
24

Amber years are those where most dollars went to a sponsor.

01What you fund
0190% classified

What you funded, over time

Every grant placed by its stated purpose and the recipient’s mission, by year — across FY20202024.

Philanthropy$142kEducation$15kArts & Culture$8kHuman Services$5kReligion$4kEnvironment$1kHealth$1kAnimals$900Other$0
02FY2024 · 11 grants

Where the money goes

Your grants by size, and where they go.

By grant size · FY2024

  • Under $10k8 grants · $14k
  • $10k–50k3 grants · $40k
$1,200
Median grant
6
States reached
$752k
Total assets
Largest grants
RecipientAmount
ORCAS ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION$19,000
VANGUARD CHARITABLE FUND$11,300
Individual grant recipient$10,000
UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION$6,000
DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND$5,000
SAN JUAN PRESERVATION TRUST$1,200
PRINCETON UNIVERSITY$1,000
PINNACLE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH$600
MULTICARE FOUNDATION$300
GOODWIN HOUSE$200
ZBS FOUNDATION$100
02The need
03

Do your dollars go where the need is?

Each grant placed by the hardship in its grantee’s ZIP, then read against the area’s typical level.

show:

Your human-services grants (FY24–24, $5k) land where the poverty rate runs at 6%, against an area that typically sits at 7%. 4% of those dollars go to grantees based in above-average-need neighborhoods. Your grants skew toward lower-need ZIPs.

area typical 7%DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND: $5k → 6%GOODWIN HOUSE: $200 → 9%0%20%40%50%more need →
grant to an above-average-need area below average· circle size = grant amount

Matched: human-services grants are those whose grantee’s IRS cause code is Human Services. Placed by people below the poverty linein the grantee’s ZIP, averaged from the tracts in that ZIP; grantee ZIP can differ from where services are delivered.

Which US states your grants reach

WA
NY
NJ
RI
CA
CO
VA
AZ
KS

US grants placed by each grantee’s ZIP, which can differ from where services are actually delivered. Need from public data — U.S. Census/ACS, CDC PLACES, Eviction Lab, USDA — shown as context about the area, never attributed to your giving.

03Your edge
repeat funding

Who you back again

Which organizations you funded more than once, and which you funded a single time. Each grantee is matched to its own filings.

82%of every dollar goes to organizations you’ve funded before.
$90k · 9 repeat orgs$20k to everyone else

And the relationships you keep tend to grow: grantees you re-up on have seen median revenue of +51% since the first grant, against -4% for the ones you funded once.

9 repeat relationships — 4 still active in FY2024, 5 since wound down; 5 grantees were first funded in FY2024 (too recent to call).

How the two cohorts compare

Re-uppedFunded once

Organizations

9
5

Total granted

$90k
$7k

Median revenue growth · since first grant

+51%
-4%

Still filing today

33%
40%

New vs renewed · share of each year

In FY2024, 48% of grant dollars renewed an existing relationship; $13k went to new ones.

50%100%’20’21’22’23’24
RenewedFirst-time

Where new relationships form · theme of each grantee’s first grant

’20’21’22’23’24
EducationHealthHuman ServicesArts & CultureEnvironmentOther

First-time = a grantee’s first year in your filing window; renewed = funded in an earlier year too. As a portfolio matures the renewed share naturally climbs — once funded, an org stays “renewable” — so the signal is the years that buck it (a new-grantee intake wave). The earliest year is left-censored: relationships that predate the data read as “new.” Theme is the grantee’s IRS cause.

Backed again, and grew

  • The Trustees of Princeton University
    5× · 2020–2024 · $3k · revenue +51%
  • GP
    GORDON PARKS MUSEUM FOUNDATION
    2× · 2021–2022 · $2k · revenue +98%
  • ZF
    ZBS FOUNDATION
    2× · 2020–2024 · $150 · revenue +2%

Funded once

  • HA
    HENRY ART GALLERY
    one grant, 2023 · $5k
  • CL
    CURTIS LEGACY FOUNDATION
    one grant, 2023 · $1k · revenue -17%
  • N
    NAVOS
    one grant, 2020 · $838 · revenue -4%

Repeat = funded in two or more distinct years; growth and survival are read from each grantee’s own subsequent IRS filings.

04Your field

The map has a center of gravity: the average direction from the rest of the sector toward the organizations the foundation funds — the shape of its giving. Scoring every nonprofit along that direction surfaces the ones that look most like the portfolio. These are the closest matchesthat aren’t grantees — a resemblance in what they say they do, not a recommendation.

1
Ucsf Foundation Investment Company

The organization provides professional investment management services for endowed gifts and financial assets entrusted to the ucsf foundation.

Education
2
Uvmc Foundation

Enhance the patient and family experience at upper valley medical center by raising community support for programs and services which help build healthy communities.

Philanthropy
3
Npr Foundation

The npr foundation ("foundation") is organized and operated exclusively for the benefit of its sole supported organization, national public radio, inc. ("npr inc."). the foundation supports npr inc. through various activities such as…

4
University of Virginia Investment Management Company

The university of virginia investment management company (uvimco) is organized to invest funds on behalf of the rector and visitors of the university of virginia (the university or uva) and university-associated organizations (uaos).

Education
5
The Uc Davis Foundation

The mission of the uc davis foundation is to secure, steward and manage private gifts for uc davis.

Education
6
Jefferson Scholars Foundation

The jefferson scholars foundation (foundation) provides academic merit-based scholarship, fellowship and professorship support to students and faculty at the university of virginia (uva).

Philanthropy
7
University of Virginia Foundation

To provide administrative services to university of virginia (university) entities, university associated organizations, or other entities involved in activities which support the university. to engage in matters pertaining to real…

Education
8
Uc Riverside Foundation

To support educational, research and public functions and programs of the riverside campus of the university of california.

Education
9
Virginia Tech Foundation Inc

Virginia tech foundation, inc. (vtf) is a virginia nonstock corporation established in 1948 for the sole purpose of managing virginia tech's endowment to advance virginia tech's mission and its strategic priorities.

Education
10
The Vermont Community Foundation

The vermont community foundation helps to build philanthropic resources to sustain healthy and vital vermont communities. the foundation connects and mobilizes people through giving to multiply the impact of philanthropy.

Philanthropy
11
United States Naval Institute

Provide an independent forum for those who dare to read, think, speak, and write to advance the professional, literary, and scientific understanding of sea power and other issues critical to global security.

12
National Public Radio Inc

National public radio, inc. ("npr") works collaboratively with member public radio station licensees ("member stations") to create a more informed public, one that is challenged and invigorated by a deeper understanding and appreciation of…

Arts & Culture

For reference, the grantee most central to the portfolio’s shape is Multicare Foundations and the most unlike its peers is Gordon Parks Museum Foundation. Resemblance is measured on each organization’s own IRS 990 mission text; it reflects how work is described, not its quality or impact.

04the grantee network

12 grantees tracked through their own filings, 2017–2025.

Each one resolved to its own IRS returns and tracked year by year — your grant beside their revenue from every source. Association, dated; never a causal claim.

Counted here: distinct organizations you funded across 20172025, not grant rows in a single year — so this will not match the grant count on the cover. 12 of the 21 grantees resolved in that span have returns of their own we could reconcile; the rest are funded organizations whose filings we could not track year by year.

0
Load-bearing (≥25% of a budget)
1
Early backer (in before they grew)
12/12
Grantees still filing
6/12
Grew since you first funded

Where your money sits — by cause, then by grantee

VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM — $76,500 · PhilanthropyVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAMORCAS ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $65,000 · PhilanthropyORCAS ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATIONIndividual grant recipient — $74,500 · OtherIndividual grant recipientUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOL — $6,000 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON SCHOOLHENRY ART GALLERY — $5,000 · OtherHENRY ART GALLERYPINNACLE PRESBYTERIAN CHURCH — $3,950 · Other+6 more — $2,150 · OtherUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION — $6,000 · EducationThe Trustees of Princeton University — $2,600 · EducationDAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC — $5,000 · Human ServicesGOODWIN HOUSE INCORPORATED — $200 · Human ServicesGORDON PARKS MUSEUM FOUNDATION — $1,500 · Arts & CultureCURTIS LEGACY FOUNDATION — $1,000 · Arts & CultureTHE SAN JUAN PRESERVATION TRUST — $1,200 · EnvironmentNAVOS — $838 · HealthMULTICARE FOUNDATIONS — $300 · Health
Philanthropy$141,500Other$91,600Education$8,600Human Services$5,200Arts & Culture$2,500Environment$1,200Health$1,138

Each org by its size and your share of it — top-left is where you’re load-bearing

25%50%75%100%$100k$1.0M$10M$100Mgrantee revenue →↑ your share of their budgetVANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM — $76,500 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetORCAS ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION — $65,000 over 5y, 0.3% of budgetUNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION — $6,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetDAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC — $5,000 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetThe Trustees of Princeton University — $2,600 over 5y, 0.0% of budgetGORDON PARKS MUSEUM FOUNDATION — $1,500 over 2y, 1.8% of budgetTHE SAN JUAN PRESERVATION TRUST — $1,200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetCURTIS LEGACY FOUNDATION — $1,000 over 1y, 0.9% of budgetNAVOS — $838 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetMULTICARE FOUNDATIONS — $300 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetGOODWIN HOUSE INCORPORATED — $200 over 1y, 0.0% of budgetZBS FOUNDATION — $150 over 2y, 0.1% of budget
Go grantee by grantee — a decade per org, and how each moved after you funded them

A decade per grantee — revenue shaded, your grants as bars, all rows on one timeline.

  • Who funds VANGUARD CHARITABLE ENDOWMENT PROGRAM
  • Who funds ORCAS ISLAND COMMUNITY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds UNIVERSITY OF WASHINGTON FOUNDATION
  • Who funds DAVIS MEMORIAL FUND INC
  • Who funds The Trustees of Princeton University
  • Who funds GORDON PARKS MUSEUM FOUNDATION
  • Who funds THE SAN JUAN PRESERVATION TRUST
  • Who funds CURTIS LEGACY FOUNDATION
  • Who funds NAVOS
  • Who funds MULTICARE FOUNDATIONS
  • Who funds GOODWIN HOUSE INCORPORATED
  • Who funds ZBS FOUNDATION

The grantmakers whose grantees overlap with yours far more than size alone predicts. Each orbits closer the stronger the alignment; the arcs between them show where they also fund each other. Here it reads as a tightly interlocked camp — most of these funders back each other's grantees too.

Vanguard Charitable Endowment ProgramPA7.5× affinity4 shared granteesties to 4 of 4Hover any node to trace its alignments.Compare side by side →

Open a dossier: Vanguard Charitable Endowment Program · Donor Advised Charitable Giving Inc · American Online Giving Foundation Inc · Fidelity Investments Charitable Gift Fund · Amazonsmile Foundation

Affinity is a Gamma-Poisson posterior co-funding rate, re-centered on the typical rate, so thin evidence shrinks toward no signal. A research starting point: overlap is association, not proof of shared intent.

Government reliance of your grantees

Every dot is one organization The Macfarlane Foundation funds. Left–right is the share of its income from government; up–down is the share from you. Bigger dots raise more. Filter to federal or a single department — and drag the year to watch it move.

2024
202122232425
no gov · 00%0%1%3%5%your share of their income ↑0%6%13%19%25%share of the org’s income from governmentmedian 11%
  • The Trustees of Princeton University11% of income from government
no gov moneyreceives it· size = income
0get no government money at all
2report government grants on their 990 we could not trace to a source (not plotted)
0rely on government for over half their income
⤢ axis zoomed · 0–25%
typical government reliance, FY2025

Government income is each org’s traced federal awards (USASpending — grants and contracts) plus state payments (open checkbooks) as a share of its total revenue (IRS Form 990); the self-reported government-grant line (990 line 1e) is carried for cross-check: a grantee that reports government grants we could not trace to a source is left off the chart rather than shown as receiving none. An association, not a claim that your grant caused the public funding. Coverage is precision-first — a floor, not a census; state records exist for 9 states, so a grantee outside them shows no state figure (dimmed) rather than a false zero. Federal award amounts are obligations, which can span years, so a single-year share is indicative. 990 filings lag 12–24 months.

On method. Every financial figure here is read directly from IRS e-file XML — your own 990/990-PF and the multi-year returns of the 21 grantees we resolved across every year we hold, several hundred filings in all (a different count from the grant rows on the cover, which are one fiscal year)— each linked to its source. Grantee achievements and outcomes are each organization’s own program-service reporting (Form 990, Part III); we read these as association with sustained funding — the foundation is one of several forces — suppress low-confidence name matches rather than guess, and say so where a figure rests on a single grant or filing. Not everything on this page is a filed figure, and the difference matters. Filed is what you reported on your return. Official is another government record about an organization, such as a federal award or a charity register, joined by name where no shared identifier exists. Resolved is an identity we worked out where the filing named a recipient without an EIN, kept only above a measured confidence threshold. Computed is arithmetic over those, like themes, portfolio clusters and co-funder strength. Context is a statistic about a place rather than about an organization, which is what the need overlay is: it describes the area a grantee’s address sits in, not where its work lands. Inferred is drawn by a model from text, like the partnerships read out of public news and organization websites. Each is labeled where it appears. How we build these →

Generated from your IRS Form 990-PF e-file return for fiscal year 2024, released 2024. Filings run roughly 12–24 months behind; figures are dated accordingly.

Source object · view filing

More from the funding graph